It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Cancer is DEAD: Cancer cures from A to Z

page: 14
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in


posted on Aug, 23 2010 @ 07:04 PM
Holy Cow Dude!! What a freiking awesome post.

S&F for you my friend. I wonder now if you can PM me with this info? I am struggling myself as well as my mom, and I don't want to see this info lost. It's a lot for me to digest. I don't want to come back to ATS and not be able to find it.

Again thank a ton.

posted on Aug, 23 2010 @ 07:10 PM
reply to post by IgnoranceIsntBlisss


I would like to confirm that I am not a "cancer doctor".....I apologise if I have expressed myself poorly & given you that impression.

I have degree level medical & business qualifications & subsequent to my clinical work as completed some years ago, I now run a large specialist medical business that specialises in the introduction & ongoing implementation of new, leading edge medical technologies.

I will write you a detailed reply at the end of today, when I complete my work commitments.

May I commend you again on the excellent information you have provided in your thread.

Kind regards
Maybe…maybe not

posted on Aug, 23 2010 @ 07:20 PM
reply to post by IgnoranceIsntBlisss

I would recommend the following books by Jeff Primack:

"Conquering ANY Disease" and "Smoothie Formulas"

Both can be purchased on his website:

The key to reversing any disease, including cancer, is not just eating the right foods, but also eating the right PART of those foods in a MICRONIZED state. This can be accomplished by purchasing a 3HP blender and even though the 2HP blenders are half the price, they are not as effective at micronizing the food to release the phytochemicals needed to heal your body.

I attended his 4-day Qigong seminar in mid-July. He told us about a patient who had a malignant tumor the size of a melon (watermelon?) on his pancrease. His doctor gave him 1 month to die and stated he would not benefit from any medications or surgery. The patient went to a Naturopathic Doctor who stated 30 days was not enough time for him to do anything to help this man, as he would need a minimum of 90 days. The patient pressed this doctor to give him SOMETHING to at least try. So the N.D. has him eating 6 lbs of beets every day. 30 days later, the patient saw his M.D. who was astounded and at a loss for HOW his tumor could have reduced to a size that was nearly gone in such a short time. The patient told his M.D. what he did.

If nothing else, at least it is worth a shot to try. You have nothing to lose and your whole life to gain.

posted on Aug, 23 2010 @ 08:24 PM
reply to post by Nivcharah

Beets! Thanks I missed those!

Betalain looks like it's really good for you, and useful, but I couldn't find any abstract titles following my criteria I used in this piece.

So right now I'm looking at the different ways cancer cells are killed, to hopefully construct a listing of which compounds affect which mechanisms. I'm thinking full spectrum assault here, so covering all of the bases seems the best way to invest in it.

In this targeting process I'm spotting new entries...

Xanthium Strumarium Plant.
There's more than one compound in it that appears effective. The following is a "Microtubule Interfering Substance", one of the several different ways to kill a cancer:

Pharmacologically Active Natural Compounds for Lung Cancer

Regarding lung cancer, a methanolic extract of the leaves of Xanthium strumarium L. (Asteraceae) exhibited a strong inhibition of the proliferation of cultured human tumor cells, including A549 NSCLC cell line. The active constituents have been identified as 8-epi-xanthatin (Figure 1) and its epoxide, two xanthanolide sesquiterpene lactones. Their IC50 values have been calculated as 4.5 and 3.0 microM respectively, where the positive control cisplatin was 4.7 microM. (IC50 is the concentration of a compound
needed to reduce growth of a population of cells by 50 percent in vitro. At higher concentrations (64 and 58 mM, respectively) the two xantholides
showed a promising farnesyltransferase (FTase) inhibitory effect. 21 Farnesylation of certain oncoproteins (especially Ras proteins) is required for their oncogenic activity, and thus FTase inhibition could specifically stop Ras-mediated cellular proliferation. Synthetic FTase inhibitors have demonstrated activity against various human cancer cell lines, including NSCLC.22 An earlier study showed X. strumarium extracts are able to effec-
tively inhibit tubuline polymerization in mammalian tissues,23 which could be a plausible explanation of these findings.

Sources: Barley & Xanthium Strumarium seeds, Chaga Mushroom.

Apoptotic cell death through inhibition of protein kinase CKII activity by 3,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde purified from Xanthium strumarium

The CKII inhibitory compound was purified from the fruit of Xanthium strumarium by organic solvent extraction and silica gel chromatography. The inhibitory compound was identified as 3,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde by analysis with FT-IR, FAB-Mass, EI-Mass, (1)H-NMR and (13)C-NMR. 3,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde inhibited the phosphotransferase activity of CKII with IC(50) of about 783 microM. Steady-state studies revealed that the inhibitor acts as a competitive inhibitor with respect to the substrate ATP. A value of 138.6 microM was obtained for the apparent K(i). Concentration of 300 microM 3,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde caused 50% growth inhibition of human cancer cell U937. 3,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde-induced cell death was characterised with the cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and procaspase-3. Furthermore, the inhibitor induced the fragmentation of DNA into multiples of 180 bp, indicating that it triggered apoptosis. This induction of apoptosis by 3,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde was also confirmed by using flow cytometry analysis. Since CKII is involved in cell proliferation and oncogenesis, these results suggest that 3,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde may function by inhibiting oncogenic disease, at least in part, through the inhibition of CKII activity.

3,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde purified from the barley seeds (Hordeum vulgare) inhibits oxidative DNA damage and apoptosis via its antioxidant activity

In antioxidant activity assay such as DPPH radical and hydroxyl radical scavenging assay, Fe(2+) chelating assay, and intracellular ROS scavenging assay by DCF-DA, 3,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde was found to scavenge DPPH radical, hydroxyl radical and intracellular ROS. Also it chelated Fe(2+). In in vitro oxidative DNA damage assay and the expression level of phospho-H2A.X, it inhibited oxidative DNA damage and its treatment decreased the expression level of phospho-H2A.X. And in oxidative cell death and apoptosis assay via MTT assay and Hoechst 33342 staining, respectively, the treatment of 3,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde attenuated H(2)O(2)-induced cell death and apoptosis. These results suggest that the barley may exert the inhibitory effect on H(2)O(2)-induced tumor development by blocking H(2)O(2)-induced oxidative DNA damage, cell death and apoptosis.

Cancer Cell Cytotoxicity of Extracts and Small Phenolic Compounds from Chaga

The phenolic components isolated from the 80% MeOH extracts had markedly greater cancer cell toxicity than the extracts themselves. In particular, two out of seven compounds showed strong cytotoxicity towards several tumor cell lines without giving rise to significant cell toxicity toward normal cells. For example, the 50% lethal dose for 3,4-dihydroxybenzalacetone was 12.2μmol/L in PA-1 cells but was 272.8μmol/L in IMR90 cells. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis further revealed these phenolic ingredients have high potentiality for apoptosis induction in PA-1 cells.

[edit on 23-8-2010 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss]

posted on Aug, 23 2010 @ 08:26 PM
reply to post by kinkykoala

Just bookmark my site if you're that concerned. As long as I'm around my work will never die. I want to do some things before I go and do any conversions.

posted on Aug, 23 2010 @ 09:39 PM

Originally posted by mnmcandiez
reply to post by rogerstigers

Diabetes is NOT cancer. You can make diabetes go away just by losing weight and eating healthy. My sister did this after she got a lap band. To compare diabetes and cancer is ridiculous.

1) There is a HUGE differance between Type I and Type II diabetes. They are completely differant disorders. In Type II diabetes (fat people disease as it has commonly been viewed), the body has grown intolerant of its own insulin and this results in high blood sugars and a long term cascade failure of the pancreas. In Type I (the type that my wife has, also know as Juvinile Onset Diabetes), something happens to the pancreas that prevents it from manufacturing insulin at all. My wife came down with a life-threatening case of chicken pox when she was 9. As she got better, she began showing the symptoms of high blood sugars. She was hospitalized with her blood sugars in the 900s. She has been taking daily insulin shots ever since. Recent research indicates that this form of onset is the result of an autoimmune reaction that leads the body to view the Islet cells as foreign invaders, wiping them out and thus the body's ability to generate insulin.

2) Yes, you are right, there is no comparison between Cancer and Diabetes. They are two seperate conditions that behave quite differantly. In fact, I never compared them.

[edit on 8-23-2010 by rogerstigers]

posted on Aug, 23 2010 @ 09:41 PM
What in the world?

You really created something that most people will never read, and AS YOU SAID YOURSELF, there isn't a "cure" for cancer.

Acai berries? They aren't even a "superfood" much less a cancer cure.

A lot of these things you posted are lab results in vitro or controlled experiments that DO NOT translate to cures.

You swing people in with the "evil industries" (which few people would disagree with, especially here) then make it seem like the answer was "here all along for nearly pennies a day with nature's cures!"

Reminds me of the last time I heard there was a cure for cancer and AIDS if you ordered one of those electric zappers or Miracle Mineral Solution (scam).

Seriously, and I bet few people here will challenge this information or your claims. And, if they do, they will not have read all the information, so their opposition will be refuted.

This is a tactic I'm familiar with that involves presenting so much information that people really can't practically investigate the claims, and even if they wanted to, it would take weeks.

I hope nobody here really goes on to cure anyone with some cinnamon and vanilla tea sweetened with honey while smoking a joint!


posted on Aug, 23 2010 @ 10:00 PM
reply to post by rogerstigers

I recommend you read my previous post on this page, as the "Conquering ANY Disease" book has methods that have even reversed Diabetes TYPE I. It's even baffled medical physicians!

ALSO . . .

In general, one thing I KNOW reverses cancer is . . . breathing. Cancer cells cannot survive in an oxygen-rich environment. For that, I used "The Breathing Box" by Gay Hendricks. I'm currently using the "9-Breath Method" CD by Jeff Primac.

posted on Aug, 23 2010 @ 10:10 PM

Originally posted by Nivcharah
I recommend you read my previous post on this page, as the "Conquering ANY Disease" book has methods that have even reversed Diabetes TYPE I. It's even baffled medical physicians!

Noted and has already been a part of our lives in our own way for many years. We have always been very cognisant of what would happen if RNA-T manufacture of insulin was no longer possible, so this has been a very strong driver of our search for a cure or replacement therapy for type I diabetes.

Of course, I do not pay attention to anyone who is trying to sell a technique with a blender that they also happen to sell.
Been hoodwinked too many times.

[edit on 8-23-2010 by rogerstigers]

posted on Aug, 23 2010 @ 10:14 PM
Not only is big pharma not interested in a cure for cancer, they're not interested in a cure for ANYTHING.

Big Pharma is only interested in getting everyone on pills that they have to take for the rest of their lives, as a prevention or to lessen the symptoms of whatever ails them.

The last time a disease was actually cured, it was Polio in the 1950's. It was cured by an independant researcher and given to the world for free.

There's no profit in a cure for any disease - if it can be cured with a one time pill or a simple injection, how are they going to get ongoing payments? There is HUGE profit in making people take pills to lessen symptoms for the rest of their lives.

I was absolutely stunned by my doctor when I was diagnosed with Diabetes, Type II. His prescription was "lets get you on Metformin right away, but with weight loss, regular exercise, and diet control we should have you drug free within a year, and we want you off the medication as soon as possible, hopefully sooner than that".

Of course, I'm in Canada. Here our doctors seem to be all about curing things with as little drug interaction as possible, versus in the USA where they'll give you a pill for ANYTHING at the drop of a hat.

posted on Aug, 23 2010 @ 10:18 PM
reply to post by babybunnies

Very good post and a great example of how it is NOT necessarily the doctors that are the issue here (not all of them at least). If the doctors were all corrupt, why would Big Pharma have to advertise their meds on TV to convice us all that we absolutely NEED to go see our doctor and get such and such prescription.

posted on Aug, 23 2010 @ 11:09 PM
FANTASTIC POST, and you are right Ignoranceisntbliss

I'm very sorry to hear that your mother has lung cancer but it appears that she has a very strong ally in her court and it also appears that you have found a very real and passionate mission because of this - excellent job!

I too have been on this mission - I have Lymphoma (Hodgkin's disease) and Morgellons. It makes my heart sing when I see others stepping forward to share their experiences in a way that comes from strength and determination as opposed to allowing fear and helplessness to take over.

Everything that you have listed is very sound information and I personally use many of them. Funny how everything we need to get ourselves into BALANCE is all around us in nature but we seem to make it so confusing.

BALANCE IS THE ESSENCE OF LIFE......Mind, body, and spirit all in harmony - not easy sometimes, but I feel it's the journey of discovering how to achieve it that brings awareness which is the mother and seed of balance.

I am almost completely well and aside from my original blood work, I have not been helped, aided, or poisoned by a doctor - Yes, cancer is dead and right behind it.....slowly the control of our minds by a system of ruthless beings - I know there are good doctors out there but if they aren't leaning more in this direction then they are allowing themselves to be misguided. On the other hand, we too must take responsibility and educate ourselves instead of whining - don't give energy to negative people or things and they will slowly fade away and a new reality will take their place

I would like to add that we must keep in mind that fruits and veggies that are not organically grown lack enough nutrients to defeat an invasive cancer. They are also sprayed with poisons that leave trace amounts of residues on their skins resulting in continual ingestion of various poisons. We must try to get back to the basics.....grass roots, if you will..... the only way to guarantee how something is grown is to grow it yourself.

Skin: our skin is the largest organ of the body. Everything you put on it is absorbed and does affect us. If you simply trade out some of the poisons (perfume, cosmetics, deodorants) and substitute actual remedies then you will be well on your way to assisting the body to come back to a state of balance.

Things I have found very useful in eliminating cancer from my body:
GRAPEFRUIT SEED EXTRACT ( it is very bitter and I don't like the taste so I make a concentrated spray (6oz. distilled h2o/100 drops GSE) and after I shower and dry off, I spray my entire body down and then air dry.
LEMONGRASS (I grow it (super easy) and make big jugs of tea)
OREGANO (homegrown leaves as well as the essential oil)
COCONUT OIL (extra virgin not refined - yummmm!)
ALOE VERA (buy the big leaves, scrape the goo into a blender, add a half a lemon (squeezed) ice, water - blend and drink......good!)
ACTIVATED CHARCOAL (from coconut hulls)
OIL PULLING (coconut oil and unrefined sesame oil)

posted on Aug, 24 2010 @ 12:25 AM

Originally posted by rogerstigers

Of course, I do not pay attention to anyone who is trying to sell a technique with a blender that they also happen to sell.
Been hoodwinked too many times.

LOL! I can understand that and feel the same way, except in his seminar he tells us straight out, "I don't care where you buy the blender from because I don't make much off it anyway. If you can find one for less then buy it, but make it a 3HP blender. It makes a world of difference." (I found my blender on ebay for half the price.)

The main reason being how it masticates and cleaves out all the fibers of the plant foods which makes the phytochemicals easily available (the parts we usually throw away!); unlike our ancestors who had to chew their food for hours to achieve the same results.

This guy is really on the up-and-up. He walks his talk, which is a lot more than what I can say for any doctors I've ever had (drink/smoke/fat). Jeff Primack is onto something to reverse all diseases and all he's really selling you is the option to buy his 2 books I mentioned. No vitamins, herbs or anything else that is needed from him. He provides the info and it's up to you to do all the work to make it happen.

I'm not posting this just for you. I'm posting this information so all the other people on ATS who are looking for affordable options to actually reverse ANY disease. I'm offering them an chance at hope . . . IF they want to take it. If you think you're getting the same results by juicing . . . you're NOT.

BTW: I have a Jack Lalane Juicer for sale if anybody wants it.

posted on Aug, 24 2010 @ 01:09 AM
reply to post by ninthaxis

Having worked with many medical practitioners and specialists I can give you an idea of how it works from the inside.

Doctors are frustrated that their training and education is primarily treatment based.NOT prevention based.Unfortunately most patients present when they already have a problem.

Limited time with each patient prevents most doctors from providing lists of preventative foods based on family history as many would like to do so.

Many of the doctors I know now encourage patients to research foods that may be beneficial to their condition or to the prevention of hereditary conditions and to make an appointment to simply discuss the new diet.(the government pays the bill not the patient)

posted on Aug, 24 2010 @ 01:21 AM
reply to post by glitchinmymatrix

Breath man breath.

Originally posted by glitchinmymatrix
Acai berries? They aren't even a "superfood" much less a cancer cure.

Nice try.

All weapons in an arsenal.

Weapons are the 'cure' for resisting and overcoming violence.

No single weapon can achieve the total cure. Machine guns can't overcome tanks. Jets aren't the cure for submarines. Nukes aren't much good for a localized and internal uprising of armed thugs. But the right arsenal, with the right training and tactics, and any violence can be 'cured'.

There are different enemies with different strengths and weaknesses, on the battlefield, in the world, and in your body (both physically and metaphorically).

We know the weapons that can be achieved, but another enemy is keeping us from advancing to defeat that which profits them over us. This enemy is engaged in war with us politically, scientifically, mentally, physically, economically... and medically. No single weapon or tactic can overcome this enemy either.


In the meantime, take a good look at those entries. A good whole many of them had results in vivo, and many of those same ones have shown effectiveness against multiple lines and forms of cancer.

Even with the ones effective only in vitro, that's to say even if they only could be done that way hypothetically, that still brings us back to the lack of aggressiveness in finding the right delivery methods.

They do still make some powerful and effective treatments you say? I say they aren't good enough: most people still die from cancer... both in who gets it, and who dies in general.

Almost a trillion dollars a year goes into the cancer industry... where are the results?

I'll tell you what: don't eat any of that stuff, either before or during cancer. Just eat fries cooked well done and smothered in oyster sauce, drink cola, and smoke fire safe cigarettes. Avoid all of that snake oil. It doesn't matter anyways. Let's all just be cynical pessimists.

Originally posted by glitchinmymatrix
I hope nobody here really goes on to cure anyone with some cinnamon and vanilla tea sweetened with honey while smoking a joint!

That's an interesting statement. You "hope" that nobody does manage to do that? Vile.

[edit on 24-8-2010 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss]

posted on Aug, 24 2010 @ 02:58 AM
reply to post by IgnoranceIsntBlisss


I again commend you for your extremely informative thread.

Earlier today, I informed you that I would reply to you in detail.

In view of the possibly “personal" nature of the discussion, would you mind if I instead attempted to offer a little information from my “side” of things by U2U or “chat”?

Kind regards
Maybe…maybe not

posted on Aug, 24 2010 @ 03:13 AM
have you mentioned hyperthermic (and to a lesser extent hyperbaric) treatment options already?

i'll give you two links to start with,

while it's normally considered an additional measure to enhance other, more conventional, therapies (ray & chemo) there are studies which mention its use specifically on chemo resistant cancers.

the caveat is of course that this cannot be done safely without a lot of technology, due to the dangers of overheating. radio or microwave in conjunction with thermal control seems the most promising (imho) while direct blood heating is disgustingly primitive and just asking for trouble.

posted on Aug, 24 2010 @ 04:35 AM

Originally posted by glitchinmymatrix

This is a tactic I'm familiar with that involves presenting so much information that people really can't practically investigate the claims, and even if they wanted to, it would take weeks.

I hope nobody here really goes on to cure anyone with some cinnamon and vanilla tea sweetened with honey while smoking a joint!

For anyone who has been diagnosed with cancer, investigating the claims which are relative to their needs would not be a big deal. This is a fantastic index of information all in one place. I can't speak for all the cures, but there has been numerous research carried out which indicates cannabis contains substances which destroy cancer cells while not destroying health cells. This is available in scientific and medical journals. There are two reasons why the research is not taken further; big pharma (and the government) won't fund it and the legality of cannabis.

I would also hope nobody attempts to cure cancer by smoking a joint. The smoke from any combusted plant matter contains carcinogens (yet interestingly nobody has ever developed cancer as a result of cannabis consumption, maybe due to its anti-cancer properties?). Vast amounts of cannabinoids also need to be present in the bloodstream. Oral consumption is the best way to achieve this without becoming intoxicated. When the body gets used to it very large doses can be taken without intoxication (I also want to point out that it is not possible to overdose on cannabis). Another effect of oral consumption is the liver metabolizes some of the THC (the main psychoactive cannabinoid) into something else (I forget) which has cancer fighting properties.

More research is needed to be done to determine exactly how it works and which cannabinoids have cancer fighting properties and how they work together. The federal government likes to threaten universities with funding cuts if they attempt to research cannabis though. There's no profits in it for anyone else to research it. This doesn't mean people are not being cured with it though. I've gone through enough credible information that I would bet my life on cannabis if I was ever diagnosed with cancer.

Cancer patients are only given joints to smoke because it gives them an appetite (aka the munchies
) while chemo is poisoning their body.

posted on Aug, 24 2010 @ 09:45 AM

Thank you for such a great post. I have some books on all these plants and the cures for cancer you can access them for free at the following link :

Please Enjoy .

[edit on 24-8-2010 by lisa2012]

posted on Aug, 24 2010 @ 09:50 AM
Acai Berry stuff is a scam. Anything advertised on this website, don't click on it. It's all a scam based out of Utah and the Church of Latter Day Saints. Don't believe me? Google it, and find out for yourself.

top topics

<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in