It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"The Internet has never been a regulated utility and we urge you to keep it that way by rejecting so-called "Net Neutrality" regulations on the Internet and the proposed Title II reclassification."
Originally posted by mnemeth1
If an ISP begins charing different rates for different amounts of usage, the public can decide on its own if they want to continue doing business with that ISP. We don't need criminal government regulators in there hosing up the free market.
Originally posted by havenvideo
A lot of people in this thread are misunderstanding the term "net neutrality", including the OP.
Net neutrality is what we want, what we have now. It is a good thing.
The OP is ass backwards. The tea party is saying they're all in favor of net neutrality, and they are against the corporate takeover.
It's pretty well known that Huff is the liberals equivalent of Faux News, and what they are doing here is deliberately mixing up terms for people who don't know any better in order to once again try to demonize the tea party.
This whole thread is a sham
Originally posted by 2weird2live2rare2die
i just got one question, how are google and verizon able to make decisions about the internet as a whole?
Originally posted by zzombie
Did anyone read the letter written to the FCC before parroting the media spin ?
Originally posted by rogerstigers
So under the desired (by corporatists) plan, sites like You Tube and Facebook would only be available at full speed if the user was paying for an unrestricted connection. Cheaper connections would either reduce the bandwidth or restrict access altogether.
Network neutrality
Further information: Network neutrality
As early as late 2006, Comcast has implemented measures using Sandvine hardware which sends forged TCP RST (reset) packets, disrupting multiple protocols used by peer-to-peer file sharing networks.[84] This has prevented most Comcast users from uploading files.[85]
On August 17, 2007, TorrentFreak reported that Comcast has been preventing BitTorrent users from seeding files.[85] In October 2007, the Associated Press confirmed the story that indicates that Comcast "actively interferes with attempts by some of its high-speed Internet subscribers to share files online, a move that runs counter to the tradition of treating all types of Net traffic equally."[86] In November 2007, Comcast's severe limiting of torrent applications was again confirmed by a study conducted by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, in which public domain literature is distributed over peer-to-peer networks. Analysis of the EFF study finds "strong evidence that Comcast is using packet-forging to disrupt peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing on their network".[87] The studies show that Comcast effectively prevents distribution of files over peer-to-peer networks by sending a RST packet under the guise of the end user, and denying the connection, which effectively blocks the user from seeding over BitTorrent. Legal controversy arises because instead of simple filtering, Comcast is sending RST packets to Comcast customers, pretending to be the host user at the other end of the BitTorrent connection.[88] Comcast's BitTorrent throttling was revealed to be through a partnership with Sandvine, although Comcast's internal memos instruct employees to respond to the contrary.[89][90]
There is also evidence of Comcast using RST packets on groupware applications that have nothing to do with file sharing. Kevin Kanarski, who works as a Lotus Notes messaging engineer, noticed some strange behavior with Lotus Notes dropping emails when hooked up to a Comcast connection and has managed to verify that Comcast's reset packets are the culprit.[91] A lawsuit, Hart v. Comcast, has been filed accusing Comcast of false advertising and other unfair trade practices for allegedly advertising unlimited high-speed Internet access while in reality working to restrict their customers' usage of the Internet.[92]
In 2007, Comcast customers reported a sporadic inability to use Google, because forged RST packets are interfering with HTTP access to google.com,[93] which has further angered users.[94]
Originally posted by Jenna
Originally posted by zzombie
Did anyone read the letter written to the FCC before parroting the media spin ?
You expect too much from people. Who wants to read what was actually stated when they can take the media's word for it instead.
Originally posted by jdub297
Second, true net neutrality already exists: You can use any ISP to go to any site regardless of how much bandwidth one takes over the other, or what content they offer.
What Google, Verizon and the Left-Liberal Democrats want is to LIMIT your ACCESS; regardless of the costs of your ISP services.
Originally posted by jdub297
The debate pits providers like Verizon against companies and individuals who use their networks to deliver products and services to customers. The providers are interested in the amount of money they spend on building and maintaining network infrastructure by charging those companies who use inordinate bandwidth for privileged access and delivery to customers.
Originally posted by jdub297
Google and Verizon's ensure that wireline internet services (like cable, phone lines and DSL) not be used for any such paid access, just as it is today.
Originally posted by jdub297
The real hidden danger is the regulation of (government) "Net Neutrality" in which NONE of these protections apply to wireless networks. Nor do they apply to something called "additional, differentiated online services, in addition to the Internet access and video services (such as Verizon's FIOS TV)" using current wireline networks.
It is the wireless exemption that most worries free-internet proponents, including the Tea Party movement..
FreedomWorks is also on the record supporting the telecommunications industry's position on network neutrality.[16] Broadband Internet companies like Verizon and AT&T would like to create "tiers" or "lanes" on the information superhighway:
FreedomWorks has accepted corporate contributions from telephone giants Verizon and SBC (now AT&T).[14]
"When, seventeen years ago, I designed the Web, I did not have to ask anyone's permission. The new application rolled out over the existing Internet without modifying it. I tried then, and many people still work very hard still, to make the Web technology, in turn, a universal, neutral, platform. It must not discriminate against particular hardware, software, underlying network, language, culture, disability, or against particular types of data.
Anyone can build a new application on the Web, without asking me, or Vint Cerf, or their ISP, or their cable company, or their operating system provider, or their government, or their hardware vendor.
It is of the utmost importance that, if I connect to the Internet, and you connect to the Internet, that we can then run any Internet application we want, without discrimination as to who we are or what we are doing."
Originally posted by jdub297
reply to post by maybereal11
What you've missed entirely is that the FCC should NOT be filing suits this. That is NOT within their Congressionally-established authority.
Your wiki "source" clearly explains that service providers and consumers have taken Comcast to court for this.
Other providers are providing competition. The MARKET will force Comcast and others to compete fairly or be replaced.
More proof that the now freedom hating, racist azzhats known as The Tea Bagger Group hates everything about everything that they cannot control.
And if there is anyone who would vote for these racists needs to have their heads examined.
Seriously, when do we finally tell MSM that their coverage of this racist and evil group is adding to the problem of division in our nation?
Kick these morons to the curb as no freedom loving, honest, decent American will support them
those who do if they cost you your freedoms you forfiet any rights you have to complain because it was you who voted them in.
Originally posted by zzombie
Did anyone read the letter written to the FCC before parroting the media spin ?
www.atr.org...
Originally posted by jdub297
reply to post by TheImmaculateD1
More proof that the now freedom hating, racist azzhats known as The Tea Bagger Group hates everything about everything that they cannot control.
This thread and especially this post are more proof that empty-minded liberal ideologies have no substance to contribute. Their best resources consist of false and incendiary statements, intend to incite fear and even hatred. Can't address the facts (or deathly fear them)? Disparage instead.
-- Since when all of a sudden did liberalism be equated with hate and be labled everything that is the matter with this nation. Buddy, let us never forget whose watch the nation went to crap on. That's right. 43!
And if there is anyone who would vote for these racists needs to have their heads examined.
In truth, the vast majority of the Tea Party Movement are NOT asking for anyone's vote. They are supporting principles of less government, less intrusion on personal matters, and FEWER restrictions on freddom.
--Big govt makes sure say, the lotion you put on your skin will do what it says it will do. Makes sure the food you put on your kid's plate is healthy and be beneficial to them. Big Govt makes sure your kids are to get an adequate education. Big Govt makes sure that things like The Financial Industry, Energy isn't allowed to dictate the policy. Big Govt is there to make sure the car you drive in is safe and free from faulty manufactuering. The clothes you wear everyday are hypoallergenic. If there was no aura of Big Govt we'd all be screwed big time and have no safe avenues. If you want to live in a nation without regulation get out of The USA as we are nation that takes care of one another and makes sure we are all safe.
Seems this scares the crap out of the real racist asses that rely upon a more-dependent America to sustain them.
Seriously, when do we finally tell MSM that their coverage of this racist and evil group is adding to the problem of division in our nation?
As if the MSM would ever dream of supporting any free-thinking person, much less such an ideology. Of course, when the popularity of TPM ideas becomes ever more undeniable, and ever more attractive to the majority of America, the MSM and their liberal supplicants fail to understand why ever-fewer Americans care to listen to them anymore.
--To be Tea Bagger loving conservative is nothing more then today's Nazi party. Hitler would've been against Network Neutrality to whle free thinking, free people are the ones for it.
Kick these morons to the curb as no freedom loving, honest, decent American will support them
That's right! If you can't deny the facts anymore, use whatever tactics you can get away with, including violence, to dissuade support. That's always been an excellent sign of desperation and "last resort" tactics.
--Last resort? I know way more about how things truly are and the entire TBM is nothing more then a distraction meant to keep us from coming together and fighting TPTB. The writing's been on the wall since 09.
Fortunately, most of the TPM are committed to working within the rules to instead of engaging in a like-kind defense.
Some say that is misguided, and that the rule-breakers will gain the uppoer hand unless they face violence in response to violence. Sadly, it may come to that, as there are too many committed to the TPM to let it be defeated unfairly. Thus, the increasing calls for "revolution."
--The blind leading the blind. Sarah Palin and Co do not represent you and represent everyyhing that is the matter with this nation. Get that straight. Racism, against net neutrality, my, my, the only differnence between TPM and Nazi's is the date and location. Book burnings in the 1930's was the then version of todays dissolution of network neutrality. When does Krystall Nacht begin? When does the Final Solution go into effect?
those who do if they cost you your freedoms you forfiet any rights you have to complain because it was you who voted them in.
Actually, those who are already 'voted in' are the ones costing freedoms and "forfeiting" rights that the TPM are willing to defend.
-- To defend a group against network neutrality means you are what continues to remain what is fundamentally the matter with this nation. Tea Bagger plant, Hook, line, sinker, SUNK!
I'm extremely interested to see how far the TPM will go to regain what's been stolen from the America they love and grew up in. I'd be willing to bet they'll "go all the way."
deny ignorance
-- Do not defend idiots who wish to restrict what you can and cannot say on the WWW. Regain what? They never had anything and never will have anything to begin with, the group as a whole is too unstable mentally, psychologically and socially to be entrusted with the reins of political power. That would be like letting the inmates run the asylum. Ain't never going to happen. Got it? You don't let the animals run the zoo.
We hve never been a nation where one side dominates above the rest and I really feel that with this Rise Of The New Racist Extreme Right means it is just a matter of time before someone decides to take a shot at an elected official then everything we've fought and bleed for is over. I will say this right here, right now - Any person or group tries to cost any American thier freedom or rights is an enemy of mine and will be met with hostile force. Instead of being quick to defend these azzhats it is best that the entire nation distances itself from this group of mentally unstable idiots whose average IQ is less then 105.
jw
[edit on 15-8-2010 by jdub297]