It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Byrd
I think that its position 2 blocks away from the site is not a problem. There's Catholic church right at the edge of the property. I would encourage a Jewish synagogue as well or a Wiccan grove or any other religion's house of worship in that same area.
Originally posted by Byrd
Originally posted by hadriana
The fact is it can be perceived as a victory monument.
I have heard this before, and the thing that popped into my mind was "so can all the Christian churches on Native American reservations (which were forced on them and they were brutalized so that their religion was almost destroyed.)"
There are other examples of this... once you get that sort of mindset, then the Christian churches in nonChristian nations can be seen as victory monuments as well. It's kind of creepy to me and I'm sure the Christian pastors might disagree.
Originally posted by LuckyStrike
I say nay.
I'm curious though, are there any Japanese restaurants near Pearl Harbor?
Originally posted by LuckyStrike
I say nay.
I'm curious though, are there any Japanese restaurants near Pearl Harbor?
But several people familiar with the debate among New York's Islamic activists now claim that the leaders are convinced abandoning the site is preferable to unleashing a wave of bitterness towards Muslims.
They also hope the move will be seen as a show of sensitivity to families of the victims of the 9/11 attacks, and to the American public generally.
Originally posted by Fractured.Facade
If this is true, it is a very wise move...
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by Fractured.Facade
If this is true, it is a very wise move...
You think backing down, selling out, giving up is a wise move??? Man.... That's pretty sad.
Originally posted by americandingbat
Originally posted by Byrd
I think that its position 2 blocks away from the site is not a problem. There's Catholic church right at the edge of the property. I would encourage a Jewish synagogue as well or a Wiccan grove or any other religion's house of worship in that same area.
According to Google maps, there are two synagogues within two blocks of the WTC site, as well as the Catholic church I think you mean (at the corner of the block where the new community center will be), an Episcopal chapel (right across the street), and hopefully someday the rebuilt St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox church (which was crushed when the South Tower fell on it).
A Wiccan grove would be an interesting idea, though I'm not sure what the requirements are. There's not a lot of trees down there
On-topic:
Officially, I abstain. I live five miles away, it's not part of my community, and I think that decisions about what belongs in a community should be made by that community. The Park51/Cordoba House project has the support of the neighborhood that it will be in, I think that should be enough.
Unofficially, I say yea. The more I look into the issue, the more convinced I am that the project leaders have planned and are moving forward on this project in a good faith attempt to build something that will provide valuable services to the neighborhood and provide an example of moderate, anti-violence Islam.
The Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America accused New York officials on Tuesday of turning their backs on the reconstruction of the only church destroyed in the Sept. 11 attacks, while the controversial mosque near Ground Zero moves forward.
The tiny St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church is once again at the forefront of the myriad disputes that plague the rebuilding effort at ground zero. The fate of the church, a narrow whitewashed building that was crushed in the attack on the World Trade Center, was supposed to have been settled eight months ago, with a tentative agreement in which the church would swap its land for a grander church building on a larger parcel nearby, with a $20 million subsidy from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. This would have allowed work to begin at the south end of the site.