Please note that this thread contains no major 'conspiracy or revelation'. It's merely my own observation and ramblings regarding what I believe to
be an inaccuracy that continues to be dispensed as the 'standard definition' when used to explain earths atmospheric pressure.
If you have little or no interest in science, please feel free to move onto another thread
Like many of you, I was taught in school that at sea level, the average atmospheric pressure that we experience is approximately 14.7 psi. This
pressure we're told, is the result of the total weight of the atmosphere contained in a hypothetical 1 square inch column extending from sea level to
the top of the atmosphere.
At sea level, for example, the pressure is 14.7 pounds per square inch. This means that a slice of the atmosphere in the shape of a long, thin column,
with a one square inch base and as tall as the top of the atmosphere (at least 120 mi or 200 km), would have air within the column weighing 14.7 lb
Atmospheric pressure definition #1
and
Atmospheric pressure is defined as the force per unit area exerted against a surface by the weight of the air above that surface.
Atmospheric pressure definition #2
In the above definitions, and for the remainder of this post, we can take 'weight', 'pressure' and 'force' to be synonymous.
Here's an image to make the concept clearer:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/dc30834774b0.jpg[/atsimg]
As mentioned, the above is the standard explanation that we're taught ... that effectively a weight of approximately 14.7 lbs is pressing against
every square inch of the earth's surface, and that this pressure is caused by the
total weight of
all the air above each of those
square inch areas, extending upwards in a column from the surface to the top of the atmosphere.
However, now I'm just somewhat disappointed that I simply accepted that explanation for many years without really examining the underlying scientific
basis. If I had, it would have become quickly obvious that such an explanation really makes little scientific sense ... at least to me !
Looking at one of the above definitions again
Atmospheric pressure is defined as the force per unit area exerted against a surface by the weight of the air above that surface.
this assumes that each and every molecule of air in that square inch column is effectively transmitting a downward directed force (weight) and its the
sum total of each of those downward directed forces that generates the atmospheric pressure.
The fallacy here is that we have an implication that the force (weight) of each air molecule is ultimately felt upon the surface directly below that
column of air molecules. In other words, the force (weight) imparted by a molecule of air at a 100 kms altitude, along with the force (weight)
imparted by every intermediary air molecule, is felt along with the force (weight) of those molecules of air in direct contact with the surface.
But for this to be so, that means that
every molecule of air in that column has to be permanently and physically in contact as a single and
cohesive mass (i.e. as a bulk liquid or solid) for all of their individual forces (weight) to be felt at the surface.
To make this a little clearer, lets take a look at that column of air extending from the surface all the way to the top of the atmosphere. In this
example, a 2D rendering will be sufficient.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/cab3250147d9.jpg[/atsimg]
It's quite obvious that the greatest density of the atmosphere is to be found at the bottom of that column and that atmospheric density decreases
with altitude with the minimum density to be found at the top of the column. A decrease in density means that there is a subsequent increase in the
average distances between air molecules i.e. the molecules spread further and further apart as the density decreases.
Now lets take a close up look at a small section of that atmospheric column and magnify the air molecules.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/0efae85b5750.jpg[/atsimg]
As can be seen, the individual air molecules are
not in permanent physical contact with each other and because each air molecule has a
measurable amount of kinetic energy, they are also moving in random directions (and with random velocities) with respect to each other. In fact, the
only time that the air molecules come into relative and momentary contact is when their respective paths happen to intersect, otherwise the vast
majority of the air molecules within that column are independent of each other and
not in physical contact.
A direct corollary of the above means that there is no way that air molecules that are not in a direct and continuous chain of contact with each other
can contribute to the final force (weight) measured upon a surface.
Let me try to use an example.
If we take every air molecule in that square inch column and "glue" them together, we'll end up with a single object comprised of countless
billions of individual molecules. At this point, if we measure the 'weight' of this air-object, we'll obtain a definitive and fixed weight that
doesn't change and is the
sum of every one of those individual air molecules.
Now lets modify the above. This time we'll take all the air molecules in the top half of the column and 'glue' them together as an object, then
take all the air molecules in the lower half of the column and 'glue' them together as a second object. If we keep the 2 air-objects separated and
one above the other in the column, the weight we now measure will now be much less as we're only measuring the combined weight of the air molecules
within the lower air-object, and which are in contact with our surface. The weight of the upper air-object has no effect as it's physically separate
from the lower air-object.
Now lets take this example to the ultimate degree and physically separate
every air molecule in that column (i.e. it's normal state). Then the
only weight we will be able to measure will be that very small percentage of air molecules actually in physical contact with our surface. The weight
of any air molecule
not directly in contact with the surface (or with another molecule thats directly in contact with the surface) will
therefore not have any consequence and can be ignored.
So hopefully from the above, I've managed to successfully show why the standard definition of atmospheric air pressure is inaccurate from a
scientific standpoint.
A few common examples will help to also show this inaccuracy contained in the standard explanation.
If standard atmospheric pressure (1 atm at sea level) is dependent on the combined weight of all those billions of air molecules contained in that 1
square inch column of air extending from the surface to the top of the atmosphere, then how can there still be 1 atm of pressure when measured inside
a room ? The ceiling will act as a
physical and solid divider within the column of air and negate any possible weight effects from the majority
of the air above the ceiling. So the only measurable weight can only come from the air between the ceiling and the surface which according to the
standard definition must produce a much reduced pressure value and be way below 1 atm in value.
Another example:
We're told that the pressure on our bodies is equally distributed. In other words, if we hold our hand out parallel to the ground (palm down), that
there is 1 atm of pressure acting on the top of our hand and also 1 atm of pressure acting on the palm. But this makes no sense as there should be no
'weight' due to the small amount of air between the ground and the palm (facing the ground).
Another example:
The majority of the interior of the International Space Station (ISS) is kept at normal sea-level atmospheric pressure.
... while the rest of the station remains at the normal sea level atmospheric pressure of 14.7 psi
ISS atmospheric pressure
It's quite obvious that normal atmospheric pressure is
NOT dependent on a quantity of air many kilometers deep and can in fact be easily
produced within the very limited confines of the ISS module or even just within the few centimeters of space between an astronauts body and his space
suit.
So what's an alternative definition for air pressure ?
Quite simply, it can be explained as the direct force being exerted by
ONLY those air molecules that come in
DIRECT contact with a
surface. Any air molecule that does
NOT come into direct contact with a surface can be disregarded and have no contribution to the measured
pressure.
Using the 'standard column' example, it's not the total and combined weight of
every air molecule in the column that determines the measured
pressure value but instead
ONLY that very small percentage of air molecules at the base of the column and that come into direct contact with
the surface below the column. Therefore the greater proportion of air molecules in the column are superfluous and have no effect on the measured
pressure value.
(Note that the measured pressure is proportional to the average kinetic energy of only those few air molecules that come into actual surface contact.
The higher the average kinetic energy (i.e. temperature), the higher the pressure.)