It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TrueBrit
For instance , if a poster provides a picture with an unknown object on it, and asks , "What the crap is it?" then a skeptic has no reason to reply!!!
Further more, when someone tells you "This is what happened" and it takes what seems to be the whole ten thousand character limit in order to say it, then you can bet your butt that any request for more information will be met with confusion... something along the lines of "What the hell did I just write all that out for, if ignorant mooks arent even going to look at it !?".
In short , theres nothing wrong with skepticism as long as it waits its turn and pays attention... in all other cases it will be shot on sight.
Originally posted by TrueBrit
reply to post by ArMaP
...See to my mind you yourself are not a skeptic. You are merely a person who examines things deeply. And you arent biased in your musings as I expect skeptics to be. Most importantly you arent afraid of the gaps in your knowlege, and from what I understand you actively seek those gaps and fill them with as much as you can get hold of, being an inquisitive sort of a chap. Those qualities are specificaly NOT those of a traditional skeptic...
Originally posted by TrueBrit
For instance , if a poster provides a picture with an unknown object on it, and asks , "What the crap is it?" then a skeptic has no reason to reply!
Originally posted by TrueBrit
In short , theres nothing wrong with skepticism as long as it waits its turn and pays attention... in all other cases it will be shot on sight. Thank you for your time.
Originally posted by TrueBrit
Skepticism kept us out of the loop for hundreds of years on that one!!!
Originally posted by TrueBrit
It could therefore be said that the minority of genuine skeptics have to be reclassified due to thier original name being widely stolen by other less reputable persons.
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
I agree with almost all, but not every word, of this essay -- however, I totally agree with the basic sentiment:
Main Entry: skep•ti•cism
Pronunciation: \ˈskep-tə-ˌsi-zəm\
Function: noun
Date: 1646
1 : an attitude of doubt or a disposition to incredulity either in general or toward a particular object
2 a : the doctrine that true knowledge or knowledge in a particular area is uncertain b : the method of suspended judgment, systematic doubt, or criticism characteristic of skeptics
3 : doubt concerning basic religious principles (as immortality, providence, and revelation)
synonyms see uncertainty
source: www.merriam-webster.com...
___________________________________________________________
Entry Word: skepticism
Function: noun
Meaning: a feeling or attitude that one does not know the truth, truthfulness, or trustworthiness of someone or something — see doubt
___________________________________________________________
Entry Word: skeptical
Function: adjective
Meaning: 1 inclined to doubt or question claims
Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by Esoteric Teacher
You forgot one:
ATSers have the right to be treated respectfully, regardless of their opinions.
Originally posted by m0r1arty
...Those who make these claims need to back them up other wise we'd all be looking for wee willy winkey.
I'll give you that proof of argument is required at each end of the spectrum but if you are claiming something then you better have something to show for it...
...there certainly is more of an onus on the person making the extraordinary claim rather than on the "skeptic" who is suggesting other mundane explanations.