It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by psikeyhackr
Also, you fail at Grammar. "Simple complete nonsense" is the correct way to state your sentence. Or perhaps "Simply complete nonsense". Thanks, good sir.
Simply completely nonsensical.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by psikeyhackr
And I can read. It's not right. Too many ly parts.]
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
I think there might have been a noticeable delay. I also think that they would risk some of them detonating in the seconds after as the initial damage settled, and possibly at some distance from the impact point.
Google Video Link |
Witnesses talk about the quiet before hand. And a look at the videos shows that there are no CD-type explosions in the immediate seconds before the fall.
By all means post it. It seems to accelerate towards the end when nothing was left to hold it up, but the building seems pretty steady in the beginning.
but I don't think a high level of accuracy is plausible.
It's not quite the same as the Pentagon hit either, since that's wider . The WTC pilots were dealing with three dimensions, as it were.
Witnesses talk about the quiet before hand. And a look at the videos shows that there are no CD-type explosions in the immediate seconds before the fall.
Even Steve Jones says that the Thermite wouldn't work on its own, so where are those "traditional" explosives? There's no sign of them at all, in footage or physical evidence.
Originally posted by Azp420
- Compressed air to somehow progressively move down the towers and blow out windows and eject material at a faster rate than the pancaking floors are falling (and therefore unable to be responsible for compressing that air).
That's a bit of a lazy argument. You're suggesting that it's possible, if you have enough cash, to access (completely secure) networks of utterly ruthless murderers. And then after they've done what you want you can easily threaten them with their lives? It sounds like a film to me. Far too many potential weaknesses.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by psikeyhackr
I did not. You want to make a WTC argument about grammar be my guest.
And you did not answer my question. What redundancies did the WTC structure have.
Also, you fail at Grammar. "Simple complete nonsense" is the correct way to state your sentence. Or perhaps "Simply complete nonsense". Thanks, good sir.
Simply completely nonsensical.
The video failed to compensate for the lack of resistance. There was no upward force, because that requires the whole structure to fall together. He failed to add in the whole lack of upward force due to the falling inner structure. Only the outer structure could resist, and it was not made for that. And as seen, the outer structure did not fall completely. IE, the total force downward of the upper part only hit the inner structure. Not the total structure.
Like I stated. What redundancies did the WTC have?
Two poles and a block on top of them.
Heat generated termite which melted the inner structure. No structure, no stand up.
Originally posted by oniongrass
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Originally posted by Azp420
I think the idea was to make it look like planes and fires caused the collapses...
Either that, or planes and fires caused the collapse.
And I'd love to see a Truther theory on how the collapses could, with absolute precision, be made to start at the impact points. I imagine it'll involve super advanced technology, hundreds of 'insiders' and a tortuously contorted piece of logic that could benefit from a major slice of Occam's razor.
OK they had a half hour or so after the impacts to do their final programming. The charges had been placed long before, software written and tested, but there was time to make final adjustments to the software running the detonation program, perhaps as little as setting the parameter for the floor level where the plane went in.
Occam's firmly on my side.
Originally posted by Azp420
Sure, the Pentagon pilots had a wider target, but in my book 20 ft above the ground at 500mph for about a mile is a pretty high level of accuracy. If you can do that the extra challenge of lining up a narrower target shouldn't present too many difficulties.
As Devino pointed out, there were reports of explosions before the collapse of all three buildings. If it was me, I'd save most of the loud ones for after collapse has initiated.
You say there is no sign of explosives, but I would like to draw your attention to what I said about one of the conditions for your theory to be true.
Originally posted by Azp420
- Compressed air to somehow progressively move down the towers and blow out windows and eject material at a faster rate than the pancaking floors are falling (and therefore unable to be responsible for compressing that air).
It is obviously not compressed air which is causing the puffs of dust and ejected material at the leading edge of the wave of destruction is it? How can you explain this without explosives?
An organization such as the CIA doesn't need to threaten peoples lives. You automatically know, that if they're paying you a lot of money to do a job and keep your mouth shut, you better not start causing trouble for them.
There are loud noises minutes before the collapses initiate.
Look at CDs on the net. There are always a series of loud reports...