Federal Reserve Charter expires 12/21/2012!!!

page: 9
61
<< 6  7  8    10 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 6 2012 @ 12:35 AM
link   
reply to post by rival
 
Your looking for the banking Act of 1933
found here:
www.archive.org.../n21/mode/2up




posted on Mar, 6 2012 @ 12:55 AM
link   
Federal Reserve Act
Section 31. Reservation of Right to Amend
1. Reservation of Right to Amend
The right to amend, alter, or repeal this Act is hereby expressly reserved.


If you're looking for an answer to rather they have a 99 or 100 year charter ... according to the above, it doesn't appear it matters.



posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 07:57 PM
link   
reply to post by ISHAMAGI
 


How to make a nation and its people suffer horribly and die: Make them hated worldwide through wars, economy and scandal. Make them poor through fiat and inflation. Dumb them down via foods, chemicals and media... then split!

It surely seems like the plan.



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 02:16 AM
link   
Has anyone figured out if it really does expire or not yet?



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 02:43 AM
link   
I am not sure how did they got the doom date exactly..to add spicy tot he doom porn..There was never a 100 year (or 99 year as some other similar lies state) charter for the Fed.
It was set up in 1913 with each individual Federal Reserve Bank having a 20 year charter.
However congress passed the Pepper McFadden Bill in 1927 giving the banks perpetual charter. The system can only come to an end as a result of an act of congress.



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 02:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
the United States incorporated and went into Bankruptcy in 1933


Oh dear, you were spinning a nice little yarn until you dropped that obvious clanger. That is just silly.

{quote]Today the United States, Inc. is still in Bankruptcy receivership

no it is not.



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 01:16 PM
link   
reply to post by AncietSoul
 


Well then someone tell me why the federal reserve won't accept its own currency as payment.

Why will they only take gold certificates... It seems to me like if they take 1% of the gold every year, after 99 years, there will be no gold left.... 1913..... 99 years later.... 2012.... who cares if there is an expiration date or not.... It sounds to me like the federal reserve has 99% of the gold, and if they decided to close up shop, the american dollar becomes worthless and they have all the gold.

This doesn't make sense to me, can anyone explain it?



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 01:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by xxshadowfaxx
It seems to me like if they take 1% of the gold every year, after 99 years, there will be no gold left....


Actually if you did the maths they will never get all the gold.... but that claim is just not true!


this doesn't make sense to me, can anyone explain it?


The reason it makes no sense is it is just a silly claim, not based on any fact.



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 01:21 PM
link   
thats why it 99%... the other 1 % is spread too thin



posted on Nov, 28 2012 @ 04:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by hellobruce

Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
the United States incorporated and went into Bankruptcy in 1933


Oh dear, you were spinning a nice little yarn until you dropped that obvious clanger. That is just silly.

{quote]Today the United States, Inc. is still in Bankruptcy receivership

no it is not.



On no you didn't....

Just marking thread for later

Ty proto for all the info. Great.stuff.
edit on 28-11-2012 by Another_Nut because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 3 2013 @ 08:32 AM
link   
Just giving this a little bump as I haven't seen it discussed lately.
Anybody heard or seen anything in regards to this in the past couple of weeks?



posted on Jan, 3 2013 @ 08:36 AM
link   
reply to post by Afterthought
 


The thread was a hoax and n ow the supposed hoax time has passed and nothing happened because it was a hoax.

That's typical for hoaxes.



posted on Jan, 3 2013 @ 08:38 AM
link   
reply to post by stereologist
 


I must've missed the memo.
Where is it proven that this was a hoax?



posted on Jan, 3 2013 @ 09:00 AM
link   
reply to post by Afterthought
 


From the start this was an obvious hoax in which someone inserted an expiration time.



posted on Jan, 3 2013 @ 09:11 AM
link   
reply to post by stereologist
 


I asked for proof. You gave me your opinion of what someone else might have done.
Here's another thread about it:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Nothing in this thread backs up your claim that it's a hoax. One person states that the Fed could simply reinstate their charter.



posted on Jan, 3 2013 @ 09:39 AM
link   
reply to post by Afterthought
 



I asked for proof.

Then provide the proof that there is an expiration date to the federal reserve.

The burden is not on me to provide proof that this is a hoax. We all know this is an obvious hoax.


Nothing in this thread backs up your claim that it's a hoax. One person states that the Fed could simply reinstate their charter.

There is no expiration for the federal reserve. The hoax is the made up story that it can expire.

Let's see the PROOF that there is an expiration date.

Oh and while you're looking for some nitwit website that simply claims there is you might as well read this
www.federalreserve.gov...

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913--which established the Federal Reserve as the central bank of the United States--has been amended or altered by the Congress numerous times over the years, but the act has never included an "expiration date" or repeal date. As stated in the law itself, the Federal Reserve Act can only be repealed, amended, or altered by the Congress.


In other words, this is an obvious hoax and anyone looking at the law would have seen that there is no expiration date.



posted on Jan, 3 2013 @ 09:52 AM
link   
reply to post by stereologist
 


Thanks for finally offering that last tidbit to prove what you were stating.
That wasn't so hard was it?



posted on Jan, 3 2013 @ 10:08 AM
link   
reply to post by Afterthought
 


The onus is on the claimant to provide proof. This thread claims there is an expiration date. I don't have to prove there is none.

The problem is that no one checked and yet the thread went on and on and on as if there was some truth to the hoax posted in the OP.

Check people. It's simple to do.



posted on Jan, 3 2013 @ 10:10 AM
link   
Next year,,,,,2013.
But it is never too early to start worrying about it I suppose.



posted on Jan, 3 2013 @ 10:25 AM
link   
reply to post by stereologist
 


All your posts are filled with smugness.
If you go back to my original post on this page, you'd see that I was asking for an update on this. Just an update. You're the one who stated that it was a hoax. I simply asked you to prove that. So, you're the one who's supposed to provide proof. Please remember for future posts, if you're going to provide someone with an answer to their question, be prepared to back it up instead of throwing your toys around because they want you to provide facts as well.





new topics

top topics



 
61
<< 6  7  8    10 >>

log in

join