It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kyred
reply to post by PersonalChoice
I'm not sure if I'm a truther/debunker. I'm just a skeptic.
I suppose I have no reason to post?
Originally posted by PersonalChoice
Likewise, do Debunker's believe that the location of this mosque makes no difference? Or do they believe the mosque should be moved further away?
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Speaking of oppositon to the erection (I mean, building) of something that might "offend" some people's sensiblities.....
Lakehurst, NJ -- Balloon store only three miles from site of Hindenburg disaster.
'Nuf said....
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by PersonalChoice
Speaking of oppositon to the erection (I mean, building) of something that might "offend" some people's sensiblities.....
....and that "sacred ground" must remain....well, "sacred"...here are some more (tongue-in-cheek) recent examples of faux 'outrage' and angst:
New York -- New Citibank ATM vestibule just two blocks from site of devastating financial collapse.
Elizabeth, NJ -- Bed, Bath and Beyond on sacred IKEA grounds.
Pearl Harbor, HI -- P.F. Chang's location a reasonable taxi ride away from the U.S.S. Arizona Memorial.
Philadelphia, PA -- British consulate on hard-won U.S. soil.
Culver City, CA -- Comedy club built reight next to the site where terrible movie Grown Ups was filmed.
Lakehurst, NJ -- Balloon store only three miles from site of Hindenburg disaster.
Olathe, KS -- Barnes & Noble.
'Nuf said....
Originally posted by Yog-Sothoth
I never understood why they didn't just rebuild the World Trade Center. Would that not be the ultimate way to show that America can overcome anything, even devastating destruction?