It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In every part of a progeria victim's head you have a human counterpart. They have normal human eye sockets, normal foramen magnum placement, normal neck attachments, normal chewing muscle attachments, most definitely an inion, they have sinuses (though often reduced like other parts of the face under the cranium), they have brow ridges and a dip from that ridge down to the beginning of their noses, a curved roof of their mouths, normal inner ears, etc.
The Starchild has NONE of those typically human features. In fact, there are NO typically human features left in the Starchild skull.
DNA from Starchild site
The sample taken from the Starchild Skull (SCS-1) has mtDNA consistent with Native American haplogroup C, as revealed through two independent extractions performed on fragments of parietal bone. While a single first extraction did not appear to type similarly, this inconsistent result is likely a product of a low level of contamination.
Attempts to recover DNA from the skull easily produced its mitochondrial DNA, which proved its mother was fully human. However, no nuclear DNA could be recovered using human-only primers, which strongly indicates that the skull's father was something other than a typical human.
The Ness: Starchild
DNA sample was taken from the skull, and was subjected to DNA probes designed to detect sequences of DNA that are unique to humans (performed by Dr. David Sweet, Director of the Bureau of Legal Dentistry at the University of British Columbia)5. The Starchild skull DNA was found to contain both an X and a Y chromosome. This is conclusive evidence that the child was not only human (and male), but both of his parents must have been human as well, for each must have contributed one of the human sex chromosomes.
Figures for the average brain size of modern humans tend to vary between sources, but a typical value is 1350 or 1400 cc (cubic centimetres). The following figures should convey a feel for the normal range of variation in human skulls. Burenhult (1993) states that the 90% of humans fit in the range 1040-1595 cc, and that the extreme range is 900-2000 cc.
Email from Pye: March 2010
Any request for funding alternative research never goes over well with mainstream sycophants, even though every mainstream scientist rabidly seeks out their next infusion of grant money. What an incredible double-standard those jerks live by! And for what it's worth, this is only the SECOND time I've asked for help from my mailing list in the past six years. I got $1200 a few weeks ago, the geneticist has burned through that, and now he needs more. So sue me.....
Email from Pye: March 2010
As for the arguments about the DNA test that said the Starchild carried an X and Y chromosome, that was carried out in late 1999 and has since been proved to be done by incompetents who arrived at a completely wrong answer.
Dr David Sweet
Forensic DNA from teeth, bones and saliva; Human bitemark forensic evidence; Use of dental characteristics in human identification
Originally posted by Kandinsky
The man described by Pye as 'incompetent' in the email seems very competent. I could be mistaken, I think that's the last name Pye released in connection to Starchild. It's easy to see why he stopped.
Originally posted by Banes
How many recorded UFO reports exist? 30.000? 40.000?
In order to prove that aliens do not exist, debunker needs to disprove ALL of them!
In order to PROVE alien existence, believer needs to prove only ONE!
Since science didn't "debunk" ALL of them, and proofs of alien crafts are everywhere,
why is it so unbelievable that Starchild skull could be real hybrid deal?
Do debunkers think that our science is perfect and we know everything there is to know about everything there is?
"crazies" who keep open mind about UFO's, aliens and all that nonsense?...