It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Photography seems to steal spiritual energy away from a person.

page: 1
1
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 22 2010 @ 04:04 AM
link   
If there are notes within notes with in music, layers upon layers from bottom to top.
Just as a fractal continuously becomes itself over and over again, or a hologram being broken up into smaller and smaller pieces and still shows full hologram when a laser hits it. We just keep seeing smaller and smaller elements in the smallest things we know, as if it goes on for infinity, just as it can be big. I'm sure you have seen that poster where it shows the biggest star we know of next to our sun and our sun is a spec compared to it.

The theory is that if you snap a picture of someone or anything your stealing alittle of that person or things energy. Because for that picture to exist with the essence of what is in view on the picture it had to steal a few atoms, molecules, energy or whatever to put them on the photo.

You gotta think about it though, if everything is about slowness, slowing down, paying attention to the subtle things in life, from all forms of art, music, photography, film, dance, architecture, fashion including just everyday things in life such as driving, sharing a conversation, enjoying nature, taking pride in your everyday jobs and relationships with people.




posted on Aug, 22 2010 @ 04:11 AM
link   
I'm a soul thief!!! What happens thought if I draw someone or sculp someone? How about if I remember them? Or write their likeness on a paper?



posted on Aug, 22 2010 @ 04:13 AM
link   
While not being a psychics expert, I think in photography the energy used comes from light and a chemical reaction to that light.

So I think our souls are pretty safe for now.



posted on Aug, 22 2010 @ 04:16 AM
link   
what about movies then? I'd like to hear your thoughts about movies that are shot and then shown in theaters across the world, copied to DVDs where people watch over and over again. Maybe you can comment on movies watched illicitly on the web? if that ain't stealin I dont know what is!



posted on Aug, 22 2010 @ 04:19 AM
link   
What if you take a picture of a dead animal, what do i steal from it?



posted on Aug, 22 2010 @ 04:28 AM
link   
Everyone knows if you're a famous Hollywood actor you already sold your soul away.



posted on Aug, 22 2010 @ 04:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by 547000
Everyone knows if you're a famous Hollywood actor you already sold your soul away.


Damn it that was so good it should've been mine
2nd line



posted on Aug, 22 2010 @ 04:41 AM
link   
This is true about alot of mainstream artist that seemed to of sold there soul, so alittle piece leaves them with ever piece of media with there likeness on it goes out there, though lets say you got a picture taken to be put on a album, from there thats a certain amount of energy not alot to create a photo, and then thats copied and reproduced so its alittle less from each picture, movies take more of course, but we have alot of energy to spare.

This will bring up my next topic I will post on here shortly.

[edit on 22-8-2010 by phiktion]



posted on Aug, 22 2010 @ 04:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by Gloster
What if you take a picture of a dead animal, what do i steal from it?



His innocence, .... why, are you planning on changing your avatar ??



posted on Aug, 22 2010 @ 04:43 AM
link   

Originally posted by Gloster
What if you take a picture of a dead animal, what do i steal from it?


There are different levels of energy some of it is inanimate some is living, its just in a different configuration, some has intelligence, some doesnt but the stuff that flows through me and you also flows through a rock and a tree.

The soul of a dead animal is gone, thats a big portion of the energy, but the the matter which has no life still has energy flowing through it to keep its molecules and atoms configured in a solid state to lay there and decompose, it takes energy to keep those atoms together inside that dead animal.


[edit on 22-8-2010 by phiktion]



posted on Aug, 22 2010 @ 04:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by IntastellaBurst

Originally posted by Gloster
What if you take a picture of a dead animal, what do i steal from it?



His innocence, .... why, are you planning on changing your avatar ??

To give a piece of myself to the universal akashic record that is Above Top Secret.



posted on Aug, 22 2010 @ 04:48 AM
link   
And if you take a X-ray or a cat scan then you come out talking like schwarzenegger

*Mod Edit: Vid removed

[edit on 22-8-2010 by alien]



[edit on 22-8-2010 by Gloster]



posted on Aug, 22 2010 @ 04:48 AM
link   
Taking a picture of someone steals no more of their soul than simply looking at them does.



posted on Aug, 22 2010 @ 04:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by Hefficide
While not being a psychics expert, I think in photography the energy used comes from light and a chemical reaction to that light.

So I think our souls are pretty safe for now.


Light from a camera and the chemical reaction on lets say real photo not digital uses atoms and different waves and alot of high tech stuff I'm not aware of but it is still made out of the same things we are.



posted on Aug, 22 2010 @ 04:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by phiktion
Light from a camera and the chemical reaction on lets say real photo not digital uses atoms and different waves and alot of high tech stuff I'm not aware of but it is still made out of the same things we are.


Please stop... this post says it all.

Also, "Photography seems to steal spiritual energy away from a person"? No, it doesn't seem to do that at all, it's just your crackpot theory. Backing it up with planetary scale and holograms, even going as far as saying that photographs "steal a few atoms, molecules, energy or whatever to put them on the photo" is both misguided and flat out wrong.

[edit on 22-8-2010 by Abject]



posted on Aug, 22 2010 @ 04:59 AM
link   
reply to post by phiktion
 


The theory is rather plausible.

The notion that the picture "captures" a moment in time, including the emotions and feelings, has been around for centuries. Even David Icke has mentioned it in interviews and books.

A photograph can be symbolic of one's energy, according to the theory.



posted on Aug, 22 2010 @ 05:01 AM
link   
We are apparently returning to the Middle Ages... superstition prevailing over science. It is indeed the fall of Rome. File this with the threads where people question whether the earth rotates and why the moon always has a dark side.



posted on Aug, 22 2010 @ 05:02 AM
link   
The Dalai Lama is screwed then!

He spends every damn day in front of a camera.



posted on Aug, 22 2010 @ 05:04 AM
link   
Im sure the native americans believed something along the same lines so a lot of them refused to be photographed, i could be wrong though

MooseVernel

www.weddingphotographydirectory.com...



posted on Aug, 22 2010 @ 05:05 AM
link   
I think this theory would be plausible if you were,.... say


An Apache Indian on the frontier about 100 years ago !!


Like was said before, a photograph is made from light, light is bouncing around everywhere, right now as we speak, is that light capturing your soul ?? once it bounces off you it's gone, a picture captures nothing else, emotions, energy, none of that.



new topics

top topics



 
1
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join