Originally posted by Seventytwo
reply to post by mjd59
I've learned so much from you, thank you..
It's an amazing language, talking to us on many levels, I don't think there is any doubt that Hebrew teaches science and not the other way
The Israelites originated from Mesopotamia, Historical origins of the language but go back beyond 2000/3000 BC.
The Rig Veda, the oldest among the Sanskrit Vedas, is said to be 10,000 years old But Sanskrit can be said to be much older.
You said yourself that you do not know much about Sanskrit but it would be interesting to know if you can see any similarities with Hebrew?
Ya... I know what people say about the rig veda.... To be honest, i think that is all trumped up. I dont know why they say that, and why others like
to validate that, when there is absolutely no archeological evidence whatsoever to justify that assertion.
The oldest relics of civilization goes back to Sumer circa 3800 BCE. We have absolutely nothing before that. Why is it ok to just say, without any
evidence, that the rig veda goes back 10,000 years!? Thats an enormous number. I know the Hindus have a seriously complex calendar that postulates
ages and cycles that are enormous in size. People seem impressed by this. I dont know why. This could be nothing more than speculation.
So, to me, what should be the criteria to figure out which language is more significant? I think from what ive shown, Hebrew is that language. It
doesnt matter how old it appears. What matters is something that doesnt exist in other languages. The philosophical/numerological correspondences are
simply beyond coincidence. I have had the fortune of studying Greek and Aramaic aswell. Greek grammatically is very esoteric, as is Aramaic, Arabic
and most languages in general. Theyre all archetypally constructed. This is because the 'archetypal' consciousness of the speaker, collectively
referred to as 'an angel', is an intelligence which actually organizes the language. And i assume the "creators" of the language recieve this
information via divination. This is also why through performing certain symbolic processes in their gematria (Iosophia), ex.
The numerical value of O HELIOS (Ho Eelios, Helios, The Sun) = 393, which reduces to 11+3-9+3 = 8, as does APOLLWN O CRUSOUS QEOS (Apollon Ho Khrusous
Theos, The Golden God Apollo) = 3385, for 11+5-8+3-3 = 8. The numerical value of Apollo's motto, "Nothing too much," is MHDEN AGAN (Meden agan) =
162, which also reduces to 11+2-6+1 = 8.
The number 11 is always utilized in Greek gematria. This is funny, because 11 symbolizes duality and otherness. Whereas 10 (as in 10 sefirot)
symbolizes 2 entities, one nullified to the other, 10, is a number of humility, whereas 11 is a number of egocentricity. In signifies units, both of
which acknowledge their existence. In kabbalistic language it acknowledges Da'at, as a sefirah aswell, which is ones sense of self. This is an
arrogant attitude, because in truth, man is merely an emanation of his source. We dont regard a ray of light as something other than the suns light,
likewise, were, each of us, an expression of the creator. Thus, we see that in chapter 11 in kings, Solomon turns away from the creator. In this
chapter Solomon is said to have recieved a yearly tribute of 666 talents of gold from the nations aroudn him. 666 is the gematria of tassur - to
deviate. "the gold from the nations around him" refers to the wisdom of the nations (gold). He was led astray by their beliefs.
True, i dont know much about sanskrit. Though, its fair to assume that it doesnt have the numerilogical consistency and exactitute that Hebrew does.
No language, not Arabic, Aramaic, or Greek has shown that. And given theres nothing on the internet about Sanskrit numerology, and thousands of
sources for hebrew, i think that implises something.