It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I've shown you their flaws, but you continue to ignore it because criticizing those arguments goes against your world view....no matter how illogical the arguments are.
Life always comes from preexisting life. Always.
So your statement...
Life always comes from preexisting life. Always.
...is blatantly wrong and just shows that you're arguing in a field you're not really familiar in.
The problem I see on ATS is evolution does not explain how life started, yet evolution is used to "prove" there is no God
The debate is Abiogenesis vs Creation. Where did life come from?
They didn't interfere at all. The whole experiment was set up to REPLICATE the NATURAL CONDITIONS. They didn't add anything that wasn't available in nature at that time. So no, no outside interference was necessary to create RNA.
On a Friday in March, scientists inserted over 1 million base pairs of synthetic DNA into Mycoplasma capricolum cells before leaving for the weekend. When they returned on Monday, their cells had bloomed into colonies. Read More www.wired.com...
If you pay attention you will only see scientists attack creationists because they turn and twist the weirdest stuff to find an excuse to debunk evolution.
It is save to say that there is so much evidence that backs up the theory, you will not live long enough to study it all.
The whole experiment just shows that we're on the right track to solving the mystery
Given that, we can already conclude with 100% certainty that the whole Genesis account of Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden is blatantly wrong
Interesting thread.
It seems that life on this planet is symbiotic and requires other life or elements to survive. It appears to be a complex biosphere that works together.
That is one of the reasons I believe in Creation.
Again I emphasize that life comes from preexisting life. That can be tested and repeated. If I decide to breed two dogs or researchers "create" life in a lab it is essentially the same thing. Human interference using existing material.
People are people, often they are driven by the same things, they just take different sides of an argument.
I have seen an artists rendering of a fully formed primitive "caveman" a missing link, only to discover that the evidence for the creature was a portion of jawbone.
I once saw a T.V. program about 12 years ago (PBS I think, maybe NOVA).
The program was a debate among the scientific community on how life began. One scientist stated that, at that time, all the evidence for evolution could be fit into a box the size of a coffin.
If I believe that life is proof of Creation, can't I say the same thing? If I am right, I may have all of eternity to study this planet.
Well... creation does not have to mean it was done by God as it was written in the bible.
Life could very well be without an after life all together.
But... I hope the journey continues
Originally posted by dusty1
reply to post by MrXYZ
The whole experiment just shows that we're on the right track to solving the mystery
In my opinion the experiment shows that intelligence is needed to create life.
Given that, we can already conclude with 100% certainty that the whole Genesis account of Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden is blatantly wrong
I disagree.
Originally posted by headb
Hi OP!.
I wonder how this ties up with the Vatican / Fr. Funnes thing - the possibility of "intelligent" life out there. Just a thought, sir.CHeers!!!
Originally posted by MrXYZ
2) LOOOOL!! So basically, they are one...but then again not, somehow. Clue: You can't be one if you're split up in a larger and smaller part!!
JOH 10:30 I and my Father are one.
JOH 14:28 Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.
Originally posted by OldThinker
reply to post by iditenahuiats
2. No contradiction!
I think the 10 or so links at the top of google that spout this, must have a good marketer....yeah I can hear the meeting now, "yeah that is that it! Sure the FACT that things 'break down" over time is a great support for the THEORY that things get better over time. Sure we can sell that!"
I'd fired your marketer friend...BAD argument...
But I thank you for your politeness