It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by maybereal11
You do realize that the vast majority of homosexuals were born to your typical mother and father that demonstrated a loving relationship...at the very least as much as parents of heterosexual children?
Originally posted by maybereal11
The idea that homosexuals are the result of some failure of education or demonstratitve love by the parents...well I can't get around it...that is the stupidest thing that has been said on this thread so far...and that is saying a lot!.
Originally posted by maybereal11
You can't "Teach" straight or gay.
Originally posted by maybereal11
If you are incapable of that, then please don't have kids lest you raise one more broken psuedo-sociopath for the world.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by centurion1211
Hey "real".
Investigate the term "original source" of the virus. You know, the so-called "patient 0" for each case.
Original source? Well - that truly shows your prejudice right there.
What does the original source have to do with the spread of this disease?
That is the most pathetic thing I think I have ever read on ATS.
It take back the apology I made to you. You do not deserve it.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by Nofoolishness
So you have finally come out of the closet annee? I always knew there was a reason you were so pro LGBT....because your one of them obviously. Sorry annee but there is no scale for me. Just like i bet you there is no scale for the majority either.
I dont know any person who thinks they are bisexual without BEING bisexual.
I dont understand how any of you can say "we are all born bisexual" when proof points to the opposite! How many men do you see looking at two men and finding that attractive? NONE THAT I KNOW.
Sorry to disappoint you. I am pro LGBT because I worked several years for a company who's employees were predominately LGBT. I was the minority being straight. They were free to be themselves - unlike the "token" gay working among straights.
I learned a lot. Mostly that "People are People". Gays are NOT a group think. They are not even a group think on gays. They were very diverse in their opinions. They were actually very critical of each other.
Some gays are horrified by the overt sexual displays of other gays. Some gays really hate this stereotype on public display such as the gay parades. But I don't really see any major difference between a once a year "gay display" and Mardi Gras - - - except in people's minds.
I believe having been forced to the fringe of society - - they had to create their own sub-culture. But the more they are allowed to "just be" living normal among regular society - - the outlandishness will subside quite a bit. At least in public displays.
More and more LGBT are (in my opinion) wanting to settle down into regular family living. Because now they can. Marriage will help them become more main stream.
---------------------------------------
As far as me being bi-sexual. How do you define sexual? Is sexual just a physical act? Or is it a bonding? A comfortable nurturing feeling?
Honestly - I've never had a bi-sexual experience. I grew up in an all boy neighborhood. Didn't have a girlfriend until I was in junior high. By that time - at least in the late 50s - boy crazy was the only acceptable behavior.
I do think with today's - - more open acceptance - - I would have liked to at least have had a same sex bonding experience.
So I'd say my scale reading is more to the hetero side - - but close enough to the middle I'd consider the experience of bi-sexual.
[edit on 9-8-2010 by Annee]
Originally posted by Unst0ppable0ne
Maybereal11,
Your lack of knowledge is vast.
Originally posted by maybereal11
You do realize that the vast majority of homosexuals were born to your typical mother and father that demonstrated a loving relationship...at the very least as much as parents of heterosexual children?
Majority? Where is your evidence for that?
I recall there being evidence that the majority of homosexuals are raised in broken homes. A few google searches will reveal lots of sources for this.
A boy raised by a single mother is more likely be to raised more femamine, and is attracted to more femanine things (like the same sex).
A girl raised by a single father is more likely to be raise more masculine, likeing masculine things (like the same sex).
However, there are times where quiet children who do not express their thoughts build them up and they go untreated. If little tommy boy would have not been shy and told his father that he likes his friend jimmy, well his father would have taught him that it is not natural. If that situation doesn't happen, the child goes untreated so to speak.
I never claimed that being subject to a certain environment is the only reason for homosexuality. I am just saying that it has a HUGE effect. There are other reasons homos are homos, and it's ALL MENTAL.
Originally posted by maybereal11
The idea that homosexuals are the result of some failure of education or demonstratitve love by the parents...well I can't get around it...that is the stupidest thing that has been said on this thread so far...and that is saying a lot!.
Once again, your lack of knowledge is vast. You know nothing about the subconsicous mind and the many factors that control it and effect it.
To just deny it without even looking at the facts is pure ignorance, and is probably the most stupid thing anyone can do in their life.... and that is saying a lot!
To outright dismiss the environments effect on a humans preferences is just plain idiotic.
Originally posted by maybereal11
You can't "Teach" straight or gay.
Your problem is that you focus on the word "teach". I am not saying you put someone in a class room, and teach them... I'm saying you subject them to cetain environments at a young age and they "pick up" certain ideas and thoughts.
Your lack of understanding this shows your lack of insight and knowledge of the human mind.
Originally posted by maybereal11
If you are incapable of that, then please don't have kids lest you raise one more broken psuedo-sociopath for the world.
If you are homosexual, please don't have kids. Do us all a favor, and keep that disgusting mental retardation out of this world.
[edit on 9-8-2010 by Unst0ppable0ne]
Originally posted by Annee
reply to post by Nofoolishness
I chose to present it the way I did. Nice response BTW.
Oh Yeah! You're a guy. You mean "Do It".
Gave you the girl version for fun. Sexual bonding is going to lead to "Do It".
Weird I got divorced right in the middle of the sexual revolution and never got it on with a female.
Sure - why not.
Originally posted by Greensage
I do not agree with "gay marriage", I never have agreed with that. This is clearly a bunch of fags wanting to justify to someone that they can step on the "Institution of Marriage", be it the parent, the church, or society. Marriage is a religious doctrine, at least the kind of marriage these people want; what ever happened to the simple idea of civil union? This has always made me suspect for anyone wanting some kind of white wedding. I think they just have a lot of pain inside of them and they are lashing out.
reply to post by FraternitasSaturni
Taking into account your blatant sarcasm and deliberate intention on causing a "morals war" implying that people that are conservative should be compared with the extremes of lack of freedom, having no respect what so ever for people's right to an opinion and freedom of speech, I answer you this:
I wouldnt choose a country to live in. I would stay and drive you out. Now you can think about a country whos all gay friendly and ask yourself the same question: What country that is currently "oh-so-gay" would you choose to live in?
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by halfoldman
reply to post by halfoldman
Could I ask that only people interested in the topic reply?
The mods will decide in any case whether the topic stays, goes, or is moved.
Professional topic/thread-killers - please don't tell me it's been done, or use those sub-troll posts to intimidate me.
All on-topic posts are welcome.[edit on 8-8-2010 by halfoldman]
First you declare in your OP that anyone that has issues with the gay agenda is a "homophobe". False. Recall that the word homophobe means fear of gays. Anyone can dislike something without being afraid of it. Example: I may dislike the look, smell and taste of liver, but I am NOT a "liver-o-phobe" - afraid of it, OR anyone else that does.
Then in the post above you make a second attempt to demonize anyone that would disagree with your point of view. I guess by "on topic" you mean only those that agree with you are allowed to post here?
This is generally not how it's done here on ATS.
IMO the homophobe card is being played way too often as a demonization tool against those that simply do not agree - just like the race card. Where is YOUR tolerance?
Remember deny ignorance? To that I often add deny hypocrisy.
[edit on 8/9/2010 by centurion1211]
Originally posted by dragnet53
BTW I am not fear of homophobes. I am just sick of the nonsense.
Originally posted by dragnet53
reply to post by Annee
causing a rift between both sexes and making it hard for guys like me to find the right significant other. my god homosexuality is spreading like wild fire.