It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
which would explain why you don't know how to plot your own V-G diagram when the V-Speeds are known.
and yet the list of real pilots with real names and experience that surpasses google/sim pilots like yourself keeps growing.
Originally posted by Jimb07
I'm not so sure that's a good analogy, but I would say that proof on the balance of probabilities or preponderance of evidence (according to your jurisdiction) better reflects my view.
I don't "blindly support" the OS, but in this case I've not been persuaded of any alternative explanation yet.
This means that the proposition being presented by the government must be proven to the extent that there is no "reasonable doubt" in the mind of a reasonable person that the defendant is guilty
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
...youd think they would do some research and listen to those who have an understanding of flight dynamics and actually have flight time under their belt.........
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
reply to post by GayPilot
oh im sure he could if he had a mind to....besides how do we know YOURE a real pilot? just saying its all speculation, just because you have Pilot in your name doesnt mean you are one.
Originally posted by weemadmental
Weed got one better with the video, check out the 1 minute mark,
Originally posted by weemadmental
...weed is highly knowledgeable in these matters...
...and he doesn't want to risk a career by identifying himself to the great unwashed,
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
Once again, you keep saying this and posting that he doesnt knwo what hes talking about, when it seems that hes made quite the strong case......
Originally posted by GayPilot
Originally posted by weemadmental
Weed got one better with the video, check out the 1 minute mark,
Now show us one which exceeded Vmo by 150 knots.
Did you notice the 1 min + 3 second mark?
Well inside the green arc.
Try again.edit on 15-11-2010 by GayPilot because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by weemadmental
Come on gay pilot your showing your flight sim credentials here, the one minute mark is a low flying kc135 (its the BIG aeroplane not the extra 300) it is based on the 367-80 airframe that went into the Boeing 707, which is in this aircraft is a flying gas station, it can carry both cargo and fuel, enough for a good few sorties, it is/was to be replaced with a kc-767 but i believe that this has gone tender again, this airframe was introduced i believe June/July 57, if an old airframe such as this can complete these moves, do you not think a younger, more powerful and manoverable airframe could complete the moves completed on 9/11
In other words, since you admit you feel the evidence shows the Government Story (I prefer GS over OS) as "improbable", you have admitted to the fact that those who support the GS have not proven their case "Beyond A Reasonable Doubt".
Those who continue to argue in this thread that "if an alternate explanation is not offered, then the OS must be true", are wrong.
Everyone (including yourself) admit they have not been able to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, and instead find their case "improbable" based on the evidence provided.
Further, those who have presented evidence relevant to the topic, have been banned, without warning. And those who blindly support the GS, with rebuttals that consist of mostly ad homs and personal attacks, unsourced external content, and absurd claim which are also unsourced, remain.