It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by agentofchaos
People keep talking about the law. However, nothing said he couldn't pick the fruit.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
Then you really dont understand asktheanimals point. Humans already have taken the best of all habitats almost everywhere. Thats one of the reasons we set aside land for parks and wildlife, so that the animals can have some scraps of land to live on and make a living from. And here you are arguing that you should be able to take as much of their resources as you want.
Originally posted by rubbertramp
it also seems some would definately rather humans not eat any of the fruit.
I dont see many people saying that at all. What I see people saying is they would rather humans not pack their bags full of fruit and take it out of the park if that is not allowed.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
*snip*
What gets me going is the assumption that we humans should be entitled to take everything we want, from anywhere we want, no matter what harm it causes every other living thing on the planet. That attitude has collectively gotten us into a really bad spot. We dont see the full effects of it yet, but we will soon.
*snip*
Originally posted by babybunnies
Why didn't you just let them look in your bag? What else did you have to hide? If it was me, I'd have just let them have a look, maybe offer THEM an apple, and be on my way.
Originally posted by rubbertramp since i was eating an apple they actually asked me what was in my pack, 'fruit, officer, and a jug of water'. i thought he was kidding when he asked to see. 'sure, go ahead', i know this was a mistake.
Originally posted by babybunnies
Actually, the law DOES say that you can't remove flora and fauna from the parks. Nothing about picking the fruit, so long as he ate it IN the park. This is to protect national parks from people who would take economic advantage.
Originally posted by agentofchaos
People keep talking about the law. However, nothing said he couldn't pick the fruit.
With the exception of lands administered by the National Park Service, invertebrate fossils, rocks, plants, fruits and berries may be collected for personal use on most public lands. For specific rules, consult the appropriate agency.
And, as everyone knows, ignorance of the law is NO defence.
Originally posted by Alethea
I think this is a maxim we should all be challenging. click to see the rest
Originally posted by Three_moons
Ignorance of the law doesn't pass for an excuse I've heard but how are people supposed to know everything?
Originally posted by rubbertramp
there's an old homestead nearby, lots of fruit trees. apples, pears, cherries, a good assortment. it is now national forest property. i hike back up there and walk the dog. there's old spanish aquaducts that feed all the trees.
Originally posted by rubbertramp
then they explained to me that resources in the area are not allowed to be removed.
he got pissed when i laughed, and put me in cuffs.
I dont see many people saying that at all. What I see people saying is they would rather humans not pack their bags full of fruit and take it out of the park if that is not allowed.