It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Turiddu
UFO Hunters, yes the show where Bill Birnes believes UFOs are flying out of underwater secret bases, the same show where he claimed a US Army Sergeant traveled through time "twenty or thirty years ago".
Of course the CIA would want to interview those pilots. Why wouldn't they? It was the height of the Cold War and two pilots had reported strange aircraft flying around. Do you honestly think US intelligence agents went there to "Silence the truth about the aliens" or do you think they went there to ascertain whether a new Soviet aircraft or weapons system had been observed? Which explanation do you think is more plausible?
Originally posted by TortoiseKweek
Originally posted by Turiddu
UFO Hunters, yes the show where Bill Birnes believes UFOs are flying out of underwater secret bases, the same show where he claimed a US Army Sergeant traveled through time "twenty or thirty years ago".
Of course the CIA would want to interview those pilots. Why wouldn't they? It was the height of the Cold War and two pilots had reported strange aircraft flying around. Do you honestly think US intelligence agents went there to "Silence the truth about the aliens" or do you think they went there to ascertain whether a new Soviet aircraft or weapons system had been observed? Which explanation do you think is more plausible?
Firstly, if your post is directed to me, then you hit the "reply" command button.
Now, let me ask you this: What Soviet aircraft or weapons were available at that time? Remember, the US had satellites at that time! So what am I missing, and what do you know? Please indulge me with your knowledge...
I am hardly looking in this section as it is.
Originally posted by Breifne
BTW: How much can someone 'learn' about things that are inherently 'unidentified'?
(devils advocate post)
Originally posted by Silver Star
Yes, agreed!
At the moment, anybody offering up evidence for the existence of UFO's is merely providing fodder for the debunkers to work on.
There seems to be nobody who is willing to strongly argue the case for the 'believers' and thus half of the interest evaporates immediately as they are shouted down.
This is a bit of a 'call to arms' to those who want to speculate upon the subject.
Originally posted by torsion
The skeptics and debunkers are more often than not right in what they say on the subject so you will learn more about UFOs by listening to them.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
PC is a place where you no longer need proof, your now trying to understand the point...but the problem is, they tend to believe just about anyone
Originally posted by Turiddu
If this forum is to advance itself into a more legitimate focus then it needs to cut away the obvious hoaxes and new-age weirdness (The Reptilians, the Chinese Lanterns, the Stargates, the Galatic Federation of Light or whatever it's called ) and focus on using the scientific method to objectively research the strong cases.
Originally posted by badgerprints
Wow,
If you believe then you're a gullible idiot.
If you present anything less than an alien body or a ship then you're irrelevant.
If you have unconvincing evidence then you're a hoaxer.
Because hoaxers exist believers must all be hoaxers.
If you don't let 'sceptics' bash your thread then your'e obviously delusional because you can't accept the truth.
If you want to be able to discuss ufo's without being bashed then you are just bashing the sceptics.
????
Damn,
The kid just wants to talk about UFO's without being run off the thread on a rail. Can't people just agree to disagree on the subject and allow like minds a little time to communicate?
Originally posted by greeneyedleo
My response is: Be the change you wish to see. Do not like what you are seeing in this forum: How about you present us with some new stellar out of this world threads. Be the change you want to see. (this thread and my comments sound like dejavu actually). I see people complaining about this forum - but are not doing anything about it.
Originally posted by Copernicus
Originally posted by greeneyedleo
What picture, document or video would not be labeled as a hoax in this forum?
Originally posted by TrueBrit
Copernicus, I have to disagree on one important point. You claim that debunkers and skeptics are disrupting the progress of the UFO community , toward the ultimate goal of thier work. I cannot see how this could be the case.
For a start, skepticism in of itself is healthy , and prevents the frankly pathetic "Aliens as Gods" freaks from ruining what should be a solely scientific endevour. Its skeptics and debunkers who keep the preasure on the entire community as a whole to back up its thoughts and hypotheses with evidence, physical, mathematical and forensic.
I am all in favour of that, because I tire of badly shot pics and vids which can be forged and messed with, being called evidence. Evidence they may be , but proof they are not.
Second, it is not the fault of skeptics and debunkers that hoaxers, money makers, and scam artistry is RIFE amongst the higher tier of UFO speakers and personalities. Idiots who claim to be party to galactic parlimentary meetings, lackwits who claim but never proove that they are aliens from a different planet, people who scam the innocent and ignorant out of hundreds of dollars/pounds for books, and seminars, and this that and the bloody other. These people are the reason for the need for skepticism and the odd solid disproval. They are the people muddying the waters, making an already tricky problem, all the more thorny. Aim your displeasure where it belongs. At liars, cheats, frauds and the mentaly disturbed.
Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
Originally posted by Copernicus
Originally posted by greeneyedleo
What picture, document or video would not be labeled as a hoax in this forum?
Copernicus.....
What about this one?
Revisiting The 1994 Nellis Air Force Base UFO Video