Originally posted by EspyderMan
People who go around praising the chicks and this site without question, are a bunch of sheeple, yes this means you! if ATS told you to jump, you
would ask how high and how many times!
yes, yes, i go along with ATS on each and every issue unquestionably, and i never say anything against them, mods, or staff. (sarcasm)
6th post here, scroll down:
can you please quote me in this thread and demonstrate where i "put down" someone for their views if their views where not "put downs" themselves
devoid of any constructive criticism or any criticism offered the Conspiracy Chicks' TEAM (to include the 3 guys) could actually do something
and, yes, i have offered them criticism and provided "negative feedback" on a couple issues. but these were observations, opinions, personal
preferences i shared, and most of all Suggestions
on how they might better the program.
criticism is not synonymous with negativity.
but negative criticism is synonymous with: "here is the problem, there is not viable sollution" or "here is what i think, but i'm offering no
suggestions on how to fix it."
some of your statements made in those two posts are just plain disfunctional (imo), and i may respond to some of that, but i don't want to derail
what this thread is about:
the Conspiracy Chicks Project
Criticism that offers suggestions, not just views from amateurish critics
praise, and compliments for the teams work
the actual stories covered in the story
this thread is not about me
this thread is not about you
but, this thread is about our views, and how we think we can make OUR ATS
a better community and a better environment.
i'm not going to address some of what you said here.
i'll take a look at your profile page, find where you post, go read your threads, get to know something more about you, and then engage ya.