It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FrankBarone
Originally posted by weedwhacker
So, being such an "expert" on flying, you dare to criticize what I, and other large jet airplane pilots have to say? Some cheek.....
"Weedwhacker", why would any reader here take you seriously when real pilots put their names, faces and credentials on the line for all to see?
That is an excellent question, roboe. Maybe the next time Capt. Bob signs up with one of his sock puppets he will answer that question.
Hey Rob
How come you didn't bother to use a 757 simulator for that trial?
Also, Capt. Bob, is that simulator really in someone's garage or am I hallucinating?
Originally posted by weedwhacker
"Rusty" Aimer has a business now, that he operates in retirement. It's an "aviation consulting" gig! Funny, to me...a guy who makes such claims, who should know better. Seems it would be detrimental to his reputation, and affect his business? Go figure.
Originally posted by FrankBarone
I would put my name on my claims here, but ATS mods keep banning my account or others you rat on who you claim are "Rob Balsamo". Perhaps it has something to do with your donations to ATS?
namely, his claim that a radar can only track a target based on what has been put into a flight plan.
My aching side and body! See you on your next sock - for a post or two.
BTW, might be interesting to check out the CV of that guy, "Daniel"...the so-called "investigator"...where did HE come from??
Originally posted by backinblack
But didn't they LOSE contact with some of these planes for quite a while?
I heard 28 minutes mentioned about one..
If true, it says a lot about the quality of the US radar system..
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by trebor451
namely, his claim that a radar can only track a target based on what has been put into a flight plan.
My aching side and body! See you on your next sock - for a post or two.
But didn't they LOSE contact with some of these planes for quite a while?
I heard 28 minutes mentioned about one..
If true, it says a lot about the quality of the US radar system..
Yes and your comment has absolutely nothing to do with Balsamo's idiotic and completely false claim that "a radar can only track a target based on what has been put into a flight plan."
Originally posted by backinblack
You'd have to show me where anyone stated "a radar can only track a target based on what has been put into a flight plan."
That would obviously be a stupid statement as I don't think enemy aircraft, that I KNOW we can track on radar, would first lodge a flight plan.
Originally posted by TiffanyinLA]
Does radar positive identify an aircraft as a standard 767?
No, it only tracks a target based on what has been put into a flight plan.
Originally posted by trebor451
Originally posted by backinblack
You'd have to show me where anyone stated "a radar can only track a target based on what has been put into a flight plan."
That would obviously be a stupid statement as I don't think enemy aircraft, that I KNOW we can track on radar, would first lodge a flight plan.
You got it! Posted by Balsamo's "TiffanyinLA" persona in this post:
Originally posted by TiffanyinLA]
Does radar positive identify an aircraft as a standard 767?
No, it only tracks a target based on what has been put into a flight plan.
As far as your claim "That would obviously be a stupid statement..." is bang on with regards to Balsamo and his frequent visits here with his Sock du Jour.edit on 20-1-2011 by trebor451 because: formatting
I must confess.....ON this topic, with so much that has transpired, in the thread....
Originally posted by backinblack
Are you kidding me?????
You CAN read I hope...
That statement does NOT say the plane couldn't be tracked on radar..
It merely states the radar could NOT identify the plane as a 767..
Freakin heck, way to twist a sentence mate..edit on 21-1-2011 by backinblack because: (no reason given)
Freakin' heck, mate! Why don't YOU tell us what sort of radar system needs a "flight plan input" to "track a target"?