reply to post by -PLB-
You're the one that made the claim. You shouldn't have went that route if you're not ready to prove it.
That is what ATS is all about right? The proof. So yes, I am being very reasonable. You asked for evidence of my claims, I gave video backing it.
Now, I'm asking that you provide evidence for your claims.
If it can be easily replicated as you say, then you should have NO PROBLEM in making this a reality. Its only natural with such an outlandish claim
as yours that someone would want evidence.
I need to see black helicopters circling your home, and I also need to see you replicate everything that is shown in those videos. Its quite fair to
ask for this evidence when you made a CLEAR claim that these things were easily replicated.
I can't wait to see your results.
You have until tomorrow. And if its not there at the stated time, I will spare no expense of calling you out.
For all those who are reading this thread, I want to note that I presented 3 people with the option of disproving my claims by providing video
evidence that they could replicate what I provided in my videos. All three of them made excuses and opted to leave once they were asked to provide
video evidence of their claims that they could replicate it themselves. One of them flat out stated that they would not waste their time disproving
the videos, because THEY THINK ITS SILLY. The other two made some of the worst excuses that I have ever seen to date on ATS in order to avoid
providing the evidence that they said that they could replicate.
This is the problem with skeptics. They're all talk, but no action. They will ask you over and over to provide proof, but, when they are asked to
do the same, you hear nothing but excuses.
What is interesting to me, is this last guy. He claims that he simply thinks its preposterous, yet, he's on a thread in which he completely does not
agree with the content, and never had intentions to agree. What would be a good reason for that?
So, I have asked for evidence from these said people, only to be declined because they cannot provide it.
[edit on 4-8-2010 by PsychoX42]