NEW! Starchild Skull DNA Result.., page 3

reply to post by DCDAVECLARKE

---

DCDAVECLARKE.....

There is already a current thread about this:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

This is in addition to the several extensive threads about this topic, some of which are relatively recent.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

reply to post by DCDAVECLARKE

---

DCDAVECLARKE.....

This skull is a case of Progeria Sydnrome, as per my extensive commentary in both the Aliens & UFOs Forum & the Medical Forum.

Progeria Syndrome is extremely rare.

Here is a picture of a little fellow called Ashley, who has the condition:



Here is a video of Ashley:



If you review Progeria Syndrome in detail, you will find that all aspects of the "Starchild Skull" can be explained by Progeria Syndrome.

Amongst other points of discussion, I note the oft mentioned.....

- Lack of frontal sinuses

- Abnormal bone composition

- Large, shallow orbits

.....which are consistent with Progeria Syndrome.

Here is some more info about Progeria Syndrome.

www.progeriaresearch.org...

en.wikipedia.org...

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

[edit on 10-8-2010 by Maybe...maybe not]

reply to post by Maybe...maybe not

---

Furthermore, and to the contrary, I appreciate your input on the Progeria Syndrome, and although in theory, this skull is believed to be the skull of a mixed-DNA infant:

Progeria Syndrome, or an ancient version of it, could have been what affected the so called "Star Child". The only real way to test that would be to collect DNA from a Progeria Syndrome patient, but then again, we would already know that the X and Y's both came from humans.

In the Star Child case... either the X's or Y's are not making sense from a human-to-human interaction. Thus lies the mystery.

reply to post by Maybe...maybe not

---

Yes we already know that,but this thread is more constructive and interesting..Dont you think.
Sorry about the off topic post.

Us folks in middle England speak our minds that's why i dont post much..




[edit on 10/8/2010 by lewtra]

reply to post by Blue Shift

---

Because he said there is nothing else like this on the planet that they have found. They don’t even know what the red stuff is where the bone marrow should be. The bone is not polished and white it’s not acting like anything ever seen. That doesn’t freak you out?

reply to post by lewtra

---

Yea, that was interesting... but maybe it really was just dropped on a carpet... haha. No, im joking of course, that was curious.

For me i think there are a few key issues concerning the DNA (origin) of the skull.

1. Regardless of its origins, Earth or elsewhere, what are the implications of finding evidence for genetic manipulation of our species by an alien species... Possibly the dawn of a new age of conspiracy? An Epic Galaxy-wide conspiracy to manipulate all intelligent life forms through genetic engineering, so that the species behind all this would forever remain the most advanced in the galaxy??.. ...

this is fun .

2. Can geneticists possibly discern whether or not something is Alien at all? What i mean by this is, we know already the skull contains Human DNA: Fact. However, can it be logically assumed that the rest of the DNA, not previously recognised as human, is Not simply due to some extremely rare mutation?

3. What actually is that red stuff?

4. The fact that the analysis has shown this skull was from an adult means it survived without being killed by the Humans who clearly accepted it into their community.. if it hadn't already been born into it. Otherwise, without knowledge of the many essential resources needed to survive on this planet (food, water etc), and the knowledge of the many hazards that come with living here, this star child wouldn't have survived beyond infancy... unless of course the alien genetics was advanced enough for them to have been able to determine what humans consume in order to maintain good health and survive, but would that have been necessary anyway? would this star child still the the digestive system of its alien ancestors? or ours? Either way this simply doesn't add up. If it was born here, which has been proven to be a fact due to evidence of human DNA within the skull, then How is it possible for the alien species who came here to sustain themselves, let alone their cute little hybrid star child... oh wait sorry, they must've flown back home once a week right?.. to restock their supplies.... which could also explain how litte Star would have survived if its digestive system was not as human as the many many human like features of its skull. But even it the humans had cared for it, despite knowing its unearthly origins, surely being only 900 years ago, we would have records of this benevolent hospitality shown by the people who cared for this "star-child". But we have nothing. No written records, no rock paintings, no statues, no monuments, nothing at all.. So what happend, unless someone wants to tell me that humanity simply saw the arrival of an alien species from one of our own as something entirely unremarkable and the whole event was completely unrecorded. And please dont tell me becaause it was 900 years ago that these records may have dissapeared.. wouldnt you think that if an alien had lived on this planet, no matter what age in history, the story would have at least become part of some folk-tale, or legend?

I personally don't need to wait for the DNA results to be confident in my beleif that this is not of alien origin. logic can tell us how ridiculous this is, beyond our desire for it to be true.



Good luck dreamers... oh wait..
DizzyDayDream

reply to post by DizzyDayDream

---

I never said it was Alien.I just find it interesting and I'm sure you do.I gave you a star for your responce.Thanks

reply to post by OldDragger

---

It was an atomic element not found on Earth, yet residing in the junk DNA, that could not be identified as earthly, or found in any significant quantity on earth to account for or explain their inclusion in the strand.

Sorry but I can't offer any more info since the HGP site where I discovered this extraordinary inference has since been dismantled and reorganized.

Sterilized.

reply to post by Blue Shift

---

Who says they don't have DNA to compare it to? if you believe in extraterrestrial beings than maybe you believe in Roswell? and other incidents, where conspirators say there were aliens.

reply to post by Maybe...maybe not

---

Out of curioisty has any DNA alaysis been done on this type of anomoly and if so are the results the same as the starchild? While it very well could be what you have described, looks are sometimes deceiving.

In this case the DNA alanysis is showing something we have never seen before.



[edit on 10-8-2010 by Xcathdra]

reply to post by ziggyproductions05

---

I know a few on ATS that will discredit this. They despise alien knowledge and existence.

reply to post by DCDAVECLARKE

---

The DNA was tested before and found to be human. A human being, as far as we know, can only reproduce with another human being. To suggest that an intelligent organism that evolved in a separate bio-sphere could reproduce with a human woman is absurd. A truly alien organism might not even have DNA as we know it.

Egg found in Martian Meteorite
  Posted 19 days ago with 126 member flags

Bizzare Enochian encounter for writer while working with rock band Tool on Faaip De Oiad (Tool song
  Posted 4 days ago with 56 member flags

Ooparts and Ancient aliens
  Posted 2 days ago with 55 member flags

Bad Ufologists-Lets clean the closet of any skeletons
  Posted 10 days ago with 52 member flags

Death by UFO!
  Posted 16 days ago with 49 member flags

UFOs during Satellite launch
  Posted 10 days ago with 49 member flags

Tracey Taylor - "Aliens Gave Me a Special Gift"
  Posted 9 days ago with 31 member flags

DIVINE INTERVENTION: ETs Defeating Old World Order
  Posted 17 days ago with 29 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: