Nasa forgets to smudge out an anomaly on the Moon

page: 12
41
<< 9  10  11   >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 12 2010 @ 01:45 AM
link   
reply to post by i am just saying
 

Hello there. Welcome to ATS.
There is no shadow...keep reading.




posted on Jan, 4 2011 @ 10:42 PM
link   
My uncle Bob used to work for NASA he told me that there was another astronaut that landed on the moon during the Apollo 11 mission, he was called Kip Johnson. When the eagle took off for its ascent Buzz quickly realised that they had left Kip on the moons surface and they didn't have enough fuel to go back for him.

After their return NASA had to cover up the whole mess but nearly all the NASA photographs had Kip in them so in a scramble NASA set up a fake moon set and re-photographed around 80% of the original photographs obviously minus poor Kip, and Kips existence was completely covered up.


This was the only photo of Kip that can be found anywhere it was taken shortly after the eagles ascent and Kip can clearly be seen looking up as his fellow astronauts leave the moons surface.




R.I.P Kip 1936 - 1969
edit on 4-1-2011 by roughycannon because: spelling



posted on Jul, 11 2011 @ 11:55 PM
link   
tracking the progression of the object along the other images taken , they do have subtle differences if your using Google Earth , on an angular view elev -2655 m at the following location 24°54'2.49"N 16° 3'53.53"E with an eye altitude of -2055 you can see that it has been morphed in some way . Peaks and valleys can be seen which would show the image morphing .

The following location on GE 26°57'16.17"N 1°50'24.90"E at elev -1948 with an eye altitude of -920 that show a completely different shape to the numerous other times it is seen . Some if not all graphics programs will let a person pinch and twist the image and push it past the plane into a hollow which further morphs the image as to being smudged .

Around the Felix,Artemis and Verne craters again within Google Earth Program you can clearly see smudged/morphed images that have been taken to extremes so we cannot see then clearly , prime example of this is at 23°51'9.64"N 25°42'27.85"W

reversing the stretched images will clearly show what they do not want us to see .
edit on 12-7-2011 by watchdog8110 because: additional images morphed



posted on Jul, 12 2011 @ 12:02 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 12 2011 @ 09:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
What you have "found" is dirt...


That was all you really needed to say to shut up the scare-mongers.



posted on Jul, 15 2011 @ 12:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by JohnPhoenix
 

Lot of them robots don't you think. And it's kinda funny how they all appear in the same place in each frame. Makes 'em easy to find when you know where to look.


[edit on 8/10/2010 by Phage]


Correct that the object shows up in multiple locations , yet when they do not show up and later show again if you go on a grid Hmmm . The same camera ? Used at the same resolution yet has an object that comes and goes . To some that brings into other possibilities of wth is going on .

Connecting the dots from when the object is first seen until it doesn,t anymore , the gaps should be equally spaced at aprox 22 miles between each objects appearance . They are not . The object shows up approx 48 times but there are missing images of the object . That is if your using Google Earth / Moon .

There should be one over or near the Greaves crater but it is not there on GE/Moon . Also when the object is seen as following the contours of the terrain as in this one 24°24'59.25"N 18°38'8.81"E , then what can be said ? Other questions arise from a single object/particle of dirt .

Food for thought , if your interested . Track a line from the first image to the last and follow any other objects along that line to see if they also are seen 48 times as the original object / dirt particle . You may be surprised what you find . Since you have a frame of reference to go from .




posted on Jul, 15 2011 @ 06:07 PM
link   


The same camera ?


Could be, and maybe not. The cameras were disposed of, on the moon, to save liftoff weight. Film was stored in heavy metal boxes and developed on earth. Astronauts are not professional photographers. NASA crops images tilted or otherwise editing out areas over or underexposed, you don't always see the full frame photographed. With that said they do not alter images to 'hide things' or expose things, you simply see images that have cropped out defects in the film, exposure, or developing process from a private non-NASA firm.

They didn't go all that way with one single camera. LOL!
edit on 15-7-2011 by Illustronic because: Somehow, I had to fix the quote I was responding to.



posted on Aug, 3 2011 @ 07:34 PM
link   
Another Robot/Humanoid?

Found another Humanoid/Robot which no doubt NASA forgot to airbrush....27 22 42.53N 23 40 10.80W





new topics
top topics
 
41
<< 9  10  11   >>

log in

join