It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by oozyism
I'm talking about Universal + Biological evolution, I believe non is random, it is absurd to claim it is random because it has been proven that nothing in this universe is random.
The Oxford English Dictionary defines "random" thus:
Having no definite aim or purpose; not sent or guided in a particular direction; made, done, occurring, etc., without method or conscious choice; haphazard.
Wikipedia
Originally posted by eNumbra
reply to post by oozyism
It was created by a person.
That hardly even suggests that god created the universe, or that he's had a hand in the biological and technological growth of humanity.
You have a belief, not proof: deal with it and move on from this mindset.
I'm talking about Universal + Biological evolution, I believe non is random, it is absurd to claim it is random because it has been proven that nothing in this universe is random.
The theory of evolution includes many reasons for some species flourishing and others not; nowhere is it ever suggested that anything about it is random. That doesn't mean there is a guiding hand. Just that the fastest rabbits outran their predators and passed on their genes to the next generation leading to more faster rabbits.
The modern evolutionary synthesis ascribes the observed diversity of life to natural selection, in which some random genetic mutations are retained in the gene pool due to the non-random improved chance for survival and reproduction that those mutated genes confer on individuals who possess them.
The characteristics of an organism arise to some extent deterministically (e.g., under the influence of genes and the environment) and to some extent randomly. For example, the density of freckles that appear on a person's skin is controlled by genes and exposure to light; whereas the exact location of individual freckles seems to be random.
Originally posted by oozyism
I think you confused that part, we weren't talking about natural selecting, and the survival of the fittest. We were talking about mutation:
The point is, it didn't. The point is, if you examine computers without the knowledge of a creator, you can also conclude that they came to existence without any creator, that they steadily evolved and the other computers became extinct due to natural selection, and the survival of the fittest.
GOD takes the idea of evolution as an insult to him.
Originally posted by rogerstigers
reply to post by oozyism
Whoops, you just jumped tracks on us.
Would you say that there is a differance between the assembly of ingrediants into a composite object and evolution?
When I cook dinner in the kitchen, is that me doing the assembly or God, in you analogy?
From my point of view (I am a pantheist), we are all a part of a sentient universe, thus anything we do is technicall the actions of "god", but I don't think of it in terms of lacking free will or pre-destination. More like a little kid trying to figure out why it has five toes or why it gets dizzy whe it spins around.
So I find your jump from evolution to items designed and assembled by man to be a little unexpected.
Originally posted by oozyism
reply to post by airspoon
You are arguing that evolution is null and god must have created life (or at least humans) because there is no other explanation. Am I right?
No ..
I'm arguing that evolution does exist, but it is not random as evidence suggests.
REALLY???? It sounds like you agree with DARWIN! You see, Darwin's insight was that there was a distinctly non-random process that drove the evolution of living things; that process is called natural selection.
REALLY???? It sounds like you agree with DARWIN! You see, Darwin's insight was that there was a distinctly non-random process that drove the evolution of living things; that process is called natural selection.
Originally posted by oozyism
reply to post by Tearman
REALLY???? It sounds like you agree with DARWIN! You see, Darwin's insight was that there was a distinctly non-random process that drove the evolution of living things; that process is called natural selection.
Nit...
Why do people always say natural selection when we are talking about random?
Mutation..
Originally posted by oozyism
reply to post by Tearman
REALLY???? It sounds like you agree with DARWIN! You see, Darwin's insight was that there was a distinctly non-random process that drove the evolution of living things; that process is called natural selection.
Nit...
Why do people always say natural selection when we are talking about random?
Mutation..