It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
It was purportedly taken ”in 1942, over the Pacific”
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/06ec261206c1.jpg[/atsimg]
www.ufocasebook.com...
I have pondered this picture for many years.
My question is, do you think the photo is “real”?
Originally posted by Unknown Soldier
My dad was a fighter pilot in WW2 and seen them himself over the pacific. He said they were like fire balls and they just followed them.
The Japanese and Germans did not know what they were either. Funny how nobody fired on them im sure they realized it would be foolish not knowing what these things were capable of. As for the foo fighters being the Nazi's secret weapon i really cant see it simply because the foo fighters did not down any planes or disrupt the campaigns.
What are they? I have no clue.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Originally posted by Heliocentric
The Foo Fighter phenomenon was born mainly from eye witness observations by experienced war-time pilots and gunners who saw them with their own eyes outside the aircraft, and they (often) behaved in a guided manner (stalking the planes), which is why it was thought to be a new German weapon, not optical illusions.
That is exactly my point. For some reason people seem to think that optical illusions don't stalk or follow a plane, but in fact they can and do. So I think therein lies part of the reason people thought these things couldn't possibly be illusions or reflections because they didn't understand that those things can follow the plane.
Originally posted by FireMoon
I have tried to find the documentary made for British Tv where the Concord sighting is fully explained by someone who use to use the very same camera as the one in the Concord film. It is a lens effect, a known one, of a certain series of cameras.
Originally posted by FireMoon
reply to post by Heliocentric
I can only find part of the same documentary on line about a sighting by a BBC camera crew and reporter in Oxfordshire. The name of the actual whole documentary isn't listed.
Originally posted by Thill
reply to post by Conan The Usurper
You are assuming alien creatures , if those really are ET have the same thinking patterns as humans .
Also this does not have to be an advanced alien spacecraft , it can also be a rudimentary life form that lives in the atmosphere and is just attracted to something that planes emit , like heat , radio waves , etc Just like a moth is attracted to light
[edit on 8-8-2010 by Thill]
Originally posted by Conan The Usurper
Originally posted by Thill
reply to post by Conan The Usurper
You are assuming alien creatures , if those really are ET have the same thinking patterns as humans .
Also this does not have to be an advanced alien spacecraft , it can also be a rudimentary life form that lives in the atmosphere and is just attracted to something that planes emit , like heat , radio waves , etc Just like a moth is attracted to light
[edit on 8-8-2010 by Thill]
1- no i'm not assuming they have the same thinking patterns, i am assuming they would adapt their thinking to ours since they are the visitors, it's the least they could do.
Originally posted by Thill
1- no i'm not assuming they have the same thinking patterns, i am assuming they would adapt their thinking to ours since they are the visitors, it's the least they could do.
So you are adapting to thinking patterns of apes when going to the zoo ? or Elephants when going to the savanna ? or fish when you are diving ? I do not think so , You (generally speaking) still follow elephants around in cars, you still follow fish around underwater , you still go stare at apes in the zoo. I would say we as the visitors do not adapt to other species thinking patterns , so why would they ?