Lucus And The Return Of Planet X!

page: 30
23
<< 27  28  29   >>

log in

join

posted on Jun, 22 2011 @ 01:37 PM
link   
reply to post by walkinglucid
 


Hurry up and get 20 posts.
I want to hear your interesting story.




posted on Jun, 22 2011 @ 01:50 PM
link   
reply to post by CodyOutlaw
 


I'm working on it. I have posted it many times in other places - but people find it of little interest. Yes its interesting, but does not draw any scientific based conclusions. Its just one of those
moments.



posted on Jun, 22 2011 @ 03:45 PM
link   
reply to post by walkinglucid
 



Its very simple. Your deductive reasoning and interpretation has lead you to believe there is, as you said, a "mundane explanation" for the occurrence of spiral petroglyphs all around the world. My deductive reasoning, interpretation, and conclusions have lead me to believe that the answer is not so mundane - that the explanation is much more extraordinary that we would typically imagine.

Why do you state that you are using deductive reasoning? I simply stated that a more mundane explanation exists. It does. Spiral petroglyphs are not the sole geometric design in use. Parallel lines and grids are drawn as well.

A single paper is nothing more than a proposal. What was the feedback on that paper? Surely there was feedback, either positive or negative. All the paper appears to do is to suggest that the petroglyphs might represent an external image.

Even if that were true, it certainly is unrelated to a failed launch of an ICBM as Lucus suggests.



posted on Jun, 22 2011 @ 07:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by walkinglucid
reply to post by CodyOutlaw
 


I'm working on it. I have posted it many times in other places - but people find it of little interest. Yes its interesting, but does not draw any scientific based conclusions. Its just one of those
moments.



Yeah, but I like that kind of story.
Send me a message when you make a thread.



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 08:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by walkinglucid
 



Its very simple. Your deductive reasoning and interpretation has lead you to believe there is, as you said, a "mundane explanation" for the occurrence of spiral petroglyphs all around the world. My deductive reasoning, interpretation, and conclusions have lead me to believe that the answer is not so mundane - that the explanation is much more extraordinary that we would typically imagine.

Why do you state that you are using deductive reasoning? I simply stated that a more mundane explanation exists. It does. Spiral petroglyphs are not the sole geometric design in use. Parallel lines and grids are drawn as well.

A single paper is nothing more than a proposal. What was the feedback on that paper? Surely there was feedback, either positive or negative. All the paper appears to do is to suggest that the petroglyphs might represent an external image.

Even if that were true, it certainly is unrelated to a failed launch of an ICBM as Lucus suggests.


What ever you say Stereo. Your wording is a little confusing. To my knowledge, LUCUS has never suggested that these spirals are related to the failed launch of an ICBM. He has always concluded that it must have been the result of a cosmic event. I will not argue this point with you - Thanks for your input though! You are entitled to your opinion.



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 08:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by CodyOutlaw

Originally posted by walkinglucid
reply to post by CodyOutlaw
 


I'm working on it. I have posted it many times in other places - but people find it of little interest. Yes its interesting, but does not draw any scientific based conclusions. Its just one of those
moments.



Yeah, but I like that kind of story.
Send me a message when you make a thread.


Well, seeing as this is my 20th post - I will type it up now!



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 09:01 AM
link   
reply to post by walkinglucid
 



What ever you say Stereo. Your wording is a little confusing. To my knowledge, LUCUS has never suggested that these spirals are related to the failed launch of an ICBM. He has always concluded that it must have been the result of a cosmic event. I will not argue this point with you - Thanks for your input though! You are entitled to your opinion.

It is true that Lucus looks foolish when he claims that the spiral in Norway was anything other than a failed ICBM launch. He looks even more foolish when he suggests that the president was there.



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 02:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by walkinglucid
 



What ever you say Stereo. Your wording is a little confusing. To my knowledge, LUCUS has never suggested that these spirals are related to the failed launch of an ICBM. He has always concluded that it must have been the result of a cosmic event. I will not argue this point with you - Thanks for your input though! You are entitled to your opinion.

It is true that Lucus looks foolish when he claims that the spiral in Norway was anything other than a failed ICBM launch. He looks even more foolish when he suggests that the president was there.


You just don't quit - do you?



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 08:35 PM
link   
reply to post by walkinglucid
 


Do you have anything to show that Lucus is correct when he suggests that the Russians would never have fired a missile over Norway with the president there?

1. The president was not in Norway
2. The missile was fired over the White Sea and not Norway
3. The launch was announced beforehand with a no-fly zone for the test area
4. This was not the only failure of the missile type

Clearly Lucus misrepresented the situation.



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 01:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by rajaten
 


I could write all sorts of stupid mumbo jumbo about these paintings. I could write nonsense just like all of the conspiracy wackos. Instead I will provide the words of the artist.

DIA Conspiracies Take Off
They wanted to know about all the different symbols in the murals that he'd been commissioned to make for the still-unopened DIA. "And I explained it like I explain it to everybody," the artist says. The first part of the environmental mural is about the ways that humans destroy nature and themselves through destruction and genocide. The second part is about humanity coming together to rehabilitate nature and revive their own compassion

The last thing Tanguma wants is for viewers to mistake his meaning

Artist Leo Tanguma doesn't understand how conspiracy theorists find hidden messages in his mural on environmentalism.


And that one statement alone is proof as far as i'm concerned that Mr T. is either lying or a total moron.


Originally posted by stereologist
The artist maintains the works have nothing to do with Illuminati's plans for one world government, but the internet, in all it's glory, is rife with people who won't be convinced.


yeah right, the "artist maintains" HA HA HA! but gee, what would you expect him to say anyway? an official press release to America? "Yes, its true, After my many years of faithful allegiance to the Illuminati, i've been commissioned out to create a mural that represents armageddon, coming Martial Law and the NWO agenda through a series of fire and brimstone scenes in a PUBLIC GOVERNMENT facility (major US Intl Airport)".

of course, what was i thinking?... why would a secret society/the Illuminati have any reason or need to use symbolism, numerology and hidden codes etc? There's no evidence whatsoever such a group exists or these tactics have ever been used


This is the same attitude and type of game that was devised to pull off 9/11. a LIE so big and obvious, it could always be dismissed and ridiculed as a crazy conspiracy theory and the people would be too stupid to see it, and controlled or brainwashed do anything about it.

the DIA murals are so blatantly obvious to anyone with half a brain what they're depicting.
Its just more evidence of the illuminati's sick twisted humor, game, and arrogance.

talk about writing a bunch of stupid mumbo jumbo... the artist himself just gave new meaning to it.



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 02:02 PM
link   
reply to post by truthseekr1111
 



And that one statement alone is proof as far as i'm concerned that Mr T. is either lying or a total moron.

Clearly the artist knows more about the art than you or Lucus. You might vilify him for speaking the truth about his art, but that's okay. Your comments do not change the situation that the art has nothing whatsoever to do with the insane claims made by people that in some way this person is associated with or represents or was hired by the NWO.

It is a rather ludicrous idea a secret society would leave clues around. That is what apophenia is all about, people seeing patterns where none exists. It is also about an inability to accept that there is nothing out there. The silly claims range from the swastika shape - utter nonsense - to the art.


the DIA murals are so blatantly obvious to anyone with half a brain what they're depicting.

So why is that people develop the nitwit idea that these murals depict anything other than what the artist states? As you suggest, anyone with half a brain should be able to see that the artist depicted what he states.



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 07:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by walkinglucid

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by walkinglucid
 



What ever you say Stereo. Your wording is a little confusing. To my knowledge, LUCUS has never suggested that these spirals are related to the failed launch of an ICBM. He has always concluded that it must have been the result of a cosmic event. I will not argue this point with you - Thanks for your input though! You are entitled to your opinion.

It is true that Lucus looks foolish when he claims that the spiral in Norway was anything other than a failed ICBM launch. He looks even more foolish when he suggests that the president was there.


You just don't quit - do you?


Why should he quit? He's one of the few pointing out that the entire 2012 Niburu stuff is nothing but a new age religion not based on any real facts. You might just as well believe in talking snakes and people surviving in whales...oh wait...that would be Christians


Please people, wake up, we live in the 21st century...start researching and asking for facts rather than buying into the next best fad people trick you into believing. For crying out loud, use your brains!!



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 09:10 PM
link   
reply to post by MrXYZ
 


MrXYZ I am astonished! My snake was telling me about the difficulties of navigating plumbing systems ... oooops I assume you did not mean that type of snake.

Never mind.





new topics
 
23
<< 27  28  29   >>

log in

join