It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Christians dont need to convert scientists to get into heaven the last time I checked. And scientists dont need to convert Christians to do what they do. If Christians would mind their own business, (tend to the beam in their own eyes) like their Jesus instructed, there would be no problem. If scientists would stop proclaiming that the ridiculousness of a 6000 year old Earth disproved the possibility of a Divine altogether, there would be no problem.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
reply to post by randyvs
Not if you dont consider mindless bickering, attempts to eradicate each others beliefs, and slaughtering each other for 2000 years a problem, no.
If all that is fine with you, then there is no problem.
Originally posted by randyvsMost of the time, I believe when science is being truthful. They say the earliest civilizations go back
to around six thousand years ago. Ten thousand tops.That number seems to get larger if the conversation leans towards creation. Coincidentally the Bible does seem to add up the same number for mans creation. Six thousand years ago. Funny the Bible even goes further in the use of the number Six in relation to man. In revelation, it is the number of a man. the average height of man is six feet.God created man on the sixth day.The depth of which a man is buried is six feet. Five is the angelic number. Six being the human number closer to Gods number 7. There in lies the problem. At any rate, thank God for evolution.
Then there is the bombadier beetle.
The Soviet Union was the first state to have as an ideological objective the elimination of religion[1] and its replacement with atheism as a fundamental ideological goal of the state[2][3]. Toward that end, the communist regime confiscated church property, ridiculed religion, harassed believers, and propagated atheism in the schools.[4]
Ifyou would take the blinders of "religion" off, perhaps you would have a better view:
Both videos are great. The are professional in every way and seem careful not insult people for what they believe. The one thing you must understand is you can start each video off with the words .
This is how God did it. Still you would come away making the same amount of sense of everything that was said.
How in your mind does science get the dates 6000-10,000 years old right, But you scream they are invalid when any date gets anywhere past 10,000 ?
Originally posted by randyvs
In revelation, it is the number of a man. the average height of man is six feet.God created man on the sixth day.The depth of which a man is buried is six feet. Five is the angelic number. Six being the human number closer to Gods number 7. There in lies the problem. At any rate, thank God for evolution.
Then there is the bombadier beetle.
[edit on 8-8-2010 by randyvs]
As for burying people six feet under, that's just an expression. There is actually no set depth for burials. Some places have a minimum depth of 1.5 feet, while others are as high as 12 feet. In a place like New Orleans it is completely impossible to bury someone six feet under because the land is so low, the grave would flood with water. Even at 2 feet the risk is not completely gone. Furthermore, the practice of burying people six feet under only goes back as far as London's Great Plague of 1665, when an edict was made stating that people had to be buried at least six feet under in order to help stop the spread of plague.
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by nophun
No I don't think I would scream at dates of fifty thousand even a hundred thousand after that, I think you're get'in iffy. Amounts of time that suggest eons are simply hard to swallow from a laymans point of view.
Even in science the leyman is sometimes proven correct after all. That is to say common sense thinking.
There is far less chance, of everything happening by chance, then the chance there is a Supreme being as part of the equation.
Would evolution be so mindful as to put finger nails at the ends of our fingers?
Would evolution be harder to believe if we didn't laugh?
It seems science wants to be granted an infinite amount of time just to let evolution get started.
They say the earliest civilizations go back to around six thousand years ago
Randy, I would think that you should know by now that the idea of primordial soup being struck by lightning is a strawman. Its a misconception set out by Creationists and then knocked down as laughably absurd.
Evolution is not mindful of anything, it is not a consciously directed process. Nature also carves beautiful waterfalls, massive ice bergs, and awesome canyons and yet it wouldn't take much at all to say those are all naturally formed and didn't require a God. We understand the mechanism of evolution just as we understand the erosion that created the canyon.
The Bombardier Beetle is meant to say what exactly? What of the various types of parasitic wasps that lay their eggs in caterpillars and other insects, the eggs hatch and the insect is eaten alive from the inside out... Surely if a good God had a hand in evolution no such system would have ever developed
Maybe we should be glad that dosn't happen on our level.
Let's say for a moment that God really is real and he created the Universe, I doubt he wants to waste all sorts of time carving each individual canyon. Much quicker to set up geology to do it for him naturally. The same goes of evolution, if there is a God he could well have set up this world to take its own evolutionary course without his direct intervention.
(I hope I did not really need to explain that )