It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
the Saudis -- by their own admission -- have spent 87 BILLION dollars promoting the spread of Wahhabism/Islam in the West
Originally posted by americandingbat
Telling them that they can't build on private land that they own not at the WTC site but blocks away is at least making the area an no-mosque zone.
it's not scheduled to be opened on 9/11/11,
So why is it that most of the opposition is coming from people who don't live near where this will be built?
The proposal to move the cultural center is only reasonable if someone can suggest a location in the neighborhood where they plan to build as an alternative.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
This country is crazy and many of the people are quite stupid and bigoted, and they try to disguise their bigotry behind ideas like "being more sensitive" and 'compromise".
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by americandingbat
it's not scheduled to be opened on 9/11/11,
That's the date that the TV news gave (multiple channels). If you have information that says otherwise ... great! A non-911 opening would be much better.
Rauf said the mosque will not open on the anniversary of 9/11, and that it will take between 18 months and three years before the money is raised to open the center at the old Burlington Coat Factory building on Park Place, which was damaged on 9/11.
From what I've read New Yorkers don't want it near Ground Zero.
Legally only NYC can decide what to do with this, but Americans WILL have an opinion on it because 9/11 touched them all.
The proposal to move the cultural center is only reasonable if someone can suggest a location in the neighborhood where they plan to build as an alternative.
That would be great. But is it a 'neighborhood' center or is it a 'cultural center' in which people from the whole city would be partaking of? Did the $$$ for it come from that neighborhood or other sources outside of it. Kinda makes a difference.
Originally posted by Dock9
Not everyone who posts here has one iota of loyalty to the US or to Western society
Peyser also reports — falsely — that Cordoba House's opening date will be Sept. 11, 2011.
We are in the preliminary planning stages of the center and the timeline has yet to be determined..
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Since those were my exact words when I suggested that the cultural center could be moved to a different location to appease everyone and keep the peace in an overcrowded city ... would you explain to me how exactly that win'win compromise is stupid and bigoted? Thank you.
Originally posted by Dock9
It is deliberate provocation
Any muslim who would support the mosque would be spitting in the face of their hosts
The third party which is engineering and orchestrating this debacle
is working like mad to usher in 'religious wars' between Christianity and Islam -- and between the West and the East
and that is in order to create their insane 'rapture' and 'Armageddon'
(once they can arrange their elusive messiah and once they can locate a red cow, etc. etc. )
So why not build a synagogue right next to the proposed mosque ?
And then how about we all contribute to the erection of a mosque in downtown Tel Aviv to demonstrate 'unity' ?
Originally posted by Dock9
Any muslim who would support the mosque would be spitting in the face of their hosts
and that is in order to create their insane 'rapture' and 'Armageddon'
(once they can arrange their elusive messiah and once they can locate a red cow, etc. etc. )
So why not build a synagogue right next to the proposed mosque ?
And then how about we all contribute to the erection of a mosque in downtown Tel Aviv to demonstrate 'unity' ?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
To have a compromise, both sides must be willing to give a little.
if you found a piece of land that you loved and could afford and wanted to build a house on it, and the people of America didn't want you to because of your religion, would you be willing to compromise and be sensitive to America's desires? Even if the majority of people who lived around the area wanted you there?
Originally posted by FlyersFan
True. The muslims could build elsewhere. That could be their compromise as 'sensitive' New Yorkers .. and the other group could compromise and not oppose the building where it is.
Originally posted by Kram09
It's sad.
This is what you Americans have been reduced to. Suspicious, bigoted and paranoid.
Also what's with the labels being thrown around all the time?
Liberal this, Liberal that.....
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
So, people don't approve, but agree that they have the Constitutional right.
Originally posted by ollncasino
The constitution gives Muslims no right to spread their religion.
It merely prevents congress from interfering in religious freedom.
It doesn't remove rights from secular campaigners who oppose the expansion of an intolerant religion.
Originally posted by fooks
funny, most of these people here are not american, i bet.