It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by unityemissions
Oh yea, that was because the retarded sign said Had a double B. Where I come from a double B means billion barrels. But I corrected myself once I saw the glaringly obvious wrongs in it.
One wrong, however, does not make this wrong. The fact is that it costs 100 million barrels to fuel the army. a year
That's a lot of oil. We could save a lot of time using our own oil and waiting for our new technology.
And then of course is the obvious question. The oil companies would quadruple their profits if they moved onto more than just oil products. So why don't they? The returns of producing other fuels would be massive.
Originally posted by XPLodER
reply to post by Gorman91
many people have designed alternate energy sources and are too scared to release them as in the past when these things are released the inventor takes a dirt nap