Do you mean in the Halt tape??
If so then here it is....(sorry if not)...
The full tape
Google Video Link |
And yeah, I can remember reading about that as well, apparently the pulsing of the object that they was seeing was apparently almost exactly the same as the lighthouse which seems to have given the lighthouse theory a lot of credibility IMO.
But as far as I'm aware and contrary to what many believe you can in fact see the lighthouse in Rendlesham forest, but you can only see it in certain locations.
Look at these 2 images below for example...
Even from such a short distance you seem to be able to see the lighthouse and then suddenly it's seemingly gone which could explain how the object disappeared.
But then again how does it explain them seeing the object from the base itself moving into the forest and then the men seeing the object up close and then shooting off into the sky?
Anyway, this is what the lighthouse apparently looks like at night.
Doesn't seem like it could make much difference anyway IMO as the object would see far away and not close like the men claim it was.
Oh and speaking of what the men say, here's what they say about the lighthouse theory itself...
John Burroughs - Airmen first class at time - present on first night
"There is no way that many people were fooled by that lighthouse...There is just no way that we were fooled, something actually went on on out there."
Jim Penniston - Staff Sergeant at time - present on first night
[Arguing with Vince Thurkettle] "You know, we've worked out here for months. We know where the lighthouse is, it's just so ridiculous to bring that up."
Charles Halt - Deputy base commander at time - present on second night
"The whole time this was going on, we could see the lighthouse, the lighthouse was about 33-35 degrees off where this object was this seen....A lighthouse doesn't move through the forest, the lighthouse doesn't go up and down, it doesn't explode, doesn't change shape, size, doesn't send down beams of light from the sky."
Edward Cabansag - Airman at time - present on first night
"It [the UFO] was to the right of the lighthouse" "... It wasn't the lighthouse."
Charles Halt - Deputy base commander at time - present on second night
"I knew where the lighthouse was. This thing was not it. I saw the lighthouse as well but I never mentioned it [on the tape]. Why should I? Everybody present knew what that was!"
"A lighthouse doesn’t move through the forest; the lighthouse doesn’t go up and down, it doesn’t explode, doesn’t change shape, size - doesn’t send down beams of light from the sky”.
"I don't want to talk to people that tell me I was looking at the lighthouse... I could see the lighthouse... I knew where the lighthouse was. That's ludicrous."
"They [the sceptics] weren't there that night, I certainly wish some of them had been - they might have had a different opinion of things. But they're entitled to their opinion, they certainly are. I know what happened. I was there."
Steve La Plume - Airmen first class at time - present on second or third night
"I mean, come on here, this is not rocket science. I saw something, Busty [Adrian Bustinza] saw something, [Larry] Warren saw something.
Everyone there saw something. Perhaps on different nights, perhaps with a different perspective but we did not see a light house and mistake it for a bloody UFO.
[...] I am personally offended by the fact that anyone can even think that we are so stupid as to believe what we saw was a dammed light house[...]"
Larry Warren - A1C - present on second or third night
"The British press always brings up astronomer Ian Ridpath's insane lighthouse theory as the cause of the UFO incidents. USAF security police are highly trained people, and I'm sure all Bentwaters veterans must find Ridpath's ramblings insulting in the extreme".
Gregory Battram - A1C at time - present on second/third night
"I just wish I knew why those things landed and what they wanted - isn't that the most important question? No lighthouses and theories from people who don't have a clue..."
Vince Thurkettle - forester at time - first to suggest the lighthouse theory.(Source)
He spoke to Georgina Bruni, "they [the sceptics] take a cluster of facts and only pick up on those that suit the situation"
Even the lighthouse keeper does not subscribe to the lighthouse theory.
He spoke to Georgina Bruni, "... some time the skeptics have been pestering me in an attempt to get to support their theory. I cannot do it. I know what my lighthouse looked like from the forest. I have seen it in all weathers. It just could not do what those airmen and local people describe the UFO as doing..."
Personally I don’t believe in the lighthouse theory but if you can give me a reason to do so then I’ll be more than happy to change my mind but I just can't see them confusing 2 (possibly 3) nights of events with a lighthouse miles away.







