to Sue or to Poo, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 64 times


reply posted on 7-8-2010 @ 01:54 PM by OrionTri
reply to post by plube



I've given you a flag for the "lolz" because i think this is as funny as it is ridiculous.
I can imagine the case going through and winning because "we don't want to insult anybodies faith or culture". We're too PC, and it's awful.

It's similar to suing somewhere because you've moved over from some obscure country i've never heard of and only speak "obscure-country-ian", not learning the new countries main language and then suing somewhere because you slipped or tripped and the "watch out, wet" sign isn't in your language.

People not learning to adapt to other cultures is as offensive as anything.


reply posted on 7-8-2010 @ 01:57 PM by jeanvaljean
reply to post by plube



I hope you'll forgive me, plube. This is a serious matter but I couldn't stop giggling while reading your OP (I felt a bit queasy as well).
Anyway, I think that there is a point where accommodating does become bending over, and that the suit should be dismissed as a 'you've-got-to-be- kidding-me, just-sit-down, lean-on-your-elbows-and-push-or-if-you-insist-on-perching-on-top, wear-a-helmet' frivolous waste of time.
To sue or to poo?
My vote is to poo!
All the best.

Edited for spelling.

[edit on 7-8-2010 by jeanvaljean]



reply posted on 7-8-2010 @ 02:07 PM by plube
reply to post by muzzleflash



Yes the word loo is a very common usage...and it does fit in this case.

When he goes to court i bet he will even use the word loo...and i hope the judge does as the previous post does.....

right out of court.


reply posted on 7-8-2010 @ 02:40 PM by plube
reply to post by jokei



I truely understand it may be a religious thing...and they can keep it in a religious context...but it is definately upto England to provide for their religious needs in goverment and publicly owned buildings.

It is not just happening in England it happens in canada too.

IT is not the public that should have to pay for ones own religious beliefs...if they dont want to learn to sit in a publicly owned toilet...then just hold it in.

just as i would have to learn to squat in a publicly owned toilet in their country or pee down a hole in some European countries...or use an outhouse and s*it in a pit in someplaces in Canada.

others learn to cope....so should they.

It is not upto the public or the goverment to accomodate religious beliefs.

I kinda like going to the loo after someone...least the seat is still warm.

maybe if we just heat the seat....

a whole new way to be on the hot seat.






reply posted on 7-8-2010 @ 02:42 PM by plube
reply to post by Bhadhidar



oh man...triggers triggers triggers....that reminds of the Movie Demolition man.



You mean he doesn't know how to use the shells


reply posted on 7-8-2010 @ 03:12 PM by plube
reply to post by wigit



I was told by the caretaker of the building it is aparently common practice and the are lifting the seat and putting their feet on the thin edge of the wedge.

also another issue is....but not part of the case is they are damaging the floors in the loo's as they are then washing their feet in the sink.

i mean if you are placing your feet there i guess they could need washing after.

now that was a sidenote i found strange cause it is ok to have your feet touch a much dirtier area of a toilet....but not ok too have your bottom cheeks come in contact.

but, I still think the issue is common sense and fitting in with the natives.

I refuse to become a Squatter.

I am a siter all the way.



[edit on 033131p://f13Saturday by plube]


reply posted on 7-8-2010 @ 04:57 PM by jaynkeel
reply to post by lel1111



I would highly suggest not wearing flip flops or croc's in those bathrooms!!!! LOL


reply posted on 7-8-2010 @ 05:00 PM by Ex
reply to post by plube



One Guestion if I may...

Where's the toilet tissue??
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^