reply to post by stereologist
My position towards the 2012 issue is highly ''neutral'' - I will freely admit that I am on the fence.
I am completely open to the idea that something ''big'' may happen to our planet & civilization in the near future, and that there may be groups
of people in the ''know'' that have been preparing for such an event for a long time now. I'm also very open to the idea that certain information
is kept ''hidden'' away from the public.
I have always strived to make an effort to look over both sides of any issue, in this case 2012/Planet X/ect.
While you may confuse me and probably others as ''jump-on-the-bandwagon, blind faith, believe everything I read'' types of people, I can say for
myself that this is not the case!
When I say that I agree with Lucus that something ''fishy'' is going on - that is exactly what I mean. It may be a ''goofy'' concept or idea
to you, but it isn't to me - what it boils down to is simply a difference of opinion.
I can appreciate your standpoint Stereo, even though it's quite far from my own.
Regardless of whether or not you are affiliated with a 2012-hoax website, working for NASA, a government employee, a scientist or even a paid
disinformation agent - it's highly irrelevant to me. I could honestly care less what your ''job title'' is - What I do care about are your true
motives/intentions in posting here as much as you have against the issue.
Am I accusing you of anything directly? No, but I have my suspicions.
Generally, I would question anybody who joins and posts in ATS just to ''attack'' others over their views, beliefs and opinions towards a rather
controversial topic, such as Planet X/2012/ect. Again, anybody can look at your posting track history, and the rest speaks for itself in this case.
If your choice is to refuse to answer my question about whether or not you're affiliated with the 2012 hoax website, then so be it.
Thanks for appreciating my posts.
Also know that I mean no disrespect or ill will towards those whose intentions/motives within ATS and elsewhere are ''pure'' and ''honest'' in
I recognize that this post is another off-topic post/reply, but I felt I needed to post it, regardless.