It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Hiroshima was chosen due to its large size, its being "an important army depot" and the potential that the bomb would cause greater destruction due to its being surrounded by hills which would have a "focusing effect".
Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson struck Kyoto from the list because of its cultural significance,
The psychological effects on Japan were of great importance to the committee members. They also agreed that the initial use of the weapon should be sufficiently spectacular for its importance to be internationally recognized.
Originally posted by indigothefish
i can understand how many would have a problem with countries attacking other countries civilians in mass numbers during war.. however, that's just how america fights ( dirty ) ...
Originally posted by indigothefish
another good point is that hiroshima did not have any POW camps, which made another reason for it to be a good target
Originally posted by indigothefish
intimidation to the japanese (their military AND civilian people were not safe ), show of power to the world
Originally posted by ChrisF231
read up about the Japanese occupation of China. They butchered entire cities and raped women by the millions. They held contests to see who could impale the most Chinese babies on their bayonets and behead the most men with the Samurai swords.
Originally posted by Nikolam
reply to post by stirling
So what do you think America should have done?
Invade the Japanese mainland as Centurion mentioned, killing millions more?
Invade China and take on the entire Japanese army, killing (probably) tens of millions more?
Continue the firebombing of Japan's largest cities?
Wait for Stalin to keep his promise and invade China, possibly igniting a war between the US and USSR, assuming he actually kept his word?
Or, use the bomb(s) and end the war immediately?
Originally posted by airspoon
The difference here is that the US government actually destroyed millions of lives in a horrible and deliberate attack on civilians, while Islam (as a whole) didn't.
If we apologized, it would be one thing but to attend without apology seems a little harsh to say the least.
Japan didn't commit an act of terror by deliberately targeting women, children and innocent civilians.
Originally posted by CHA0S
Even if a nuke was necessary...did they have to specifically target the most densely populated area? Seems rather...psychopathic to me...you guys didn't want to stop a war...you wanted to test a new technology out and cull the Japanese population at the same time...couldn't you have landed one near them first as a warning? You really don't think an explosion of such magnitude would make them think twice about continuing on? Instead, you did the absolute opposite, there was no warning, there was no mercy, there was no remorse...the US committed what is likely the largest terrorist attack that has ever occurred IMO...
Secondly, you do realize if the US had tried to attack Japan via conventional means many many many more civilians in Japan would have died.
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
All the sissy-la-la pussyfoots are the reason our military can't win a fight.
Listen up people.
War is hell. Period. You do whatever it takes to win a war. Period.
This apology crap and "oh the poor people crap" is utterly ridiculous.
You fight to win. We have not done that since WW2, because of the PC crowd who want everything to be fair, and have soldiers shoot flowers at each other, then hug each other at the end.
Pathetic.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com