posted on Aug, 6 2010 @ 09:28 PM
When on ATS you publish too much of others people work, you become guilty of plagiarism-Copyright Infringement. But if your Wikileaks and publishes
19,000 Pentagon documents, http://__._/wiki/Afghan_War_Diary,_2004-2010 without even removing names-other damaging details, then you’re
guilty of nothing?
Copyright law seems pretty strict about copying without permission www.copyrightservice.co.uk...
Thursday did the Pentagon formerly ask Wikileaks to delete the documents,
Naturally Wikileaks has yet to do the right thing!!
My Thoughts About Wikileaks…
When I first heard Wikileaks had released the “Afghan War Diary” reports presumed it would be another Pentagon Papers
where the publics hero(s) actually took the time to read-understand the top secrets documents they
. The New York Times actually used a dedicated team to process Daniel Ellsberg’s information.
As it is, many Afghans who (for one reason or another) who helped provide the U.S with valuable information against the Taliban presence, are now
either dead, or due to be –or a refugee.
This makes the Leakers as bad as anyone guilty of the most complacent manslaughter.
I say: The Pentagon needs to make a valid effort to find anyone injured or harmed as a direct result of Wikileaks lack of name editing. That once
found, the victim(s) should be granted legal aid, so that they may sue Wikileaks for every possession it has.
I just hope the Lefties dominating (the whole DemoRep establishment) aren’t publicity shy of fighting manslaughter? Cos if that’s the reason for a
lack of action, then shame on them!