It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rival
There is a high probability that each step we take will end up like everyone before it, but there is no logical base for it.
So we use faith everyday to stave off madness, I don't see why applying it to god makes any less sense.
For me it makes less sense because I have never interacted with God
in a tactile way. But I interact with the ground under my feet everyday
in a tactile way. The ground is part of a tangible and tactile reality that
I assess in real time, making logical assumptions based on previous
experience to keep myself safe from harm.
Sorry, It is not my intention to direct your philosophy thread to religion. Please carry on with the philosophy...it is more fun.
Originally posted by Jeanius
THE USA IS NOT A DEMOCRACY!!!
It's a republic, which means majority rules... UNLESS it infringes on someone's rights!!
Ben Franklin said something along the lines of "We just gave the nation a republic, how long they keep it that way is up to them".
A Democracy is SOCIALISM/COMMUNISM, if 51% of the voters want something from 49% of the voters, they get it.
NOT in a Republic though.
This judge saw that this law infringed on someones rights.
Seriously, you might want to sit down...
Originally posted by afterschoolfun
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Um, this is not philosophy in the least.
Your entire OP is based on faulty logic. You presume much. For example, the following:
-If god is perfect and good and all powerful he must be able and powerful enough to create a world with no evil
-Evil exists
-therefore god does not
Evil exists? how do you know that evil exists? Perhaps what you call "evil", i call "shiz happening"?
Evil is a term based on religion. To use it in your logic creates a flaw, as it is a circular logic type of thing. Without religion/God, there is no evil. Evil is dependant on the belief system.
I was going to say something but there's no point. You have no idea what philosophy is and I suggest you keep it that way. You wouldn't understand it.
Originally posted by Tamale_214
Science does this as well. Whole sub-fields of physics rely upon assumptions to further ideas. The Big Bang is a pretty fine example of this: "We don't know how the universe was formed, but here's a good guess...". Evolution is another..."we don't know how human beings came to be on the scene, but here's a good guess...let's believe that"
Originally posted by afterschoolfun
Originally posted by rival
1. Pascals Wager......only works when you have one God to choose from.
well apply it to each religion separately. a God(s) either exist(s) or not, thats the main basis. Honestly using that argument is... well grasping at straws.
No, that argument is literal. Pascal's Wager requires ONE dogma. And then
from that premise the wager is made. Otherwise, it is likely making a wager
on roulette, and expecting an outcome on the blackjack table.
2.The Problem of Evil......first you have to define evil. Will live in a reality
where YOU HAVE TO KILL LIFE and consume it to survive.
define life. aren't beings just clumps of electrons which are mostly empty space?
Now you are waffling between philosophy 101, and a more abstract
philosophy where nothing is assumed, effectively changing the format.
My point is, the definition of evil is arbitrary. The definition of life is
much less so. For the sake of discussion, if it moves, consumes, and
procreates, it is life.
Could there be
anything more evil, or more necessary? And it's a tad arbitrary on our
(human's) part how we decide what is evil about killing. It is based largely
on relative size. We think nothing of eradicating an ant hill or swatting a fly.
Mice, spiders, snakes, minnows...all small, all fair game, even if you want to
be cruel for cruel's sake.
WTF? Death is apart of life... and last time I checked, animals ate other animals as well... yep. it's still like that.
Here I am trying to arrive at a definition of what is truly evil. My
philosophy dictates that waste is the true evil.--killing without benefit.
Society disagrees with me, and sees cruelty, and the absence of conscience,
as the truest form of evil.
But as you move up in size, and/or cuteness
society's morality takes effect. Can't kill it unless you're going to eat it.
And you can't eat puppies and kittens...that's evil, lol.
society and morality are completely different issues. But there is no natural laws that prevent us (human ANIMALS) from acting naturally. And if it was between starving and eating a kitten, if your instinct doesn't kick in... well natural selection did us a favor
My turn......WTF?
More about what is evil....We made the whole thing up. We draw up our
own arbitrary and dynamic guide, separated by time and geography. What
is evil for one culture is acceptable and normal in another...we make it up
on the fly to suit our selfish needs.
True. some things are wrong because of arbitrary reasons (jaywalking etc.) but some things are wrong in and of themselves (raping a baby etc.) As far as time and culture goes, it's a slippery slope, say that morality is relative. Someone rapes a baby and it turns out they come from a baby raping culture you couldn't judge them... scary huh?
2. Free will.....There is simply no way to tell if we possess this.
But no matter. We live our lives, in EVERY society, as if freewill
is a given...even the fundamental theists who believe God is omniscient
operate under the assumption of freewill, regardless of logic.
umm Calvinists. Google it. And regardless of logic? Really? If god knows everything then he knows what you're going to do. Even the Bible mentions "predestination".
I don't understand your point. Predestination, or an omniscient
God, precludes freewill. If the outcome of your life is known, then your
actions are predetermined--you have no freewill. It is an either/or
proposition. But most theists defy logic and assume the two
exist simultaneously. It is the old "have your cake and it eat too" cliche'.
And yes, be skeptical about knowledge. Knowledge is dynamic. Today's
accepted truth is tomorrows false and silly notion. Always be skeptical
...it will keep you from falling off the edge of the world, and into the mouth
of a dragon.
I don't think you know what skepticism means in the philosophical community. It's not being unsure like in the way we use it in everyday language. It's denying it outright as in we know nothing we can't know anything.
You are probably right, I'm handicapped because I literally
did not finish ninth grade, but while assuming nothing is a fine premise for
discussion, it is not a workable premise for dealing with reality, as you
have already pointed out.
Believing the earth is flat wasn't knowledge because it wasn't true. A belief is NOT KNOWLEDGE, only a true FACT can be knowledge. OF course belief changes, but no matter how much you believe 2+2=5, it's still 4.
Is that philosophical skepticism or everyday skepticism. You are
having your cake here...Knowledge is what we believe we know, ie,. we
believe in facts, but as your professor of philosophy taught you
we know nothing.
Originally posted by Neo_Serf
reply to post by TheIrvy
...it follows that within inifinity perfection does exist
and the only perfection that can exist is infinity itself because only infinity can be without lacking.
So existing as finite beings that lack perfection, but still within the infinite perfection, our state of lackingness shows us that we have chosen to lack, since we are part of infinity and can never be divided from it. Therefor we exist in a dualistic/imperfect world due to choice and not coersion, since no force could make infinity do something against its will.
We chose to be imperfect, to experience good and evil, therefor the question should not be 'why has God done this to us?' but rather 'why have I chosen to experience this?'
Since lack of experience is the opposite of infinity, it follows that we chose to become ignorant, and the only point of this that my monkey mind can see is to *rediscover* infinity. To *rediscover* ourselves. For no other reason than to experience the wonder of looking up at the stars and wondering 'whats out there?'
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by TheIrvy
[more
I didn`t mention christian beliefs, i see you are interpreting and assuming.
God is always here, i didn`t have to read about it. Like i said know god.