posted on Aug, 12 2010 @ 04:30 PM
COULD NOT HAVE BEEN MADE OVERNIGHT BY MAN!!
Why not? Do you say this with such certainty because when you imagine some number of people making this, in your imagination it takes longer than one
night? That's how you know people couldn't it?
Ask yourself this: Which explanation requires you to postulate more theoretical entities, based on no evidence?
The human explanation requires that you postulate a sophisticated and effective method for making elaborate crop circles. You just assume that it
exists in order to explain the observation of crop circles.
The ET explanation requires that you postulate that there is a planet with life on it near enough to earth to travel here. That on that planet,
complex life has evolved. That those life forms have developed science and technology, and have their own space program. That the ET space program
produced a ship that travelled to earth. Finally, that the ET ship that arrived here has a sophisticated and effectve method for making elaborate
crop circles. You need all of those things to be true in order for the ET explanation to work.
Why, when both of these explanations could explain the observed phenomenon(the crop circle), would you choose the explanation that depends on such a
long list of hypotheticals?
See Occam's Razor