posted on Dec, 31 2009 @ 12:57 AM
Take Phil's age and his time on various jobs he claimed to do, certainly try and consider time at college for his supposed degrees, which never
existed anyway so scratch the college time and you'll see that he would have been 17 years old when he went to work for the government. Phil stated
that he worked at Dulce in 1979.
1979 - worked at Dulce
1947 - born
32 - Phils age while working at Dulce
1981 - Last job
1947 - born
34 - Age when Phil ceased working (went on SSI)
17 - Years Phil claimed he worked in government
17 - How old he would have been when he went to work in the government.
Where are his college years in those 17 years? There aren't any however he claimed to be an Aerospace Engineer, Structural Engineer, Geological
Engineer. Schneider is a mockery to the UFO Community. Just listen to that 1995 youtube of Phil's speech and see for yourself that he doesn't have a
clue and dances around all over the place re-instilling old conspiracies of which half don't even exist and were the fabrications of others like
William Cooper, etc.
I watched phil schneider's lecture, as well as john lear's tells all interview with project camelot in Las Vegas(april 2008) and much respect to
both men. They are clearly on to something big that has been very well hidden for the last sixty years. to cut to the chase, i know that with this
big secret comes issue and inconsistencies with disclosure at every level of the, to quote John,"compartmentalized security clearances" . Also, with
an agency this secret, this invested, and this embedded, comes efforts of distraction and disinformation. both of which, i, as well as other members
of this site, have witnessed. i earlier passed the above paragraph(which somebody used as a fact to debunk John) moments ago in an effort to cross
reference both John and Phil's stories of Dulce 79 on an angelfire website which to me reeked of disinformation. and to me, the fact that both phil
and his friend's deaths are even being debated as murder, points to the likelihood that it was, especially considering the weight of their
discussions and the frequency of them. though phil likely embellished certain details, i'm not sure that John has the entire story either. but both
seem to be shade of truth. and a rather alarming truth at that.