A New, Speculative Theory on Nibiru (Extra-Dimensional!), page 1

privacy

Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times

Topic started on 24-8-2010 @ 09:01 AM by Solasis

To start this off, I'd like to say that I do not actually believe this; neither, though, do I disbelieve it. When I talk about it from the following perspective, I make it my "Acceptance" to steal a term from Charles Fort.

this is an idea that's been bumping around in my head for a few weeks now. It's pretty well established that Nibiru (and Nemesis and whatever else we talk about here) are not approaching us physically or visibly; the videos of "second suns" and "New Evidence of Nibiru" have been pretty properly debunked. (If you're not fully convinced that they have been debunked, I'm sorry to have offended you; accept for a brief moment while you consider this theory that they have been.) But what if it's not coming through normal space?

Most physicists currently believe, with some pretty convincing evidence which I do not understand in the least so I will not attempt to explain it, that our universe consists of 11 dimensions, whereas we're only directly acquainted with 4 (up-down, left-right, forwards-backwards, and time). Suppose for a moment that at least some of these extra 7 dimensions are spatial, that they extend in directions which we can't perceive much the same way we extend up-and-down and left-and-right and front-and-back. There would be a near infinitude of imperceptible distance in these directions, or at least as much as there is to our left and to our right. And anything moving through these dimensions would have the potential to intersect with our familiar dimensions.

Some of you have probably already noted a strain of HP Lovecraft in this description, and you'd be right. I did come upon this idea initially from thinking about Cthulhu MYthos stories I could write. The idea came to me that perhaps the ancient evidence which many people claim to be proof of Nibiru and Nemesis could be reinterpreted; maybe the physical evidence, when viewed from an angle we can't even see, would make more sense; maybe the cultural evidence, which I'm not really familiar with but I know has been claimed, is rooted in how those ancient civilizations could understand what they were seeing. This would, oddly, both debunk writers such as Sitchin and show that they were closer to the truth than those of us who already disbelieve ever thought.

So, in summation: Could Nibiru be an extra-dimensional body which does actually pass us by every 3600 (or whatever) years? Could it b that we just won't see it coming, because we are completely incapable of looking in that direction? And it it is... Might it be more than a planet? Perhaps a vast, Cyclopean entity... Hehe!

reply posted on 24-8-2010 @ 09:16 AM by Le Colonel

Interesting concept, I dont believe it, but interesting idea.

Im on the Fence about Nibiru (or whatever other name it has been called) I do not think that it will be coming anytime soon, if at all, but we would certainly know if it came into our solar system, If it was as large as some state.

I would rather think that Nibiru could actually be a much smaller moonlet or something, that might pass by every few thousand years or so. But a planet the size of Jupiter passing by Earth, there is no evidence that this has happened, ever. There is some pretty big gravitational forces at work in planet flybys, id imagine.

This theory makes more sense than it coming in from the southern elipitcal plane.

reply posted on 24-8-2010 @ 09:55 AM by CHA0S

reply to post by Solasis

So, in summation: Could Nibiru be an extra-dimensional body which does actually pass us by every 3600 (or whatever) years? Could it b that we just won't see it coming

That isn't a new theory at all...being a member from 04, you should really know that.

2nd

[edit on 24/8/10 by CHA0S]

reply posted on 24-8-2010 @ 10:11 AM by ET_MAN

reply to post by Solasis

Could Nibiru be an extra-dimensional body?

Yes

Best Wishes!

reply posted on 24-8-2010 @ 10:57 AM by Three_moons

I've thought of ideas similar to this a few times. I usually think of it as a filter of some sort that we haven't yet acquired because my mind can grasp that better than other dimensions, but the result is the same. Just because we can't observe it, or anything else for that matter, with our known and perceivable senses and knowledge doesn't prove that it doesn't exist, does it? I lean towards anything is possible but hold caution close to me and don't tend to jump to conclusions.

reply posted on 24-8-2010 @ 11:06 AM by starsyren

reply to post by Solasis

GREAT CONCEPT!

I've always thought of life itself like the Light-Spectrum...that there are parts of it we can not percieve because of the physical limitations of our eyes, ears, skin & other senses. I once thought, too, that what if (in another dimension somewhere) that Earth was the only planet in our system that didn't hold life. Since it's the only one that DOES in this one.

Not beyond impossible, I say!!!

reply posted on 24-8-2010 @ 11:08 AM by Nathan-D

Here's a very interesting video that I watched a few months ago about this subject: www.youtube.com...

reply posted on 24-8-2010 @ 11:12 AM by ChemBreather

I suggest it's name is : Vulcan (lol)

Have a read on here:

THE NEW TRANS-PLUTONIAN PLANET

The new Transplutonian: Here is what Abbe Charles Nicelaud, known to astrologers as Fomalhaut, wrote in 1897: “The planets beyond Neptune exist, they are named Pluto; and Vulcan’s reality is also admitted.” These astounding words were verified as to Pluto 33 years later when Pluto was discovered and indeed given that name. This prediction has a good chance of coming true also through the American astronomers’ calculations about the new Trans-plutonian (located beyond Pluto). Its estimated size, equal to Jupiter or at least to Saturn, should make it easier to see than Pluto, as soon as it leaves the celestial sector containing several very bright stars. We hope to photograph it in 1980. Astronomical tables have even been worked out for this new planet and its astrological influence seems to be of prime importance for human affairs.

[Note: As of mid-2000 there has been quiet mainstream acknowledgement that this planet must exist, due to various orbital anomalies and other factors. It has not yet been named or officially photographed. From a cyclology perspective, it is interesting that there was indeed widespread interest in this planet surrounding 1980, which coincides with a Jupiter-Saturn conjunction, and then in 2000 when the conjunction came again, the interest suddenly renewed and cross-references were made to the original work from 1980. The work of The Enterprise Mission shows that a transplutonian planet must be in place in order to balance the Sun in a visibly system-wide relationship between the total angular momentum of a celestial object and its internal energetic emissions, known as Schuster’s Hypothesis.

And this was in 1983:

Possibly as Large as Jupiter: Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered
The mystery body was seen twice by the infrared satellite as it scanned the northern sky from
last January to November, when the satellite ran out of the supercold helium that allowed its
telescope to see the coldest bodies in the heavens. The second observation took place six
months after the first and suggested the mystery body had not moved from its spot in the sky
near the western edge of the constellation Orion in that time.

reply posted on 24-8-2010 @ 11:21 AM by Unity_99

Relating to 11 11. Aug 11- Oct. 31 2011, perhaps even Nov 11, 2011, to me seem crucial dates and also, the Mayan calendar was more than just time, and cosmic events, earth changes, but also, the return of Quetzcoatl. Their star beings, feathered serpent also linked to the same Siris b and Orion as Egypt. All things are coded to Saturn, and one of the moons there looks like the death star from star wars. To me, this is linked to this return, of the annanuki, that which demanded human sacrifices, and who our bloodlines serve.

reply posted on 24-8-2010 @ 11:25 AM by ChemBreather

Robert Morning sky from 1996, he has some intresting conclusions at 10min mark..
Have a listen..

YouTube Link

reply posted on 24-8-2010 @ 11:53 AM by Solasis

Originally posted by CHA0S
reply to post by Solasis

So, in summation: Could Nibiru be an extra-dimensional body which does actually pass us by every 3600 (or whatever) years? Could it b that we just won't see it coming

That isn't a new theory at all...being a member from 04, you should really know that.

2nd

[edit on 24/8/10 by CHA0S]

Well, I took about a 4 year hiatus, so I missed a lot, but I've never heard it before -- where is it said? do you have any links? Besides the videos already posted, I mean; I suspect they might be saying the same thing.

(Thanks for all the suppport and videos; I'm gonna check them out when I get home. I'm on an early lunchbreak at work now.)

reply posted on 24-8-2010 @ 12:17 PM by g146541

reply to post by Solasis

I dunno!
Most important though is I don’t care, as I still stand by my idea that if Harry Stamper is not going up there to save us then we better get to enjoying life while we can.
The biggest thing I hold onto is there is surely a lot more that we do not know than what we do know.
Science before it was accepted as fact was a theory and theories get smashed every day.
Enjoy!

reply posted on 25-8-2010 @ 11:28 AM by stereologist

reply to post by ChemBreather

The claims of the astrology website may not be correct, especially about the claims of Fomalhaut. The only place reporting that seems to be that website with the item mirrored in a few other astrology sites.

Notice that there is a claim to a planet Vulcan. That was a proposed planet closer to the sun than Mercury. That was shown to be nonexistent decades ago. Notice that the dates for the new planet are pre-1989. At that time a flyby of Neptune showed that the planet had less mass than believed. The correction made the perturbations issue disappear.

As far as the 1983 Washington Post article, chembreather notice that the object had not moved in 6 months. The reason for that of course was that the object was a distant galaxy. The article mentioned this about the object:

So mysterious is the object that astronomers do not know if it is a planet, a giant comet, a nearby "protostar" that never got hot enough to become a star, a distant galaxy so young that it is still in the process of forming its first stars or a galaxy so shrouded in dust that none of the light cast by its stars ever gets through.

So body means any of the above and it turned out to be a distant galaxy.

Pages: ^^TOP^^