It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sceptical me...researching into the freeman subject has led me to evidence that the courts of most western countries have been highjacked and corporatised...
Originally posted by sceptical me...corporate law only does apply to you if you consent to contract...
Originally posted by EvillerBob
Originally posted by sceptical me...researching into the freeman subject has led me to evidence that the courts of most western countries have been highjacked and corporatised...
Would you be happy to share some of your research? I would be interested in the sources and your thoughts on them?
Unfortunately I am not only my own computer at the moment so cannot supply links to my research. There is such a mountain of information out there and much is contradictary. However, many threads on here and on other sites such as GLP have a great deal of legal (and lawful, there is a major difference) information to dredge through. As for whether a freeman can assume control of charges and dismiss a case, I'm not sure on that one, but another tactic is to refuse to consent and not give them jurisdiction. This sort of obfuscation will likeley delay the case until the common law statutes of limitation expires, as I understand it. But then again, they have a way of getting around this by trying you in absentia. In this case the you in question is still your strawman and not you the man or woman. If this happens you, as a man or woman, not person (legal fiction) or human being (monster, see Black's law dictionary) should appeal the case.
Originally posted by sceptical me...corporate law only does apply to you if you consent to contract...
This is largely accurate, though it also depends on who you mean when you say "you".
Originally posted by sceptical me
As I stated, I am fairly new to all this Freeman stuff. I have long felt that we lived in a corporatocracy from the evidence I have seen around me, but had no "real" evidence so to speak, but researching into the freeman subject has led me to evidence that the courts of most western countries have been highjacked and corporatised and corporate law only does apply to you if you consent to contract them them, and it seems that the language of the corporate courts is not the same language that you and I speak. As a result, we unwittingly and unknowingly enter into contract and acceptance.
Originally posted by loner007
To clarify he still owes the council money. The Baliff has now been given the debt. The Baliff has limited powers in which when they knock at the door you dont have to answer it. After a certain time as long as they never got into your place of living they will send the bill back to the council who will then can send the unpaid bill to the courts and ask for a jail sentence to be imposed.
[edit on 5/8/2010 by loner007]