It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
I have to care what christians think because too often they do stupid things such as try to get creationism taught in schools (like they did in a local county here a few years back).
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
I don't care to convince you that Jesus didn't exist. But I will continue to point out that there is nothing in the way of evidence to establish that he did exist.
Originally posted by texastig
How about atheist teaching the belief that there was nothing and nothing happened to nothing and nothing magically exploded for no reason, creating everything and then a bunch of everything magically rearranged itself for no reason whatsoever into self-replicating bits which then turned into dinosaurs.
Then your going against your own atheist scholars.
Originally posted by mr10k
reply to post by traditionaldrummer
You DO understand that these same people only used Christ's image as a means to capture more lands right?
In all living things, these amino acids are organized into proteins, and the construction of these proteins is mediated by nucleic acids. Which of these organic molecules first arose and how they formed the first life is the focus of abiogenesis.
Originally posted by mr10k
Made Reference: John, Paul, Peter, Solomon, God,
almost every Jew believed the saviour was to be born, and almost all of thenm believ it was Jesus Christ.
Wrote in Detail: 700 books in the bible, including ove 15000 manuscripts.
Documents of the time:
Originally posted by mr10k
reply to post by traditionaldrummer
Atheists DO beileve in such things. They believe that magically, there was a Giant *BANG*, and then some small building blocks formed, which became atoms, then hydrogen, then helium, on and on. Until, Once upon a time, one special atom, hit another special atom and created a living, breathing organism. Explain the faults in your Atheist theory. How the hell would we get a living organism from random particles clashing around together. Of course there had to be another living organism somewhere in the universe that made them, and them, and them, and thus , even in the Atheist theory, there has to be some original living thing, in order for another to be created, otherwise, we wouldn't have evolution. instead, we would die, then a piece of us would break of and grow and so on, because we would be coming from something that wasn't alive.
Originally posted by mr10k
Either the Bible is a book that explains what happened, or we all just come from dust.
he earliest phases of the Big Bang are subject to much speculation. In the most common models, the Universe was filled homogeneously and isotropically with an incredibly high energy density, huge temperatures and pressures, and was very rapidly expanding and cooling. Approximately 10−37 seconds into the expansion, a phase transition caused a cosmic inflation, during which the Universe grew exponentially.[31] After inflation stopped, the Universe consisted of a quark–gluon plasma, as well as all other elementary particles.
Originally posted by mr10k
Dude, just stop arguing you make no sense.
1: Jesus is the Word of God, and of course God said himself that he will send his Word to Earth to guide us.
2: I'm referring to the Jews that became christians. Many, no, most, Jews DID in fact believe that Jesus christ, after his death, was the messiah, and that number just kept growing.
The flood story is not fake. It happened exactly at that time period. Other cultures were there when it happened. Genesis clearly acknowledged that the Flood happened. Wait, No. Of course the Flood must fake. oTherwise, why would almost all ancient cultures of the World write about it
?
Flood "myth"
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Atheists don't teach any such thing. Also, it appears you have serious misunderstandings of the Big Bang theory and Evolutionary theory. We teach science in schools and that which is taught is based on testable, repeatable evidence.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
I don't care if some atheist scholars insist Jesus actually existed. They cannot make such a claim since there is no evidence supporting it.
Originally posted by mr10k
Just because I'm a Christian I can't know what the Big Bang is? Obviously you think you're much smarter than me. YOUR NOT!
Originally posted by texastig
The schools have accepted, and taught evolution and the origin of the species for decades.
Skeptical Scholar Gerd Lüdemann said this:
"It may be taken as historically certain that Peter and the disciples had experiences after Jesus’ death in which Jesus appeared to them as the risen Christ."