eager for more
I quoted only a small portion of the text , and left out the whole debate on why it is so , in order not to copy paste the whole article , if you are interested go ahead and read up on it and add any comments that you might have![]()
As Peter Sturrock explains:
"It's an effect that no one yet understands. Theorists are starting to say, 'What's going on?' But that's what the evidence points to. It's a challenge for the physicists and a challenge for the solar people too. [If it's not neutrinos,] it would have to be something we don't know about, an unknown particle that is also emitted by the sun and has this effect, and that would be even more remarkable."
Originally posted by buddhasystem
I bet it was an instrument effect.
You measure decays with electronics, after all, and electronics is susceptible to electromagnetic fields. A good solar flare can wreak micro-havoc on your circuit via Earth's magnetosphere.
There were all sorts of strange periodical dependencies of beam energies discovered at CERN when LEP was in operation (a predecessor to LHC). They found correlations with the moon (tidal distortion of crust) and local train schedule (return currents flowing in the ground cause magnetic fields). That just shows that instrumentation in nuclear physics is tricky business.
I can tell that the 33 day periodicity can have any number of explanations. For example, the secretary next door has her period on that day, and drinks more chamomile tea than usual