It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Former FBI Agent Proves Oswald Didn't Kill Kennedy

page: 1
7

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 21 2010 @ 07:37 PM
link   
What do you think about this former FBI agent who is coming forward now with evidence that JFK was not killed by Oswald?

(Video)
*Snip*

It's pretty interesting and shows the corruption in the FBI that they didn't want ANYTHING coming out to go against the official fairy tale. The agent says the Warren Commission was nothing put a PACK of lies!

I believe the main reason JFK was killed was a few months earlier he had started phasing out the private bank Federal Reserve owned by the Rothschilds and Rockefellers. He had already pulled by all the $5 bills from the Federal Reserve system and those said "US Treasury Notes" instead of "Federal Reserve Notes".

As soon as Johnson got in there, all that was reversed and they piled on more debt for the bankers and no President since has even tried to end the Federal Reserve slavery system. They've all worked for the bankers and kept the slavery to the bankers going without even a peep about how evil it is to the American people.


Mod Edit: Removed Website Link

[edit on 8/21/2010 by semperfortis]




posted on Aug, 21 2010 @ 07:47 PM
link   
JFK had a speech about secret societies ...

www.youtube.com...

I guess he made alot of friends after that speech.

Peace

[edit on 21-8-2010 by Vicodin]



posted on Aug, 21 2010 @ 08:01 PM
link   
reply to post by Vicodin
 


He was not talking about NWO, Masons, Illuminatti....
He was talking about the need for the press to be responsible and not print things that could help the USSR during the Cold War. The speech was just after the disastrous Bay of Pigs.



posted on Aug, 21 2010 @ 08:03 PM
link   
reply to post by projectnsearch
 


I suppose it's possible, but only if the guy had connections to the CIA or FBI itself. I see no way that anyone could have killed Kennedy and then made the government cover it up and seal the records. The government or intelligence agencies had to be involved.



posted on Aug, 21 2010 @ 08:07 PM
link   
In my opinion, Johnson had the most gain from JFKs death.

JFKs death was literally the only way LBJ could attain Presidency.

I do not think the fed reserve had anything to do with it.

I think it boils down to simple greed and power lust.



posted on Aug, 21 2010 @ 08:27 PM
link   
reply to post by hotbakedtater
 


You may be on the right track, but who was the triggerman?



posted on Aug, 21 2010 @ 08:40 PM
link   
Had to be the CIA that disappeared JFK after the conflict over Cuba. There are some declassified tapes at the Kennedy library that recorded his views about the arms race and the Cuban missile crisis. You can read between the lines fairly easily from listening to those tapes laughter from the audience etc.



posted on Aug, 21 2010 @ 09:47 PM
link   
reply to post by hotbakedtater
 


The vice pres always has the most to gain with an assasination, doesn't mean he was behind it.

I don't know who was behind it, but it was a bunch of people, possibly 100.



posted on Aug, 21 2010 @ 10:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by hotbakedtater
In my opinion, Johnson had the most gain from JFKs death.

JFKs death was literally the only way LBJ could attain Presidency.

I do not think the fed reserve had anything to do with it.

I think it boils down to simple greed and power lust.


I think you could be onto something. If you can not get elected president jump onto the coat tail of someone who can and then kill them off! Bust tried it with Reagan and failed!



posted on Aug, 22 2010 @ 02:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by InvisibleAlbatross
reply to post by hotbakedtater
 


You may be on the right track, but who was the triggerman?


There was a few shooters in Dallas that day.

Oswald was not one of them.

Several ppl reported the powder flash from the grassy knoll.

They have film showing the kinetic energy of the killing shot
moving his head back and to the left.

Following that motion back to its origin places it on the grassy knoll
or possibly the rail road bridge.

Physics do not lie.

If you want to see how much of a circus of lies it was back
then I recommend you watch Oliver Stones film JFK.

There are some JFK conspiracy films out there on the torrents
as well and not all are created equal but some good info out
there you just have to sort the chaff out.





[edit on 22-8-2010 by Ex_MislTech]



posted on Aug, 23 2010 @ 12:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by InvisibleAlbatross
reply to post by hotbakedtater
 


You may be on the right track, but who was the triggerman?


I don't know, it has been a while (decade?) since I was heavy into the conspiracy. I have over twenty books some hard to find out of print, about the Kennedies, and the conspiracy. I would have to take a few days and go back over everything to try and postulate an answer.

LBJ was an awfully dirty politician, he had an awful lot of friends(ha) in low places.



posted on Aug, 23 2010 @ 01:33 PM
link   
www.masterjules.net...


and hired Corsican LUCIEN SARTI the sharpshooter who did the actual work. And not from that window in Dealey Plaza!



posted on Aug, 23 2010 @ 02:31 PM
link   
Isn't this thread kind of useless without the link to the site that has the former agent explaining who really did it?

Why would the link be removed? Or is this part of the conspiracy?

..Ex



posted on Aug, 24 2010 @ 12:51 AM
link   
reply to post by v3_exceed
 


Very odd. I would like to know why a mod would remove it.



posted on Aug, 24 2010 @ 01:11 AM
link   
IMO why JFK was shot: is he was to ready to use nukes, that scared the you know what out of TPTB and they could not have this, not yet. things we know about this; one the bullet .two the eye witnesses. three the audio recordings of the police radios. four to many wounds made by one bullet. this is just that start of the known, what about the unknown? Did Castro have a CIA /MOB tie to the "hit" was Russia in on it,( i have not read the books so i may be asking the known, but to me the unknown)so forgive me if i am.



posted on Aug, 26 2010 @ 08:44 AM
link   
I, too, would like to know why the link was removed. This is of interest to me and I wouldl ike to see all the available information, even if bogus, so that I may draw my own conclusions.



posted on Aug, 26 2010 @ 08:50 AM
link   
Every president that has tried to mint coin as it states in the constitution has been assassinated apparently...thats 4, plus Jackson whom they tried to assasinate but failed.



posted on Aug, 26 2010 @ 08:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by Ex_MislTech

Originally posted by InvisibleAlbatross
reply to post by hotbakedtater
 


You may be on the right track, but who was the triggerman?


There was a few shooters in Dallas that day.

Oswald was not one of them.

Several ppl reported the powder flash from the grassy knoll.

They have film showing the kinetic energy of the killing shot
moving his head back and to the left.

Following that motion back to its origin places it on the grassy knoll
or possibly the rail road bridge.

Physics do not lie.

If you want to see how much of a circus of lies it was back
then I recommend you watch Oliver Stones film JFK.

There are some JFK conspiracy films out there on the torrents
as well and not all are created equal but some good info out
there you just have to sort the chaff out.





[edit on 22-8-2010 by Ex_MislTech]


The "back and to the left" notion, made so much more popular by the Stone film you mention, is debatable at best.

I dont think Oswald was the only shooter that day, if he even fired, HOWEVER I truly feel that our energies are misdirected at the grassy knoll shooter. YES, the President's head goes back and to the left, but only after moving forward. he forward movement isnt as obvious, but it is more consistent with the movement one would expect from a bullet impact.

Consider also that had a shot been fired from the knoll, Jackie would most likely have been injured or killed, and the back LEFT side of the President's head would be blown out. Instead what we have is the back RIGHT side.

A shot from the knoll matches neither the physical evidence, nor the witness testimony from that day. I think the focus on the alleged knoll shooter has kept us from finding the real truth.



posted on Aug, 27 2010 @ 10:31 AM
link   
There is a another thread about this topic
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Closed.



new topics

top topics



 
7

log in

join