It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by -PLB-
I read a bit more about the Delayed Choice quantum eraser experiment, but the explanation of the interference pattern seems to not exciting after all. From what I understand so far, the observed interference patterns are caused by phase differences of the initial photon. The phase has influence on both where the photon will hit sensor D0, and whether it will hit sensor D1 or D2. The latter is because the way beam splitters work (see for example here and here). When you combine the data of sensors D1 and D2 you will no longer see an interference pattern.
Originally posted by -PLB-
I can't remember where I heard this, (I found it an interesting thought) we should not see light as something that travels, but it is something that is already there instantly.
But I guess if this were true you could easily create paradox by delaying one of the entangles photons long enough. You could simply look at the created pattern, and if it is an interference patter you could decide to not erase the which-way data, or vice verca. Could it be that delaying one of the photons (by mirrors? Or a fiber?) they become disentangled?
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or serious. If you're serious, are you going to enlighten us regarding the correct math?
Originally posted by playswithmachines
MIT is full of it, their math is wrong, don't do it.
Originally posted by pepsi78
The part with the tape is a lie I think, made up, with no recording= wave or recording=particle while the detectors are still left operating.
Just my thought.
Originally posted by pepsi78
reply to post by Korg Trinity
It's really light that is crashing the wave, light will it's self create a pattern.
This with they left it on but did not record anything is a joke to make people move on and accept that by recording it will make the electron fly straight when in fact shining light on the wave will make it behave like a particle.
But now for the paradox part:
*With which way data known and then erasing it again after the measurement you still get an interference pattern.
As if the photon "knows" that in the future you are going to erase the which way data. But, if you can observe the interference pattern, then you can decide not to erase the which way data. And there you have the paradox.
This paradox is solved however if any way of delaying the photon erases the which way data.
The userentity principle is as follows, it is impossible to design an apparatus to determine what slit the electron will pass ..that will not at the same time disturb the electron enough to colapse it's wave function.
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by pepsi78
So you are saying this paper is a hoax?
grad.physics.sunysb.edu...
If so, do you have any source for this?
And I like to stress this again, the experiment does not involve any electron whatsoever.
[edit on 8-8-2010 by -PLB-]