posted on Aug, 16 2010 @ 12:45 PM
There would also be no "moral laws", with this I mean laws that are purely based on religion and their morals. As for example laws on prostitution,
nudism, homosexuality and so forth. You pray in your home, church or mosque but beyond those zone limits, everything goes.
Let me explain a bit on the issues of law. A lot of laws are not designed for actual "protection" but for control and a lot of them have their
"morality" based on religion. I would return to natural laws. This means that every species, be it a man eating shark or some bacteria or us
humans have the rules and regulations embedded in us by nature. I do not need a law stating that one shall not kill, it is NATURAL that one does not
kill one's own species. Only a twisted psychopath will kill his own children and cook them for breakfast and so forth. Only a psychopath will enjoy
the thrill of raping someone behind the bushes in the park. Laws that regulate safety, as like building-codes and so forth make sense as
"regulation" to ensure a harmonious and safe life for all.
Naturally I am also a nudist and strongly support this healthy lifestyle. And there now comes the issue. So many clamor about setting a limit as to
what the "Muslims" should be allowed to do. Well the answer is simple. Instead of putting more laws into the books, more restrictions and so forth
there are many "Softer ways" to "discourage" people from settling near you.
During the late 60's and 70's, Germany had a large "guest worker" population mostly from Turkey, - which is a Muslim country. These were also the
times where nudism was at its peak. Strangely enough, most Turks left after their 5 year stay and did NOT apply for permanent immigration. WHY? Very
simply! They for sure enjoyed the topless beaches and so, BUT would never permit nor tolerate that their own wife and daughters would be "exposed to
For some time, just after the Iranian-US hostage taking I was working for a personnel company that sent engineers out to all projects world wide. I
could have made 3 times the money IF I had agreed to go to Iran or Saudi Arabia than to other locations. I refused! Simply because if this county's
laws deny me the right to enjoy a good beer or wine after a hard day's work, then I don't need their money, and if I can't be nude at their
beaches, then they do not need my tourist $$$.
However during the 80's onwards the RRR or Radical Religious Right wanted to stem these "immoral ways" of this 60's and 70's generation and so
they clamped down on nudity, on sexual freedoms and so forth and strangely enough even went to bed with their Muslim bedfellows. During the UN
conference in the 90's on population control, the Catholic Church and the Muslims joined forces to oppress the use of contraceptives and abortion.
Also Catholics and Muslims are pretty much ideologically "dog and cats".
Now the "free nude beaches" are gone mostly and one has to be more or less a member of a club or resort to enjoy this lifestyle. No more topless in
the parks or at the river front. Yet NOW the people scream that they are sick an tired of seeing them Muslim women all covered up and that they are
"over run" by these "invaders".
The West's own resurgence of Prudery and Puritanical thinking and "morality" has "enabled others" to flock to these countries.
Nothing makes a religious zealot run faster than a open minded and free living society. I for example, when facing Mormon Missionaries, use a simple
trick. Mormons send some handsome looking late teen males for their mission. I admit that they do have in quite handsome young men. I also KNOW that
the Mormons are maybe the most homophobic group of so called Christians. To get rid of them, all I do is ask them out for a hot "3-some". They run
faster than the best Olympic champion sprinters. NO deeply religious person will raise their kids in a society that accepts LGBT relations, nudity
etc. That's how you stops mosques from being built.