It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ArmorOfGod
Originally posted by jmdewey60
I haven't looked into any other current models out there that anyone is supporting.
You should look into the neo-tychonian model with a non-rotating Earth fixed in the centre of the universe.
It's the easiest to defend. Trust me.
A spinning Earth cannot be defended in the light of real experimentation.
Go here and study all the material:
The only way out of for you in light of this evidence is to claim some sort of special status for the earth because of your faith in a Bronze Age book about some Jewish wizard pufftting the earth into existence
Originally posted by racasan
You just gave yourself away – you have no interest in the truth it’s just about you defending a Bronze Age book of non-sense
Originally posted by rnaa
It demonstrates that the assertion that NASA calculates flight plans to the planets based on a geocentric model is hogwash.