It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by backinblack
He didn't mention "tracking" a target...
No, it only tracks a target based on what has been put into a flight plan.
It was "identifying" the "target" as a particular type of aircraft that he said radar couldn't do...
Originally posted by trebor451
Originally posted by backinblack
He didn't mention "tracking" a target...
I'm not certain what your native language is, but here is Balsamo's direct quote:
No, it only tracks a target based on what has been put into a flight plan.
I'll ask you again - what sort of radar needs information from a flight pan to TRACK a trarget?
It was "identifying" the "target" as a particular type of aircraft that he said radar couldn't do...
Go read, again, Balsamo's comment and tell me what sort of radar needs information from ANY sort of flight plan in order to track it.
This is the last I will talk about this particular item. Balsamo's comment about a radar needing "flight plan information" in order for it to b e"tracked" is about as stupid as the number of fake accounts he keeps signing in on here and if you choose to afford some legitimacy to his lunacy, feel free.
Originally posted by trebor451
Originally posted by backinblack
He didn't mention "tracking" a target...
I'm not certain what your native language is, but here is Balsamo's direct quote:
No, it only tracks a target based on what has been put into a flight plan.
I'll ask you again - what sort of radar needs information from a flight pan to TRACK a trarget?
It was "identifying" the "target" as a particular type of aircraft that he said radar couldn't do...
Go read, again, Balsamo's comment and tell me what sort of radar needs information from ANY sort of flight plan in order to track it.
This is the last I will talk about this particular item. Balsamo's comment about a radar needing "flight plan information" in order for it to b e"tracked" is about as stupid as the number of fake accounts he keeps signing in on here and if you choose to afford some legitimacy to his lunacy, feel free.
Originally posted by TiffanyinLA]
Does radar positive identify an aircraft as a standard 767?
No, it only tracks a target based on what has been put into a flight plan.
During that pass the Boeing is travelling at 350kts. I hope this settles your debate.
Regards
Anna
Anna Sussmilch l Senior Communications Adviser, Air Force Q
Defence Communications Group
DDI: 04 496 0286 l Mobile: 021 676 338 l DTeIN: (349) 7286
NZDF website: Click here l DCG intranet site: Click here
....not to mention how many times you and your socks here keep lying and calling the MARK on the graph is "made up" by RB.
Part 25 aircraft are also required to have design enhancements that allow continued safe flight after certain structural failures that would make a Part 23 aircraft unairworthy. G-loading tolerances are just one of the differences between the two aircraft design standards.
Add in the rest of the anti-RB sock parade's refusal to respond to simple questions, inability to to countenance the implications of their argument and outright lies.
.... lack of an intelligent counter-argument.
... all neutral readers can see and understand why.
Not ONCE have you properly responded to his challenges or refuted the evidence thats been presented with anything other than your opinion and claims its wrong.
So PLEASE EXPLAIN THE VIDEO THAT SHOWS A STEEP POWER DIVE THEN.
You can't have it both ways,,, ALL VIDEO RECORDS MUST show a consistent flight path and trajectory.
FACT is they don't just like the rest of the OS lie you blindly support... you know it, i know it, and the world thats analyzed all the fake footage knows it.
Oh, wait...no, actually...because there is NOTHING Inconsistent!! (except in the fevered imaginations of a few "TM" sites, still......and they are reviled by the OTHER "TM" people. Love, love the infighting!!! Makes for a good show!!)
.....one thing that is a proven FACT is that people who NOW believe the Government version of events on 9.11 are well and trully in the minority..