It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
1. The Holocaust of 1900, described in New York Times June 11, 1900?
2. The Holocaust of 1919, described in The American Hebrew, October 31, 1919?
3. The Holocaust of World War II, proclaimed by the Soviets at the Nuremberg show trials?
There have been countless "Holocausts" since the ancient Talmudic prophesy that the Kingdom of David would return after 6,000,000 Jews died in fiery furnaces.
Originally posted by oozyism
reply to post by NichirasuKenshin
No, that isn't the evidence of how many Jews died during WWII, that number can be estimated through statestics.
This is evidence of Zionist agenda, we all know what they wanted, and we all knew what they were willing to do to achieve that objective.
They have done it.
Originally posted by KilrathiLG
reply to post by gem_man
yeah mroe russians died then jews but im pretty sure but could be wrong that more chinese were killed then any one else just saying
over 60 million people died in WWII, 60/100* 6 = 3.6%.
Originally posted by oozyism
Why does that make the Holocaust the most important?
Originally posted by oozyism
reply to post by NichirasuKenshin
Is it a coincidence that the number is 6 million, as usual, which has occurred over and over again throughout history, to Jews?
Foul me once, shame on you, Bush says, "a foul can't get fouled again".
So think here for a second: I'm saying that this hints to us the Zionist agenda.
We all know what Zionists wanted, don't you get it?
The Zionist organization was supported by the US, and other Western nations. Its head quarters were in US I think.
Zionists wanted a home land in Palestine under any means necessary.
They even used terrorism against Britain in regards to Palestine.
Key word AGENDA.
If you want to know how many Jews actually died during WWII, check the statestics.
Originally posted by oozyism
reply to post by NichirasuKenshin
You based your whole post on general belief of history, while we are debating that same history.
That can't be right can it?
Jews weren't the only group being prosecuted, but you claim their prosecution was the most intense, and they had the highest level of being killed, or left to die.
That is what we are debating, you believe they are facts, I believethey are distorted facts joined together to create a lie.
Although Jews were hated, just like Muslims are hated today. I can bring distorted facts, join it together and create the same image portrayed in regards to Jews under Zionists.
Originally posted by oozyism
reply to post by NichirasuKenshin
This is not going anywhere, let's forcefully take it somewhere:
- Start - How many Jews died during WWII - _with evidence_
You start!
"You see... " we all know that " is a vague argument from authority. I'd be interested in what you mean by "we".. All other Holocaust-Denyers?
Originally posted by Zamini
I´m tired of scholars destroying knowledge.
Shame be on you sir.
Academic? Please, that words means nothing in this world anymore. Money won't teach you a single thing about discovering and researching truth.
You turn the "we" into holocaust-deniers. A word you would have not known without the zionist agenda, you seem to know this and go around it or you simply are that ignorant.
But then again, you have no idea what you're talking about do you?
What is becoming increasingly interesting to me is that people know the Israeli government is corrupt and genocidal(don't try to argue this and say you're a scholar, yuck, you people denied Rwanda, you people deny Sudan).
From false flags to drag the US into wars to arms dealing to pretty much every rebel organization that is being fought by the US.
Yet, certain individuals who get paid to refuse to accept the truth have to pretend to be this and that...how can you not realize your time is done mr. suit and tie?
It's as if academics and scholars such as yourself are just stuck in backward history. Why backwards? Because you still believe the nonsense propaganda agencies were spreading over 80 years ago.
We are in an age where information is spread like wildfire.
We have the chance to overthrow propaganda.
When you fight tooth and nail to keep the information from being spread and to keep the propaganda in place, you are living backwards and to call yourself an academic would be hypocritical, though academics usually are the greatest hypocrites.
So why, WHY, for heaven sake, are you saying what you are saying?
Why are you ignoring points made and why are you calling others holocaust deniers?
They didn't ask to get put in a tiny box because they QUESTIONED something.
Why are you calling Iran anti-semetic when Iran has more semites living there in peace than Israel has living in peace?
Sir, you stink in a fishy way. Academic? Don't make me laugh. Oh wait...too late...
Please provide examples of any and all scholars who have "denied Ruanda" or "deny Sudan"... That's quite a loony statement. Please show me one scholarly work that argues that no people were killed in Sudan or Ruanda. Good luck with that.
Why don't you make a thread were you elaborate on and back up your ridiculous claims? Or is blanket accusation all you've got?
You mean you're using the chance to spread your own? That would be a more honest formulation.
Feel free to point out any and all places and instances where I "fought" to keep information from being spread?
I said Iran is the birthplace of much of the anti-Isreal propaganda today, and it has been that way since even the days of the Sha.
Uhm-.- I specialized in modern European history. So you are telling me that the sources I use are from the 1930's? (2010-80=1930)