It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Question for experts on Aliens and the crash site at Roswell

page: 2
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 14 2010 @ 06:32 AM
link   
reply to post by chunder
 


ok, if you believe all that then you've got to ask yourself one big question.

if we got all this technology from the supposed crash as claimed and have found it reasonably easy to back engineer it and duplicate and improve all these things then why is it that we are still stuck in the dark ages of space flight ?

we still use rockets and shuttles that have been around forever and a day but surely we could have created something better a long time ago with the technology since it supposedly crashed in 1947!!!. we supposedly made breakthroughs with all the other stuff in just a couple of years if we are to believe phillip corso's chain of events and had all the other stuff sussed by about 1950 to 52 but yet nothing on space flight 63 years? sorry but im not buying it.

thanks

rich




posted on Aug, 16 2010 @ 01:04 AM
link   
reply to post by RICH-ENGLAND
 


Who said anything about back engineering, duplicating and improving ?

I'm not sure you are that familiar with Corso's claims. We are talking about small items, purpose and context generally unknown but exhibiting manufacturing properties not wholly unlike existing research streams.

If anything was duplicated it was simply as a manufacturing process and unlikely to have then operated as it would in the original context, it was then simply used to improve something that already existed.

The fact that space flight is still a chemical powered affair has no bearing whatsoever on Corso's claims. He never mentioned propulsion systems and bear in mind Corso was Army, there is some evidence that the bulk of the wreckage went to the Air Force and the Army were given the crumbs (which could be what Corso inherited).

There are dozens of reasons why even if something was recovered there would still be rockets, here are a few.

It isn't in the MIC's best interests for it to be otherwise.
The technology could not be understood or duplicated.
It was destroyed in any crash.
A suitable weapons system has yet to be built.
It is in use in the military - that's what all the UFO reports since have been and what Gary McKinnon hacked into.
It is able to be reproduced cheaply and built in your garage for a few hundred bucks - but someone decided we're not ready for the jetsons lifestyle yet.



posted on Aug, 16 2010 @ 11:19 AM
link   
reply to post by chunder
 


it would have to be back engineered to understand it!!!. and its not as simple as figuring out manufacturing processes? how could you possibly do that without seeing how it was manufactured!!!. if aliens exist they might manufacture things by telikenisis for all we know!!!. we would back engineer something and then try to duplicate it with our own methods of manufacture or create new ones!.

its just a fantasy, no more, no less.

anybody could just look up any scientific research and find out when something had a breakthrough and then claim it was "seeded" from some claimed e.t crash that happened before it, it doesn't make it true.

and yes im familiar with his claims, it was something i looked into a lot of years ago and as ive already said, i am extremely satisfied that its nonsense, if there was any truth to it then it probably would never have been published.

thanks

rich

[edit on 16-8-2010 by RICH-ENGLAND]



posted on Aug, 16 2010 @ 11:42 AM
link   
the only arguments we ever got into with the aliens were over us detonating thermonuclear devices.

it was disrupting their agenda and inadvertently killing them.

this is why we had a sit down with the aliens and cut a deal.




 
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join