It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Blue Shift
Originally posted by ALOSTSOUL
The universe is so large there has to be more life out there than that confined to this rock.
Why is size all that important? You want me to go though the logic again? Okay...
You have a box. There's a red ball in it.
You have NO IDEA how it got there.
You double the size of the box. Look inside.
How many red balls will be there? One.
You triple the size of the box. How many balls in there now? One. Okay.
A hundred times as big.
A million times as big.
Now you tell me how big that box has to be before there is going to be another ball in it. Are you assuming that some how, at some point, another red ball will magically appear in it? Why? How?
Originally posted by Blue Shift
Originally posted by MarkusMaximus
Your logic is flawed. The "other" red ball could be so far away that you're not capable (yet) of seeing it. Yet to preemptively deny the possibility of its existence would be folly.
But neither can you simply assume that another ball exists in the box if it gets to a certain size, if size is the only variable factor. That's logic, right there. Should I assume that any box of sufficient size will have two or more balls in it?
Originally posted by MarkusMaximus
We can, however, point at indirect evidence. By using satellite telescopes, we can observe planets in areas where life could be reasonably expected to exist...And by watching these planets, we can observe fluctuations in their atmospheric makeup. In other words, we'd see fluctuations in the gases that comprise their atmospheres. And that's interesting, because on earth that happens due to seasons and plant cycles.......
Originally posted by robbinsj
The box is man made and only a man made object was placed in it thus this logic does not measure up correctly.
Originally posted by Maddogkull
Are you a materialist that believes everything was random, including life? Hopefully you don’t take this as an offensive approach, just wondering your position.
Originally posted by ALOSTSOUL
Even if creation is random, the size of the universe and length of time it has existed and will exists for, tells us life is a fundamental part of reality.
as it is proven that even with infinite time and space, there are unique things in the universe. Not everything repeats. Not everything duplicates.
Originally posted by zeetroyman
i completely agree..
First response to any sceptic is " there are more grains of sand on earth than planets in our Galaxy, now tell me that not one of those planets doesnt have life".
To think such a thing is ludicrious!
There are other lifeforms out there, we dont understand space, how it works, how to travel vast distances in a short space of time etc..
Originally posted by Matrix Rising
But where is there a shred of evidence that this is the case.
Originally posted by ALOSTSOUL
On an infinite timeline everything and anything WILL duplicate and repeat. A good thought experiment for this is the The infinite monkey theorem. The monkey would not just do it once but an infinite amount of times.