Originally posted by hooper
Wow, what was that 1962, 60? Did they do it? Did it involve killing tens of thousands of innocent Americans?
Doesn't matter. It's the
idea of even concocting such an illegal and devious plan such as "Operation Northwoods".
9/11 was Operation Northwoods, upgraded.
Originally posted by hooper
And exactly what is it that they have been dismantling these last 20 years in the former Soviet Union? Water balloons?
Nobody is denying that they had weapons of mass destruction. But they weren't "amassing" them. They weren't developing invisible, undetectable
weapons of mass destruction.
Real research would have taken you to, at minimum,
this short video about how Rumsfeld, Cheney,
et al, lied about the Soviet Union.
The documentary in
my thread here elaborates much further on how the exploits of the
criminals Rumsfeld, Cheney, et al.
Originally posted by hooper
Apples and oranges. Iraq did have and had used, weapons of mass destruction. That is a fact confirmed by thousands of dead bodies.
Can you please post links to some sources that confirm that Iraq was amassing weapons of mass destruction and where our military found those weapons?
That's the whole reason we went to war and when we got there, there were no weapons of mass destruction.
Your problem is you used
past tense. Yes, Iraq
had them at one point and we probably sold or gave them to Iraq. But the whole reason for
war
after 9/11 was that Iraq was amassing WMD's in the here and now and they would soon have nuclear capabilities. All false propaganda BS to
get us there.
Originally posted by hooper
No, there is one half-assed "paper" that a couple of guys paid to have printed wherein they supposedly tested some dust that people scraped off
their windowsills.
Half-assed? Do you have a link to a paper debunking the thermitic paper? Do you have a link to a paper that shows that the chips are only paint? No?
Then there's really nothing more to add to this other than your
opinion which is about as credible as cheese.
Originally posted by hooper
No, there are seismic recordings of one of the world's largest buildings falling to the ground.
Ooh, you must've missed
my thread where a new study by a very qualified PhD. proves
explosives were used at the WTC. But you'll attack it any way you can because it does not agree with your pre-programmed and denial-driven
beliefs.
Originally posted by hooper
In dust samples scraped from random windowsills.
Dust isn't scraped. And it doesn't matter where the dust was obtained. WTC dust is still WTC dust.
You're really reaching as far as you can to remain in denial. It's sad, really.
Anytime anyone want's to challenge me to a debate about the controlled demolition of the WTC, either in the debate forum or on the ATS Live Radio
Show, I'm ready and willing. Just get ahold of Nefermore or Semperfortis and I'll learn ya.
It's all so
complicated. 
