It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wcitizen
reply to post by NOTurTypical
What if the Bible was corrupted and changed to create a story which the evil Cabal created hundreds of years
Originally posted by OldThinker
Originally posted by GeorgeH
I can't believe that a "johnny one note" could command 39 pages.
Pretty cool huh?
To quote Colonel William Tavington: "Quite impressive for a farmer with a pitchfork, wouldn't you say? "
Originally posted by OldThinker
Originally posted by Syrus Magistus
Screw the bible. .....I think DNA is a wavelength that comes from the center of our galaxy in waves. There's some evidence to support that theory,
and I think it's a lot better than "everything's random, screw you" or "A bearded deity did it, give me your money and don't have sex".
I didn't know the Bible said "everythings random?"
The OP says the opposite.....
btw, God deosn't need your money and he created SEX, my frustrated poster
Originally posted by OldThinker
There once was ONE planet…
Only ONE….
That contained intelligent life…
This planet is even the focal point of all stars…
If fact, this planet was visited by the creator.
The END!
= = = = = =
This little story of origin is the only mathematically possible solution…
You see, 94% of ALL data and the outcome of variability has at its root a statistical thing called…you ready?
Called COMMON CAUSE.
Excerpt:
Every system has variation; some of this is due to the system itself, known as common cause variation; some of it is due to singular incidents or special situations; this is special cause variation. In his book, Out of the Crisis (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1982), W. Edwards Deming estimated that 94 percent of problems (or possibilities for improvement) lie with the system as common-cause variation; 6 percent are special causes.
Originally posted by Syrus Magistus
Atheism is the other end, which champions the notion of random evolution. They are the sort of people who say 'everything's random' and that to me is as big a fallacy as claiming some bloodthirsty tribal deity is the creator of the universe. That, to me, is an example of human evolution.
Originally posted by imnotbncre8ive
I am skeptical that you know anything at all about statistics. Or mathematics in general. Or science in general. William Dembski doesn't impress me despite his pseudo-mathematiccs. Your ability to cut-paste some random text does not impress me either.
Originally posted by imnotbncre8ive
Originally posted by Syrus Magistus
Atheism is the other end, which champions the notion of random evolution. They are the sort of people who say 'everything's random' and that to me is as big a fallacy as claiming some bloodthirsty tribal deity is the creator of the universe. That, to me, is an example of human evolution.
My Gawd.. how many times do people have to tell you that evolution is NOT RANDOM. Do your homework - you might actually learn something by reading Dawkins's books (and I'm not talking about God Delusion - that book wasn't that great).
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
Originally posted by imnotbncre8ive
Originally posted by Syrus Magistus
Atheism is the other end, which champions the notion of random evolution. They are the sort of people who say 'everything's random' and that to me is as big a fallacy as claiming some bloodthirsty tribal deity is the creator of the universe. That, to me, is an example of human evolution.
My Gawd.. how many times do people have to tell you that evolution is NOT RANDOM. Do your homework - you might actually learn something by reading Dawkins's books (and I'm not talking about God Delusion - that book wasn't that great).
If you consider that the variable that instigate evolution are random, then... it kinda is.
2nd
Originally posted by sirnex
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
Originally posted by imnotbncre8ive
Originally posted by Syrus Magistus
Atheism is the other end, which champions the notion of random evolution. They are the sort of people who say 'everything's random' and that to me is as big a fallacy as claiming some bloodthirsty tribal deity is the creator of the universe. That, to me, is an example of human evolution.
My Gawd.. how many times do people have to tell you that evolution is NOT RANDOM. Do your homework - you might actually learn something by reading Dawkins's books (and I'm not talking about God Delusion - that book wasn't that great).
If you consider that the variable that instigate evolution are random, then... it kinda is.
2nd
Actually, it kinda isn't...
Whatever chemical reactions that took place prior to abiogenesis were not random occurrences, they followed a set rule that any chemist/biochemist would be happy to teach you about... There is no such thing as random, it's never been observed nor can it be produced.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow
And external conditions aren't random either....so your point is?
Originally posted by catchmeifyoucan
i cant believe this thread is still alive.. what nonesense.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
Originally posted by imnotbncre8ive
Originally posted by Syrus Magistus
Atheism is the other end, which champions the notion of random evolution. They are the sort of people who say 'everything's random' and that to me is as big a fallacy as claiming some bloodthirsty tribal deity is the creator of the universe. That, to me, is an example of human evolution.
My Gawd.. how many times do people have to tell you that evolution is NOT RANDOM. Do your homework - you might actually learn something by reading Dawkins's books (and I'm not talking about God Delusion - that book wasn't that great).
If you consider that the variable that instigate evolution are random, then... it kinda is.
2nd
Originally posted by sirnex
Actually, it kinda isn't...
Whatever chemical reactions that took place prior to abiogenesis were not random occurrences, they followed a set rule that any chemist/biochemist would be happy to teach you about... There is no such thing as random, it's never been observed nor can it be produced.
Originally posted by imnotbncre8ive
The individual mutations are random - the average direction of evolution is not.
Originally posted by OldThinker
Originally posted by imnotbncre8ive
The individual mutations are random - the average direction of evolution is not.
pls help OT out friend, ok?
the "average direction" of evolution is not random...so its "assignable" "special?"
Originally posted by imnotbncre8ive
Originally posted by OldThinker
Originally posted by imnotbncre8ive
The individual mutations are random - the average direction of evolution is not.
pls help OT out friend, ok?
the "average direction" of evolution is not random...so its "assignable" "special?"
The individual mutations occur at random. Individuals of a population will vary in their survival and reproductive fitness. Survival and reproduction of the fittest will, over time, produce a nonrandom change in the average qualities of the population.
I don't understand what you're asking. Are you asking me to elaborate and/or provide an example? Who is OT? OT = OldThinker?