It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by trebor451
Its really very simple. "Tiffany", through "her" quote from "her" favorite web page:
Based on EA990, it is impossible for the alleged United 175 to have continued controlled flight at more than 85 knots over the speed which failed the structure of EA990.
(found here)
claims that the Egypt Air 990 incident is the standard, the benchmark, the only measure, and by using that most definitive adjective impossible, the absolute sole criterion by which all aircraft transiting the ether will suffer catastrophic in-flight damage from overspeed or overstress-related damage. No if's, and's or buts. No variables need apply. *Any* aircraft, if it exceeds what Egypt Air 990 experienced, will break. Fail. Crash. Come apart. Cease to exist as an aeronautical flying machine.
Boeing needs to release wind tunnel data for the Boeing 767. Despite the fact that the data can be fabricated, such a release of data may alert more pilots and engineers to the extremely excessive speeds reported near sea level for the Boeing 767 in which they can decide for themselves.
Originally posted by TiffanyInLA
Seems you missed this part trebor -
Boeing needs to release wind tunnel data for the Boeing 767. Despite the fact that the data can be fabricated, such a release of data may alert more pilots and engineers to the extremely excessive speeds reported near sea level for the Boeing 767 in which they can decide for themselves.
Source -
pilotsfor911truth.org...
Again -
Evidence for my argument -
Data - NTSB, Boeing, Limits set by the manufacturer based on flight/wind tunnel testing
Precedent - EA990, China Airlines 747SP, TWA 727, 737, Modified DC-8, all suffered in flight structural failure, crash and/or lost control and needed 10's of thousand of feet to recover, or was modified to exceed it's manufacturer's set limits.
Numerous verified experts - (Many posted in this thread - www.abovetopsecret.com...)
Boeing needs to release wind tunnel data for the Boeing 767. Despite the fact that the data can be fabricated, such a release of data may alert more pilots and engineers to the extremely excessive speeds reported near sea level for the Boeing 767 in which they can decide for themselves.
Originally posted by trebor451
You are making absolute statements, using the descriptive adjective impossible", without all the data necessary to make such a claim.
Originally posted by Xtrozero
I’m sure the suggested speeds were calculated by some experts and experts have been wrong, so what if the government said that their first calculation were wrong and provided new speeds with the same results? I fail to see how this furthers the advancement of any other theory.
Originally posted by Alfie1
If AA 11 and UA 175 did not hit the Towers can anyone please enlighten me as to :-
(a) Where did those flights go ?
(b) What did hit the towers ?
(c) How, when and where was the switch made which was completely undetected by radar and ATC ?
Originally posted by Alfie1
If AA 11 and UA 175 did not hit the Towers can anyone please enlighten me as to :-
(a) Where did those flights go ?
(b) What did hit the towers ?
(c) How, when and where was the switch made which was completely undetected by radar and ATC ?
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by trebor451
The planes did hit the Towers and they were going whatever speed they were going without breaking up.
Originally posted by YouCanCallMeKM
I suggest you watch this video and make of it what you can. I recently came upon it in a ATS thread. It is really mind blowing if anything and changes your whole view on the event.
www.disclose.tv...
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by Reign02
Fair enough but what strikes you as particularly "fishy" about UA 175 and AA 11 hitting the towers, beyond a terrorist atrocity ?